Feature | Breast Imaging | May 28, 2020 | By January Lopez, M.D.

The Exciting Future of AI and Mammography - and Physicians

AI has the potential to help radiologists improve the efficiency and effectiveness of breast cancer imaging

AI has the potential to help radiologists improve the efficiency and effectiveness of breast cancer imaging

Getty Images

January Lopez, M.D.

January Lopez, M.D.

Headlines around the world the past several months declared that artificial intelligence (AI) is better at detecting breast cancer than human radiologists. Can artificial intelligence really read my own mammogram better than me? That would be intriguing, if it were true. 

In fact, there are no studies to date proving that AI technology reads mammograms more accurately than radiologists in the real-world setting, but what the groundbreaking study1 in the journal Nature did show was that AI could detect breast cancer more accurately than radiologists in a selected set of mammograms, particularly when those sets of mammograms are enriched with lots of breast cancer cases. 

The Promise of AI

Although there is much more research to be done, it grows clearer by the day that AI has great promise in improving breast cancer care. But as we venture out into the expanse of AI technology, it is critical we proceed with caution. Recall the headlines from March 2018 of the Uber fully autonomous car that killed a woman crossing the street in Tempe, Ariz. The car’s AI-based software was unable to identify her as a person crossing the street and struck her at around 40 MPH, according to the Associated Press. Then there was the meme that went viral on social media in 2016 depicting rows and columns of photos of Chihuahuas and blueberry muffins, which so cleverly illustrated the limitations of AI algorithms in correctly identifying some of those images so unmistakably identifiable by any human. Along those same lines, the recent article in Nature also found in its reader study that although AI was able to identify some cancers missed by the study radiologists, at least one cancer that was identified by all six radiologists was missed by the AI system.

So, where do we go from here? AI is good. Radiologists are good. But AI and radiologists are better together. I am seeing that potential firsthand as a principle investigator in an unpublished study Hoag is conducting in collaboration with Therapixel, a company that is not related to the Nature study, specializing in AI for medical imaging. The results of the study fully support this concept of augmented intelligence whereby the best results are obtained when radiologists harness the power of AI to optimize the accuracy and performance of mammographic screening for breast cancer.

AI’s Future in Mammography

Do I believe AI will become better at reading mammograms than me? I don’t know, but I sure hope so. Do I believe AI will make me obsolete? Not in my lifetime. Even if AI reaches its full potential, there are some cancers (i.e. “invisible cancers”) that it will miss simply due to the nature of mammography and other imaging techniques. Diagnosing breast cancer isn’t easy, and it certainly isn’t as simple as interpreting a mammogram. AI can’t lay hands on a person’s body or conduct a meaningful clinical interview that could reveal changes in skin, palpable lumps or discharge that turn out to be indicators of cancer. AI can’t perform breast biopsies or aspirations, and it cannot engage in a complex discussion about a woman’s individual values. Most importantly, AI cannot provide women with compassion and empathy.

I have heard AI described in medicine as analogous to the autopilot function on planes. While autopilot could potentially fly and land a plane on its own, would anyone be willing to board a plane without a human pilot? The same is true for patient care. AI will best be utilized in concert with radiologists who can shape the way it is used, develop standards and identify the technology’s limitations.

Instead of framing the story as “robot versus radiologist,” I believe patients are better served by discussing the powerful potential of putting AI and radiologists together. “AI has the potential to help radiologists improve the efficiency and effectiveness of breast cancer imaging” is not a scintillating headline. But it is a thrilling concept, and it’s one that I am excited to explore.

 

January Lopez, M.D., is a fellowship trained breast imaging specialist, board-certified diagnostic radiologist and Director of Breast Imaging at Hoag Breast Centers.

 

Reference:

1. McKinney, S.M., Sieniek, M., Godbole, V. et al. International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening. Nature 577, 89–94 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6

 

Related Women's Health Content:

Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Enhance the Radiologist and Patient Experience

Artificial Intelligence to Improve the Precision of Mammograms

Related Content

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted every facet of personal life, business operations and healthcare, including breast imaging and breast cancer care.

Getty Images

Feature | Breast Imaging | September 18, 2020 | By Susan Harvey, M.D.
The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted every facet o
As the silos of data and diagnostic imaging PACS systems are being collapsed and secured, the modular enterprise imaging platform approach is gaining significance, offering systemness and security
Feature | Coronavirus (COVID-19) | September 18, 2020 | By Anjum M. Ahmed, M.D., MBBS, MBA, MIS
COVID-19 is now everywhere, and these are the lo
News | Artificial Intelligence | September 16, 2020
September 16, 2020 — Konica Minolta Healthcare Americas, Inc.
Change Healthcare announced innovative new artificial intelligence (AI) models, trained by expert physicians, which extract meaningful diagnostic information from text in EHRs. The first application of this technology will be within the InterQual AutoReview solution, which automates medical necessity reviews using real-time data from EHRs.
News | Artificial Intelligence | September 14, 2020
September 14, 2020 — Change Healthcare announced innovative new...
The Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) has launched its fourth annual artificial intelligence (AI) challenge, a competition among researchers to create applications that perform a clearly defined clinical task according to specified performance measures. The challenge for competitors this year is to create machine-learning algorithms to detect and characterize instances of pulmonary embolism.

Getty Images

News | Artificial Intelligence | September 11, 2020
September 11, 2020 — The Radiological Society of North America (RSNA...
Six months after deployment, the no-show rate of the predictive model was 15.9%, compared with 19.3% in the preceding 12-month preintervention period — corresponding to a 17.2% improvement from the baseline no-show rate (p < 0.0001). The no-show rates of contactable and noncontactable patients in the group at high risk of appointment no-shows as predicted by the model were 17.5% and 40.3%, respectively (p < 0.0001).

Weekly outpatient MRI appointment no-show rates for 1 year before (19.3%) and 6 months after (15.9%) implementation of intervention measures in March 2019, as guided by XGBoost prediction model. Squares denote data points. Courtesy of the  American Roentgen Ray Society (ARRS), American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR)

News | Artificial Intelligence | September 10, 2020
September 10, 2020 — According to ARRS’
Exa Gateway connects hospital radiology departments, radiology practices and teleradiologists through technology and services to enable cost-effective and efficient remote reading capabilities.

Exa Gateway connects hospital radiology departments, radiology practices and teleradiologists through technology and services to enable cost-effective and efficient remote reading capabilities.

News | Teleradiology | September 10, 2020
September 10, 2020 — As radi