The trial, led by researchers from Lund University in Sweden, has been published in The Lancet Oncology 

Getty Images


August 2, 2023 — Mammography screening supported by artificial intelligence (AI) is a safe alternative to today’s conventional double reading by radiologists and can reduce heavy workloads for doctors. This has now been shown in an interim analysis of a prospective, randomized controlled trial, which addressed the clinical safety of using AI in mammography screening. The trial, led by researchers from Lund University in Sweden, has been published in The Lancet Oncology.  

Each year around one million women in Sweden are called to mammography screening. Each screening examination is reviewed by two breast radiologists to ensure a high sensitivity, so called double reading. There is however a workforce shortage of breast radiologists, in Sweden and elsewhere, which can put the screening service at risk. Lately, the potential of AI to support mammography screening has attracted much attention, but how this is to be optimally conducted and what the clinical consequences will be, remains unclear.  

To know with certainty what happens when radiologists work with the support of AI requires studies in which women are randomly allocated to AI-supported screening or to standard screening. The Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence (MASAI) trial is the first randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of AI-supported screening. 

“In our trial, we used AI to identify screening examinations with a high risk of breast cancer, which underwent double reading by radiologists. The remaining examinations were classified as low risk and were read only by one radiologist. In the screen reading, radiologists used AI as detection support, in which it highlighted suspicious findings on the images”,  says Kristina Lång, researcher and associate professor in diagnostic radiology at Lund University and consultant at Skåne University Hospital, who led the study.  

The 80,033 women included in the safety analysis were randomly allocated into two groups: 40,003 women in the intervention group that underwent AI-supported screening and 40,030 in the control group that underwent standard double reading without AI support. 

“We found that using AI resulted in the detection of 20 % (41) more cancers compared with standard screening, without affecting false positives. A false positive in screening occurs when a woman is recalled but cleared of suspicion of cancer after workup,” says Kristina Lång.  

At the same time, the screen-reading workload for radiologists was reduced by 44 %. The number of screen readings with AI-supported screening was 46,345 compared with 83,231 with standard screening.  

The time aspect is important. Kristina Lång explains that, on average, a radiologist reads 50 screening examinations per hour. The researchers estimated that it took approximately five months less of a radiologist’s time to read the roughly 40,000 screening examinations in the AI group. 

“The study was conducted on a single site in a Swedish setting. We need to see whether these promising results hold up under other conditions, for example with other radiologists or other AI algorithms. There may be other ways to use AI in mammography screening, but these should preferably also need to be investigated in a prospective setting,” states Kristina Lång. 

A total of 100,000 women have now been enrolled in the MASAI trial. The research team’s next step is to investigate which cancer types that were detected with and without AI support. The primary endpoint of the trial is interval-cancer rate. An interval cancer is a cancer diagnosed between screenings and generally have poorer prognosis than screen-detected cancers. The interval-cancer rate will be assessed after the 100,000 women in the trial have had at least a two-year follow up.  

“Screening is complex. The balance between benefit and harm must always be taken into account. Just because a screening method finds more cancers does not necessarily mean it’s a better method. What’s important is to find a method that can identify clinically significant cancers at an early stage. However, this has to be balanced with the harm of false positives and the overdiagnosis of indolent cancers. The results from our first analysis shows that AI-supported screening is safe since the cancer detection rate did not decline despite a substantial reduction in the screen-reading workload. The planned analysis of interval cancers will show whether AI-supported screening also leads to a more accurate and effective screening programme,” says Kristina Lång. 

For more information: https://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/ 

 

Related Breast Density Content:  

VIDEO: FDA Update on the US National Density Reporting Standard - A Discussion on the Final Rule  

One on One … with Wendie Berg, MD, PhD, FACR, FSBI  

Task Force Issues New Draft Recommendation Statement on Screening for Breast Cancer  

Creating Patient Equity: A Breast Density Legislative Update  

FDA Needs to Ensure that Information on Dense Breast Notifications are Clear and Understandable to all Members of the Public  

AI Provides Accurate Breast Density Classification  

VIDEO: The Impact of Breast Density Technology and Legislation  

VIDEO: Personalized Breast Screening and Breast Density  

VIDEO: Breast Cancer Awareness - Highlights of the NCoBC 2016 Conference  

Fake News: Having Dense Breast Tissue is No Big Deal  

The Manic World of Social Media and Breast Cancer: Gratitude and Grief  

  

Related Breast Imaging Content:  

Single vs. Multiple Architectural Distortion on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis  

Today's Mammography Advancements   

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Spot Compression Clarifies Ambiguous Findings   

AI DBT Impact on Mammography Post-breast Therapy   

ImageCare Centers Unveils PINK Better Mammo Service Featuring Profound AI   

Radiologist Fatigue, Experience Affect Breast Imaging Call Backs   

Fewer Breast Cancer Cases Between Screening Rounds with 3-D Mammography  

Study Finds Racial Disparities in Access to New Mammography Technology  

American College of Radiology (ACR) Launches Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Imaging Screening Trial (CMIST) in Collaboration With GE Healthcare and the Breast Cancer Research Foundation


Related Content

Feature | RSNA | Christine Book

November 29, 2023 — Following the theme of the Radiological Society of North America Scientific Assembly and Annual ...

Time November 29, 2023
arrow
News | Artificial Intelligence

November 28, 2023 — iCAD, Inc., a global medical technology leader in innovative cancer-detection solutions, and ...

Time November 28, 2023
arrow
News | RSNA

November 28, 2023 — iCAD, Inc., a global medical technology company developing cancer-detection solutions, will present ...

Time November 28, 2023
arrow
News | RSNA

November 28, 2023 — New research being presented this week at the annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North ...

Time November 28, 2023
arrow
Feature | RSNA | Christine Book

November 28, 2023 — By early Monday morning, on the second day of RSNA 2023, there were significant news announcements ...

Time November 28, 2023
arrow
News | Artificial Intelligence

November 27, 2023 — Mass General Brigham and Annalise.ai today announced a collaboration to bring together their ...

Time November 27, 2023
arrow
News | Breast Imaging

November 27, 2023 — Barco announces introduction of the DL Precise AI software in addition to the current Intuitive ...

Time November 27, 2023
arrow
Feature | RSNA

November 27, 2023 — The collective anticipation of the radiology community was palpable from early morning through ...

Time November 27, 2023
arrow
News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

November 27, 2023 — Stronger quadriceps muscles, relative to the hamstrings, may lower the risk of total knee ...

Time November 27, 2023
arrow
News | RSNA

November 22, 2023 — GE HealthCare is preparing to showcase its Artificial Intelligence (AI)-enabled solutions at the ...

Time November 22, 2023
arrow
Subscribe Now