News | Pediatric Imaging | June 21, 2017

Diagnostic Radiation Exposure Safe for Children, Experts State

New article says radiophobia is based on erroneous belief in the linear no-threshold hypothesis, and that diagnostic quality is of utmost importance

Diagnostic Radiation Exposure Safe for Children, Experts State

June 21, 2017 — In an article published in the June 2017 issue of The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, researchers assert that exposure to medical imaging radiation not only doesn’t increase an adult person’s risk of getting cancer, it doesn’t increase a child’s risk. According to the authors, the long-held belief that even low doses of radiation, such as those received in diagnostic imaging, increase cancer risk is based on an inaccurate, 70-year-old hypothesis and leads to unnecessary fear and misdiagnoses.

The hypothesis referred to is the linear no-threshold hypothesis (LNT) promoted by Nobel Laureate Hermann Muller in 1946. Muller stated that the dose-response relationship is linear with no threshold dose, i.e., all radiation is harmful, regardless of how low the dose and dose rate.

“The underlying intent of lowering future cancer risk, although desirable, goes astray, as the premise is based on the erroneous LNT and the resulting as-low-as-reasonably-achievable (ALARA) principle,” asserted Jeffry A. Siegel, Ph.D., president and CEO of Nuclear Physics Enterprises, Marlton, N.J. “The assumption ignores evidence-supported adaptive responses that either repair mutations through enhanced repair enzymes or remove the unrepaired cells by apoptosis [death of cells as part of normal growth] or, most importantly, the immune system.”

Children are generally considered to be more vulnerable and, therefore, more sensitive to the effects of radiation than adults. Siegel noted, “…much of the current thinking about the risks of ionizing radiation is based on certain interpretations of the Hiroshima/Nagasaki life-span study.”

He says the study is interpreted incorrectly and points out that Japanese children younger than six at the time of the bombings at the end of World War II and exposed to radiation up to 200 mSv showed no significant difference in adult-onset cancers when compared with a control group. Siegel added, “Supportively, the French Academy of Sciences reported that these data provide evidence for protective adaptive responses and no valid evidence for harm below 100 mGy.”

Nuclear medicine and computed tomography (CT) radiation doses are low, and Siegel cited studies that show “initial radiation-induced damage is generally repaired or eliminated in a matter of hours by the body’s adaptive responses.” In addition, older children have a stronger immune system than adults. Siegel said, “low-dose radiation has been shown to stimulate the immune system to reduce cancer rates.” 

Why not err on the side of caution by continually striving to lower radiation exposure? Siegel stated, “…the obsession over lowering radiation dose is a futile and laborious attempt to minimize what is, in fact, a nonexistent risk.” He emphasized the importance of diagnostic quality and said, “Accurate information about low-dose radiation is the only way to undo fear…Radiophobia is detrimental to patients and parents, induces stress and leads to suboptimal image quality or avoidance of imaging, thus increasing misdiagnoses and consequent harm while offering no compensating benefits.”

For more information: www.jnm.snmjournals.org

Related Content

Sponsored Content | Whitepapers | Radiation Dose Management | September 10, 2018
It’s crucial for medical professionals to understand the radiation risk/ benefit balance of diagnostic imaging system
The CT scanner might not come with protocols that are adequate for each hospital situation, so at Phoenix Children’s Hospital they designed their own protocols, said Dianna Bardo, M.D., director of body MR and co-director of the 3D Innovation Lab at Phoenix Children’s.

The CT scanner might not come with protocols that are adequate for each hospital situation, so at Phoenix Children’s Hospital they designed their own protocols, said Dianna Bardo, M.D., director of body MR and co-director of the 3D Innovation Lab at Phoenix Children’s.

Sponsored Content | Case Study | Radiation Dose Management | September 07, 2018
Radiation dose management is central to child patient safety. Medical imaging plays an increasing role in the accurate...

Image courtesy of Medic Vision

Feature | Radiation Dose Management | September 06, 2018 | By Mukul Mehra, M.D.
While working with a patient with Crohn’s disease in my gastroenterology practice, I nearly ordered a computed...
Australian Pediatric Healthcare Network Adopts ResolutionMD Viewer
News | Remote Viewing Systems | August 31, 2018
August 30, 2018 — New South Wales, Australia’s Newborn and...
Radiation Therapy Affects Event Recall for Children With Brain Tumors
News | Radiation Therapy | August 24, 2018
Children with certain types of brain tumors who undergo radiation treatment are less likely to recall the specifics of...
Guerbet Partners With Imalogix on Dose Optimization With Artificial Intelligence
News | Radiation Dose Management | August 14, 2018
August 14, 2018 — Guerbet LLC USA announced a commercial partnership with Imalogix, a provider of...
Imalogix Brings Fluoroscopy Capabilities to Radiation Dose Management Platform
Technology | Radiographic Fluoroscopy (RF) | August 06, 2018
Imalogix, a provider of artificial intelligence (AI) process and workflow solutions, announced the availability of the...
Children's Hospital Colorado to Manage Medical Images Via the Cloud With Nucleus.io Platform
News | Remote Viewing Systems | July 30, 2018
NucleusHealth and Children’s Hospital Colorado’s (Children’s Colorado) Center for Innovation have formed a strategic...
Sectra radiation dose monitoring software can help manage radiation dose from multiple medical imaging modalities.
News | Radiation Dose Management | July 25, 2018
July 25, 2018 – Sectra will install its cloud-based,...