Feature | Radiation Dose Management | July 15, 2019 | Niki Fitousi, Ph.D., and An Dedulle

Can CT Image Truncation Cause False Dose Alerts?

Research study suggests image truncation could lead to a larger patient being falsely identified as "standard-sized" and generate a dose alert

Example of an intentionally truncated CT image

Figure 1: Example of an intentionally truncated CT image. The truncation percentage was calculated as the ratio of the patient border touching the field of view to the total patient border (red/(read+blue)). Image courtesy of Qaelum.

Example calculation from truncated images.

Figure 2: Example calculation from truncated images. A message indicates that Water Equivalent Diameter (WED) and Size Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) should be evaluated with care, as the calculation may not be accurate (screenshot from DOSE, Qaelum).

One of the main benefits of a radiation dose management system is the possibility to automatically generate alerts when the dose exceeds certain thresholds. These dose thresholds are mainly based on national Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs), which are defined for a standard-sized patient. An advanced dose management system offers the possibility to automatically select the group of patients by defining a patient size range in terms of weight, effective diameter or Water Equivalent Diameter (WED). As weight is not always filled in, WED, an attenuation-based metric, has become the favourite parameter to indicate patient size. But how accurately is WED calculated? Are we sure that our group of standard-sized patients does not include patients with wrong size calculation? Especially when everything happens automatically, how can we know that a high dose alert does not indicate a bigger patient for whom the size was not correctly calculated?

Automatic calculation of WED by a dose management system can be performed from the computed tomography (CT) localizer image or the reconstructed axial images. The difficulty in using the localizer lies mainly in the different calibration of pixel values in terms of water attenuation between vendors/scanner models/software versions, the inclusion of table attenuation, the use of edge-enhancement filters, and the wrong positioning that can magnify or minify the patient’s image. The reconstructed axial CT image is presented as an accurate way to measure the WED of the patient on the condition that the full patient tissue is included in the image.1,2

But what happens if the axial image is truncated? Can it still be used to estimate the WED?

Our research team performed a study to investigate the effect of image truncation on the calculation of water equivalent diameter for chest and abdomen CT scans. We used a set of CT examinations (286 thorax and 222 abdomen CTs) for which the middle slice was not truncated, and then we intentionally truncated the images up to 50 percent (Figure 1). Non-truncated WED values were compared to truncated values.

The results indicated that for truncation percentages below 20 percent, the underestimation of the WED was rather small and no correction was needed. For larger truncation percentages, the difference between the non-truncated and truncated WED became larger, and correction factors3 could improve the calculation of WED. The results were presented at the European Congress of Medical Physics (ECMP 2018)4.

The study was then broadened to evaluate the effect of truncation on the Size Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) calculation (Figure 2). The results will be presented at the 2019 American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) annual meeting.

Although defining the Diagnostic Reference Levels for a specific patient size range allows the exclusion of overweight and obese patients, the truncation of the image could lead to a bigger patient being falsely identified as “standard-sized” and generate a dose alert. Knowing the effects of truncation on the calculation can assist in excluding dose alerts from the daily workload.

For more information: www.qaelum.com

References

  1. AAPM Report No 204. Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations. Report of AAPM Task Group 204. American Association of Physicists in Medicine, 2011.
  2. AAPM Report No 220. Use of Water Equivalent Diameter for Calculating Patient Size and Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in CT Report of AAPM Task Group 220. American Association of Physicists in Medicine, 2014.
  3. Anam et al. The Size-Specific Dose Estimate (SSDE) for truncated computed tomography images. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 175, 313-320, 2017.
  4. Dedulle et al. Influence of image truncation on the calculation of Water Equivalent Diameter in Computed Tomography examinations. European Congress of Medical Physics, ECMP 2018, 23 – 25 August 2018, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Author's Note: Niki Fitousi, Ph.D., is head of research at Qaelum. An Dedulle is a Ph.D. researcher for Qaelum.

Related Content

CT_Pediatric_Scan_Philips_Vereos_CT_RSNA 2016

Image courtesy of Philips Healthcare

News | Pediatric Imaging | December 10, 2019
December 10, 2019 — More than half of people who received...
With the HiRise, musculoskeletal radiologists and orthopedic specialists will be able to assess alignment of the total leg in three dimensions
News | Computed Tomography (CT) | November 25, 2019
November 25, 2019 — CurveBeam introduced the next level of weight-bearing...
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has cleared the new Somatom X.cite premium single-source computed tomography (CT) scanner from Siemens Healthineers together with the new myExam Companion intelligent user interface concept
News | Computed Tomography (CT) | November 21, 2019
November 21, 2019 — The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has cleared the new Somatom X.cite premium single-source
62-year-old woman with pure ground-glass nodules (GGN). PET/CT fusion image shows pure GGN with tumor maximum standardized uptake value of 2.8 (circle).

62-year-old woman with pure ground-glass nodules (GGN). PET/CT fusion image shows pure GGN with tumor maximum standardized uptake value of 2.8 (circle).

News | PET-CT | November 15, 2019
November 15, 2019 — According to an article published ahead-of-print in the...
Image by Dr. Manuel González Reyes from Pixabay

Image by Dr. Manuel González Reyes from Pixabay 

News | SPECT Imaging | November 08, 2019
November 8, 2019 — Using ground-breaking technology, researchers at the...
Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging has published a special report on lung injury resulting from the use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes), or “vaping.”

Image by Lindsay Fox from Pixabay

News | Computed Tomography (CT) | November 06, 2019
November 6, 2019 — Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging has published a special report on lung injury resulting
Carestream’s DT technology is an upgradable option on the DRX-Evolution Plus System

Carestream’s DT technology is an upgradable option on the DRX-Evolution Plus System.

News | Digital Radiography (DR) | November 04, 2019
November 4, 2019 – Carestream will introduce a three-dimensional extension of general radiography through its...