News | Radiology Business | June 07, 2016

Survey Shows Slight Increase in Radiologic Technologist Wages Since 2013

ASRT data show variations based on discipline, region

ASRT survey, radiologic technologists, wages, 2016

June 7, 2016 — The average salaries of radiologic technologists rose by 4.8 percent in the past three years and now average $65,756, according to the American Society of Radiologic Technologists Wage and Salary Survey 2016.

The survey shows that all radiologic technology disciplines and specialty areas saw average annual increases since 2013, with some areas showing greater gains than others.

“Compared to the 2013 wage and salary survey, the 2016 survey shows fairly consistent gains across all practice areas,” said Myke Kudlas, M.Ed., R.T.(R)(QM), CIIP, associate executive director of learning and membership. “Although this is an improvement, the increase only slightly outpaced inflation over the same time period.”

Radiation therapists experienced the largest average gains at 5.3 percent, from a $78,602 average annual salary in 2013 to $82,798 in 2016. Nuclear medicine technologists followed with a 5.2 percent increase, moving from $72,075 to $75,819. Radiographers experienced a 4.5 percent increase from $53,680 to $56,071. Magnetic resonance imaging technologists saw a 3.9 percent increase from $68,384 to $71,063.

Other increases include sonographers at 3.7 percent, computed tomography technologists at 3.5 percent and mammographers at 3.4 percent.

The disciplines with the highest reported mean compensation were medical dosimetry at $106,777, and registered radiologic assistant/RPA at $100,311.

In addition to wage variations for different practice areas, salaries also fluctuate from region to region, according to the survey. On average, California RTs have the highest annual compensation at $92,396, followed by technologists in the District of Columbia at $81,083. Technologists in Alabama earned the lowest base annual compensation at $52,230.

The survey also highlights RTs’ satisfaction with their compensation. Responses show that nearly half of respondents, 49.4 percent, are either satisfied or very satisfied with their pay. However, 33 percent of respondents said they had not received a raise in the past 12 months.

The ASRT sent questionnaires in February 2016 to all ASRT members with an email address in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. A total of 25,379 radiologic technologists returned completed questionnaires, resulting in a 12.4 percent return rate.

The ASRT conducts the Wage and Salary Survey every three years and has captured longitudinal data since 2004.

For more information: www.asrt.org

Related Content

Image by rawpixel from Pixabay

Image by rawpixel from Pixabay 

Feature | Radiology Business | July 18, 2019 | By Stefanie Manack and Judy Zakutny
Approximately 30 percent of a hospital or health system’s profit comes from imaging according, to...
CMS Proposes New Alternative Payment Model for Radiation Oncology
News | Radiation Oncology | July 17, 2019
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a proposal for an advanced alternative payment model (APM)...
Routine scan of abdomen pelvis taken with the UW-Madison’s Revolution 256 CT scanner using the FDA-cleared reconstruction algorithm, called TrueFidelity.

Routine scan of abdomen pelvis taken with the UW-Madison’s Revolution 256 CT scanner using the FDA-cleared reconstruction algorithm, called TrueFidelity. UW-Madison was the first site in the U.S. to get this technology. Its use is now being integrated into UW CT protocols. Image courtesy of Timothy P. Szczykutowicz

Feature | Computed Tomography (CT) | July 12, 2019 | By Greg Freiherr
When providers develop their own imaging protocols, they are wasting time and money, according to...

Image courtesy of GE Healthcare

Feature | Radiology Business | July 03, 2019 | By Jeffrey Hoffmeister, M.D.
Burnout in the medical profession is not uncommon, particularly as clinicians have become more overwhelmed by growing

stock.adobe.com / netsign

Feature | Radiology Business | July 02, 2019 | By William W. Pinsky, M.D., FAAP, FACC, and Mandeep R. Mehra, M.D., MBBS, MSc, FRCP
As we strive to process today’s successive news cycles involving negative reports about immigration, it is easy for m
A 3-D printed model (left) and a model constructed in augmented reality (right), both of a kidney with a tumor. In both models, the kidney is clear; the tumor is visible in purple on the AR model and in white on the 3-D printed model.

A 3-D printed model (left) and a model constructed in augmented reality (right), both of a kidney with a tumor. In both models, the kidney is clear; the tumor is visible in purple on the AR model and in white on the 3-D printed model. Photo courtesy of Nicole Wake, Ph.D.

Feature | Advanced Visualization | July 02, 2019 | By Jeff Zagoudis
Three-dimensional (3-D) printing and...
The Acuson Sequoia with Deep Abdominal Transducer (DAX) scanning a 600 pound patient.

The Acuson Sequoia with Deep Abdominal Transducer (DAX) scanning a 600 pound patient.

Sponsored Content | Case Study | Ultrasound Imaging | July 01, 2019
“With our present technology, we often struggle with large patients,” said Richard G.
David Anderson at SIIM

David Anderson presents information about the development of artificial Intelligence (AI) at SIIM 2019 as his father, Charles, looks on from a front row seat. The father-son team presented information at the SIIM annual meeting about their use of relatively shallow Deep Learning networks to analyze chest radiographs with AI.

Feature | Information Technology | July 01, 2019 | By Greg Freiherr
Two simple neural networks are better than one complex one, according to a father-son team of entrepreneurs.