News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) | July 15, 2022

New research outlines potential risk to patients who wear certain types of face masks while undergoing an MRI scan 

New research outlines potential risk to patients who wear certain types of face masks while undergoing an MRI scan

Getty Images 


July 15, 2022 — Certain types of face masks are unsafe for wearing in and around MRI machines, according to new research by scientists at Cardiff University

The team tested eight different types of commercially available filtering face piece (FFP3) respirators and found that five contained magnetic components that they regarded as ‘MRI unsafe’. 

Many masks contain metal nose strips or clips to help shape the mask over the nose or metal staples to hold the elastic straps in place. Some masks also have an antimicrobial coating containing typically silver or copper. 

When reacting with the huge magnets inside an MRI machine, the metals components can cause a number of complications, including the displacement of the mask, the risk of the metal components flying off, or potentially burning the patient. 

There has already been one incident reported in the USA where a patient reported a face mask burn whilst undergoing an MRI scan. 

Furthermore, metal components can also cause artefacts to appear on a scan which can, in some cases, make the scans unusable. 

In the absence of any official guidance around the wearing of masks in and around MRI machines, the team recommend a color coded system to distinguish between ‘MRI safe’ masks and the ones that a patient may be wearing to their appointment on the day. 

In their study, the team performed three MRI scans on a 3D printed model of a head and neck which was fitted with eight commercially available FFP3 masks. 

The safety of each mask was based on the presence of ferromagnetic material components, the presence of metallic material, a measurable deflection at the bore of the MRI machine, and a temperature measurement greater than 40°C during testing. 

The team found that five of the eight masks contained ferromagnetic components and were thus classified as “MRI unsafe”. 

Two masks were deemed “MRI safe” whilst one was deemed “MRI conditional” due to the potential risk of local heating under certain conditions within the MRI machine. 

“At present there is no safety documentation surrounding the wearing of face masks in and around an MRI machine so hospital staff are unaware of the potential hazards that masks could pose,” said lead author of the study Dr Bethany Keenan, from Cardiff University’s School of Engineering

“It is therefore extremely important to not assume that a mask is safe prior to an MRI examination, and to conduct a safety evaluation to determine which components are made of ferromagnetic metals and which are non-ferromagnetic metal. 

“We suggest that where possible, surgical masks should be ordered in a separate colour to distinguish between an ‘MRI safe’ and an ‘MRI unsafe’ surgical mask.” 

The study was published in the journal Clinical Radiology

Additional MRI Safety Content: 

Use of Face Masks in the MRI Environment 

FDA Reminds Patients to Wear COVID Face Masks with No Metal During MRI Exams 

Indian Man Killed in MRI Accident 

VIDEO: Identifying and Eliminating MRI Safety Hazards 

How To Manage Risk in the MR Suite 

Closing the Loopholes in MRI Safety 

FDA Issues Draft Guidance on Medical Device Safety in MRI Environment 

Study Assesses Risk of MRI Exams for Patients With Tattoos 

MRI Safety and Technology Updates 

The Debate Over Gadolinium MRI Contrast Toxicity 

VIDEO: New App Improves MRI Safety For Implantable Devices 

Safety Guidelines for MRI Scanning 

Nurse Injured in MRI Accident at Swedish Hospital 


Related Content

News | Radiology Business

Nov. 13, 2025 — Covera Health recently announced that Advanced Radiology Services (ARS) has joined its national Quality ...

Time November 17, 2025
arrow
News | Radiology Business

Nov. 12, 2025 — Siemens has announced plans to deconsolidate its remaining stake in Siemens Healthineers (currently ...

Time November 13, 2025
arrow
News | Orthopedic Imaging

Nov.10, 2025 — Medical imaging technology company Adaptix Ltd. has received 510(k) clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug ...

Time November 11, 2025
arrow
News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Nov. 10, 2025 — There has been substantial progress in the past few years in the field of MRI in general and remote MR ...

Time November 11, 2025
arrow
News | Contrast Media

Nov. 10, 2025 — Scientists at the University of Birmingham have developed a new class of MRI contrast agents – improving ...

Time November 10, 2025
arrow
Feature | Teleradiology | Kyle Hardner

Once viewed as a solution for after-hours coverage, teleradiology is rapidly expanding into a critical part of radiology ...

Time November 06, 2025
arrow
News | X-Ray

Oct. 30, 2025 – In collaboration with OBIO, University Health Network (UHN), Canada’s leading hospital and the No. 1 ...

Time November 03, 2025
arrow
News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) | Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Oct. 28, 2025 — Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is the most common — and most serious — complication of extreme ...

Time October 31, 2025
arrow
News | FDA

Oct. 30, 2025 — Sirona Medical has received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 510(k) clearance for its Sirona ...

Time October 30, 2025
arrow
Feature | Archive Cloud Storage | Shujah Dasgupta, Vice President, CitiusTech

Almost two-thirds of health systems are already using (or plan to use) the cloud for storing and viewing medical images ...

Time October 30, 2025
arrow
Subscribe Now