News | Radiology Business | January 12, 2017

MRI imaging referrals often based on cost, not quality, leading to errors

MRI, imaging diagnostic error rates, lower back, The Spine Journal, Hospital for Special Surgery study

January 12, 2017 — A new clinical study published Dec. 20, 2016, in The Spine Journal reveals significant variability in provider quality as well as imaging diagnostic error rates considerably higher than previously reported in the literature.1

In the study, conducted by the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) and funded by Spreemo Health's Quality Research Institute (QRI), a single patient was sent for a lower-back magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan at 10 different imaging centers over a three-week period. Notably, not a single diagnostic finding — out of 49 distinct findings reported — was identified by all 10 participating centers.

"Diagnostic errors are a well-known problem within the radiological community," said primary author Richard Herzog, M.D., director of spinal imaging at HSS and executive director of Spreemo Health's QRI. "This study reveals the magnitude of that issue for the first time, clearly demonstrating the importance of diagnostic quality for patients and payers."

Peter J. Moley, M.D., assistant attending physiatrist at HSS and a coauthor of the study, noted that variability in the quality of MRI interpretation could yield profoundly different treatment recommendations for the very same patient. "For this patient, recommendations could range from physical therapy to surgery, which shows inter-provider variability is not just an academic problem," said Moley. "It has real-world consequences for patients: An incorrect diagnosis can lead to misdirected therapies, complications and increased disability. This study underscores the need for better standards of diagnostic quality."

For more information: www.thespinejournalonline.com

References

1. Herzog, R., Elgort, D.R., Flanders, A.E., Moley, P.J. "Variability in diagnostic error rates of 10 MRI centers performing lumbar spine MRI examinations on the same patient within a 3-week period," The Spine Journal. Published online Nov. 17, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.11.009


Related Content

News | Computed Tomography (CT)

Feb. 4, 2026 — A new review published in the American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR) finds that advances in CT ...

Time February 04, 2026
arrow
News | Radiology Imaging

Feb. 4, 2026 — The Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) has issued its initial reaction to the British government's ...

Time February 04, 2026
arrow
News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Jan. 27, 2026 — Hyperfine has announced results from the largest data set to date evaluating stroke detection with its ...

Time January 28, 2026
arrow
News | Radiology Education

Jan. 22, 2026—The American Roentgen Ray Society (ARRS) will host a live virtual symposium, "Medical Imaging for ...

Time January 28, 2026
arrow
News | Radiology Imaging

Jan.26, 2026 — SimonMed Imaging has unveiled an updated brand and the launch of SimonMed Longevity, a new division ...

Time January 27, 2026
arrow
News | PET Imaging

Jan. 26, 2026 — Nuclidium, a clinical-stage radiopharmaceutical company developing a proprietary copper-based ...

Time January 27, 2026
arrow
News | Computed Tomography (CT)

Jan. 21, 2026 — Aidoc recently announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cleared the industry's first ...

Time January 23, 2026
arrow
News | Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS)

Jan. 22, 2026 — Qure.ai has received a grant from the Gates Foundation to develop a large open-source multi-modal ...

Time January 23, 2026
arrow
News | Remanufactured Refurbished Equipment

Jan. 11, 2026 — The Global Refurbished Medical Imaging Equipment Market Size is projected to grow at a CAGR of 15.07% ...

Time January 23, 2026
arrow
News | PACS

Jan. 21, 2026 — Fujifilm Healthcare Americas Corp. and Voicebrook, Inc. have announced a strategic partnership to ...

Time January 22, 2026
arrow
Subscribe Now