If you enjoy this content, please share it with a colleague
RELATED CONTENT
September 4, 2020 — According to ARRS' American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR), nearly half (47.7%) of the research ...
August 26, 2020 — An open-access article in ARRS' American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR) established a foundation for ...
August 20, 2020 — According to ARRS' American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR), electronic consultation not only offered ...
August 14, 2020 — According to ARRS' American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR), clinicians do not read a considerable ...
February 12, 2020 — Mobile devices proved both reliable and accurate for the clinical decision to administer IV ...
February 7, 2020 — An ahead-of-print article in the April issue of the American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR) reviewing ...
January 30, 2020 — According to an article published ahead-of-print in the April issue of the American Journal of ...
Although ultrasound remains the primary imaging modality used in prenatal imaging, fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is playing an increasing role in further evaluation of fetuses suspected of congenital anomalies. As 3-T MRI scanners become more common due to their improved image signal-to-noise ratio and anatomical detail, the benefits of 3-T MRI must be weighed against potential risks to the fetus that may result from the higher field strength.