Feature | Breast Imaging | October 04, 2018 | By Tracy Accardi

The Evolution of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis

DBT’s trajectory to date has demonstrated that this technology plays an important role in breast cancer screening today and will for years to come

Tracy Accardi

Tracy Accardi

It has been nearly eight years since the world’s first digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) mammography technology was introduced to market to address the limitations of conventional 2-D imaging, and since then, there have been various technological advancements made to DBT. Today, more than half of certified facilities (4,500-plus) have DBT units, according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), officially making DBT the gold standard of care for breast screening. This progress speaks to the widespread positive impact that DBT has had, and continues to have, on both clinicians and patients. As October kicks off Breast Cancer Awareness Month, it’s most appropriate for the radiology industry to reflect upon the evolution of DBT since its inception, its many benefits and where it is headed in the future.

 

Past and Present

Like most technological advancements in healthcare, DBT was first developed to improve its predecessor, traditional 2-D mammography. Two-dimensional imaging, clinicians and medical device manufacturers noticed, had limitations because overlapping tissue in the breast may hide lesions or cause benign areas to appear suspicious. As a result, radiologists were sometimes overlooking some breast cancer diagnoses, and conversely, calling back patients for additional examination who were in fact cancer-free. Upon its introduction to the market, DBT was a major breakthrough because it allowed radiologists to look at thin, high-resolution image slices intended to provide clear renditions of structures in the breast and their spatial relationship with the surrounding breast tissue, thus giving radiologists a more accurate depiction of the breasts’ architecture. Over the years, various manufacturers have made DBT systems and subsequent upgrades to refine their precision, greatly expanding the market.

DBT has not only evolved from a technical perspective, but it has also made great strides when it comes to healthcare policies that give more women access to this technology. In January 2015, for example, Medicare announced it would completely cover DBT. Similarly, in January 2018, Texas implemented legislation mandating that all commercial insurers cover the cost of DBT mammography exams in the state. Today, more than 85 percent of women have access to DBT mammograms thanks to policy changes that occurred. These advances reinforce the idea that this technology has truly replaced 2-D mammography as the standard of care. Additionally, these policy changes reflect exactly just how critical DBT has become in the breast screening process since it came to market. The fact that legislators are so committed to giving women in their community access to this technology is a testament to how much evidence there is that DBT is not only effective, but superior technology for breast cancer screening.

The biggest benefit that DBT has demonstrated to date is its improved accuracy compared to 2-D mammography — a major value given that accuracy is the most crucial factor for early cancer detection. According to a 2014 study that was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), for example, there was a 41 percent increase in the detection of invasive breast cancers and a 29 percent increase in the detection of all breast cancers using DBT compared to traditional mammograms. Similarly, JAMA published a study in 2016 that determined, “Digital breast tomosynthesis screening outcomes are sustainable, with significant recall reduction, increasing cancer cases per recalled patients, and a decline in interval cancers.” Since then, DBT has further proven itself to be an advantageous breast screening tool, especially for women with dense breasts. This is a huge feat given that many women — more than 40 percent of women in the U.S. between the ages of ages 40 and 74 — have heterogeneously dense or extremely dense breasts, according to the American Cancer Society (ACS). Thus, not only has DBT evolved from being a new technology to a device that is clinically proven to be more accurate compared to 2-D mammography, but it has also grown to be a key imaging modality for the many women who have dense breasts. As a result, DBT’s credibility has continued to grow as studies reveal its critical value to breast cancer screening: Its incredible precision makes it a true life-saver.

 

Future Outlook

As more clinical evidence continues to reveal DBT’s superiority, the existing facilities that only use traditional 2-D mammography will fall farther behind. Additionally, as more studies uncover the many factors that can contribute to breast cancer risks and affect screening outcomes, such as breast density, the way DBT is used and how it can be most effective for patients will continue to shift. No two patients are exactly alike, and as medicine as a whole further tailors to that idea so, too, will DBT. Until then, at a minimum, DBT’s trajectory to date has demonstrated that this technology plays an important role in breast cancer screening today and will continue to do so for years to come.

 

Tracy Accardi is global vice president of research and development, breast and skeletal solutions, at Hologic, Inc.

Related Content

Christopher Comstock, M.D., ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group study published in JAMA builds evidence for use of abbreviated MRI in women with dense breasts

Christopher Comstock, M.D., (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center) is the lead author of a paper in JAMA that reports that abbreviated breast MRI detected significantly more (almost 2 and a half times as many) breast cancers than digital breast tomosynthesis (3-D mammography) in average-risk women with dense breasts. Photo courtesy of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

News | Breast Imaging | February 26, 2020
February 26, 2020 — According to a study
Women 75-plus May Not Benefit from Breast Cancer Screening
News | Mammography | February 25, 2020
February 25, 2020 — According to newly published research in an article titled...
Recognized as the “Pulitzer Prize of the business press,” the Jesse H. Neal Award finalists are selected for exhibiting journalistic enterprise, service to the industry and editorial craftsmanship
News | Radiology Business | February 19, 2020
February 19, 2020 — Connectiv, a division of The Software and Information Industry Association (SIIA), has announced
Mammograms of a 49-year-old woman with invasive lobular carcinoma on the right-side breast

Mammograms of a 49-year-old woman with invasive lobular carcinoma on the right-side breast. A small mass with micro-calcifications on the right-side breast was detected correctly by AI with an abnormality score of 96%. This case was recalled by 7 out of 14 radiologists (4 breast radiologists and 3 general radiologists) initially (without AI) and all 14 radiologists recalled this case correctly with the assistance of AI.

News | Artificial Intelligence | February 11, 2020
February 11, 2020 — A new study, published in...
Sponsored Content | Videos | Artificial Intelligence | February 06, 2020
ProFound AI is an FDA-cleared artificial intelligence (AI) system for reading 3-D breast tomosynthesis images.
Feature | Breast Imaging | February 03, 2020 | By Barbara Smith
Women in the United States have a 1 in 8 (or about 13 percent) lifetime risk of being diagnosed with breast cancer du
ringing the cancer bell can do more harm than good, says an ASTRO study

Image courtesy of ASTRO

News | Radiation Oncology | January 27, 2020
January 27, 2020 — It's a scene that some cancer patients dream about: they celebrate the end of a course of radiatio
A 50-y-old postmenopausal woman with fibroadenoma (arrows) in left breast

A 50-y-old postmenopausal woman with fibroadenoma (arrows) in left breast. (A) Unenhanced fat-saturated T1-weighted MRI shows extreme amount of FGT (ACR d). (B) Moderate BPE is seen on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI at 90 s. (C) Mean ADC of breast parenchyma of contralateral breast on diffusion-weighted imaging with ADC mapping is 1.5 × 10?3 mm2/s. (D) On 18F-FDG PET/CT, lesion is not 18F-FDG-avid, and BPU of normal breast parenchyma is relatively high, with SUVmax of 3.2. Photo courtesy of K Pinker, et al., Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

News | PET-MRI | January 27, 2020
January 27, 2020 — Researchers have identified several potentially useful...