News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) | July 15, 2022

New research outlines potential risk to patients who wear certain types of face masks while undergoing an MRI scan 

New research outlines potential risk to patients who wear certain types of face masks while undergoing an MRI scan

Getty Images 


July 15, 2022 — Certain types of face masks are unsafe for wearing in and around MRI machines, according to new research by scientists at Cardiff University

The team tested eight different types of commercially available filtering face piece (FFP3) respirators and found that five contained magnetic components that they regarded as ‘MRI unsafe’. 

Many masks contain metal nose strips or clips to help shape the mask over the nose or metal staples to hold the elastic straps in place. Some masks also have an antimicrobial coating containing typically silver or copper. 

When reacting with the huge magnets inside an MRI machine, the metals components can cause a number of complications, including the displacement of the mask, the risk of the metal components flying off, or potentially burning the patient. 

There has already been one incident reported in the USA where a patient reported a face mask burn whilst undergoing an MRI scan. 

Furthermore, metal components can also cause artefacts to appear on a scan which can, in some cases, make the scans unusable. 

In the absence of any official guidance around the wearing of masks in and around MRI machines, the team recommend a color coded system to distinguish between ‘MRI safe’ masks and the ones that a patient may be wearing to their appointment on the day. 

In their study, the team performed three MRI scans on a 3D printed model of a head and neck which was fitted with eight commercially available FFP3 masks. 

The safety of each mask was based on the presence of ferromagnetic material components, the presence of metallic material, a measurable deflection at the bore of the MRI machine, and a temperature measurement greater than 40°C during testing. 

The team found that five of the eight masks contained ferromagnetic components and were thus classified as “MRI unsafe”. 

Two masks were deemed “MRI safe” whilst one was deemed “MRI conditional” due to the potential risk of local heating under certain conditions within the MRI machine. 

“At present there is no safety documentation surrounding the wearing of face masks in and around an MRI machine so hospital staff are unaware of the potential hazards that masks could pose,” said lead author of the study Dr Bethany Keenan, from Cardiff University’s School of Engineering

“It is therefore extremely important to not assume that a mask is safe prior to an MRI examination, and to conduct a safety evaluation to determine which components are made of ferromagnetic metals and which are non-ferromagnetic metal. 

“We suggest that where possible, surgical masks should be ordered in a separate colour to distinguish between an ‘MRI safe’ and an ‘MRI unsafe’ surgical mask.” 

The study was published in the journal Clinical Radiology

Additional MRI Safety Content: 

Use of Face Masks in the MRI Environment 

FDA Reminds Patients to Wear COVID Face Masks with No Metal During MRI Exams 

Indian Man Killed in MRI Accident 

VIDEO: Identifying and Eliminating MRI Safety Hazards 

How To Manage Risk in the MR Suite 

Closing the Loopholes in MRI Safety 

FDA Issues Draft Guidance on Medical Device Safety in MRI Environment 

Study Assesses Risk of MRI Exams for Patients With Tattoos 

MRI Safety and Technology Updates 

The Debate Over Gadolinium MRI Contrast Toxicity 

VIDEO: New App Improves MRI Safety For Implantable Devices 

Safety Guidelines for MRI Scanning 

Nurse Injured in MRI Accident at Swedish Hospital 


Related Content

News | PET Imaging

April 24, 2024 — A new study from Brigham and Women’s Hospital, a founding member of the Mass General Brigham healthcare ...

Time April 24, 2024
arrow
News | Radiology Business

April 23, 2024 — A diverse writing group—lead by authors at the University of Toronto—have developed an approach for ...

Time April 23, 2024
arrow
News | FDA

April 23, 2024 — Royal Philips , a global leader in health technology, today announced its Philips Zenition 30 mobile C ...

Time April 23, 2024
arrow
News | Ultrasound Imaging

April 22, 2024 — GE HealthCare announced the launch of the Voluson Signature 20 and 18 ultrasound systems, which ...

Time April 22, 2024
arrow
News | Lung Imaging

April 17, 2024 — A Medicare policy requiring primary care providers (PCPs) to share in the decision-making with patients ...

Time April 17, 2024
arrow
News | Radiology Business

April 17, 2024 — VISTA.AI announced the appointment of Daniel Hawkins as President and CEO. The company is pioneering AI ...

Time April 17, 2024
arrow
News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

April 17, 2024 — Hyperfine, Inc., a groundbreaking health technology company that has redefined brain imaging with the ...

Time April 17, 2024
arrow
News | ACR

April 15, 2023 — The American College of Radiology (ACR) released an update to its ACR Appropriateness Criteria (ACR AC) ...

Time April 13, 2024
arrow
News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

April 10, 2024 — Online MRI and CT education leader, ImagingU, announced the launch of a new course for students and ...

Time April 10, 2024
arrow
Feature | Radiation Oncology | By Melinda Taschetta-Millane

In a new 3-part video series on advancements in diagnostic radiology with Robert L. Bard, MD, PC, DABR, FASLMS ...

Time April 10, 2024
arrow
Subscribe Now