News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) | July 15, 2022

New research outlines potential risk to patients who wear certain types of face masks while undergoing an MRI scan 

New research outlines potential risk to patients who wear certain types of face masks while undergoing an MRI scan

Getty Images 


July 15, 2022 — Certain types of face masks are unsafe for wearing in and around MRI machines, according to new research by scientists at Cardiff University. 

The team tested eight different types of commercially available filtering face piece (FFP3) respirators and found that five contained magnetic components that they regarded as ‘MRI unsafe’. 

Many masks contain metal nose strips or clips to help shape the mask over the nose or metal staples to hold the elastic straps in place. Some masks also have an antimicrobial coating containing typically silver or copper. 

When reacting with the huge magnets inside an MRI machine, the metals components can cause a number of complications, including the displacement of the mask, the risk of the metal components flying off, or potentially burning the patient. 

There has already been one incident reported in the USA where a patient reported a face mask burn whilst undergoing an MRI scan. 

Furthermore, metal components can also cause artefacts to appear on a scan which can, in some cases, make the scans unusable. 

In the absence of any official guidance around the wearing of masks in and around MRI machines, the team recommend a color coded system to distinguish between ‘MRI safe’ masks and the ones that a patient may be wearing to their appointment on the day. 

In their study, the team performed three MRI scans on a 3D printed model of a head and neck which was fitted with eight commercially available FFP3 masks. 

The safety of each mask was based on the presence of ferromagnetic material components, the presence of metallic material, a measurable deflection at the bore of the MRI machine, and a temperature measurement greater than 40°C during testing. 

The team found that five of the eight masks contained ferromagnetic components and were thus classified as “MRI unsafe”. 

Two masks were deemed “MRI safe” whilst one was deemed “MRI conditional” due to the potential risk of local heating under certain conditions within the MRI machine. 

“At present there is no safety documentation surrounding the wearing of face masks in and around an MRI machine so hospital staff are unaware of the potential hazards that masks could pose,” said lead author of the study Dr Bethany Keenan, from Cardiff University’s School of Engineering. 

“It is therefore extremely important to not assume that a mask is safe prior to an MRI examination, and to conduct a safety evaluation to determine which components are made of ferromagnetic metals and which are non-ferromagnetic metal. 

“We suggest that where possible, surgical masks should be ordered in a separate colour to distinguish between an ‘MRI safe’ and an ‘MRI unsafe’ surgical mask.” 

The study was published in the journal Clinical Radiology. 

Additional MRI Safety Content: 

Use of Face Masks in the MRI Environment 

FDA Reminds Patients to Wear COVID Face Masks with No Metal During MRI Exams 

Indian Man Killed in MRI Accident 

VIDEO: Identifying and Eliminating MRI Safety Hazards 

How To Manage Risk in the MR Suite 

Closing the Loopholes in MRI Safety 

FDA Issues Draft Guidance on Medical Device Safety in MRI Environment 

Study Assesses Risk of MRI Exams for Patients With Tattoos 

MRI Safety and Technology Updates 

The Debate Over Gadolinium MRI Contrast Toxicity 

VIDEO: New App Improves MRI Safety For Implantable Devices 

Safety Guidelines for MRI Scanning 

Nurse Injured in MRI Accident at Swedish Hospital 


Related Content

News | Lung Imaging

Oct. 23, 2026 — The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute recently ...

Time October 23, 2026
arrow
News | Ultrasound Imaging

Oct. 19, 2026 – GE HealthCare has introduced LOGIQ Focus, a new addition to its LOGIQ family of general imaging ...

Time October 19, 2026
arrow
News | Artificial Intelligence

Oct. 7, 2026 – CARPL.ai has announced a collaboration with HOPPR that will give healthcare providers access to HOPPR's ...

Time October 08, 2026
arrow
News | FDA

Oct.7, 2026 – MRI2CT Inc. has received FDA 510(k) clearance for NextMR, its AI powered imaging platform, for generating ...

Time October 07, 2026
arrow
News | Information Technology

October 6, 2026 – Clearsense has introduced a cloud-based medical image archive designed to reduce the cost of ...

Time October 07, 2026
arrow
News | PET-MRI

Sept. 29, 2026 —Yale New Haven Hospital has installed a state-of-the-art positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance ...

Time October 05, 2026
arrow
Feature | Digital Pathology | Kyle Hardner

As recently as a decade ago, pathology technology was expected to become more expensive, larger and more precise. Yet in ...

Time October 02, 2026
arrow
News | ASTRO

Sept. 29, 2026 — The American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) has named Siemens Healthineers the inaugural ...

Time September 29, 2026
arrow
News | Computed Tomography (CT)

Sept. 17, 2026 — Royal Philips and Southwest Mississippi Regional Medical Center (SMRMC), which serves as the hub of ...

Time September 24, 2026
arrow
News | Radiology Education

Sept. 16, 2026 — As urgent care centers and outpatient healthcare facilities expand their use of diagnostic imaging, the ...

Time September 17, 2026
arrow
Subscribe Now