News | Women's Health | August 20, 2019

New study suggests ways to enhance pregnancy screening measures to limit fetal exposure to controversial contrast agent

Some Pregnant Women Are Exposed to Gadolinium in Early Pregnancy

August 20, 2019 — A small but concerning number of women are exposed to a commonly used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent early in their pregnancy, likely before many of them are aware that they are pregnant, according to a study published in the journal Radiology.1 The results support adherence to effective pregnancy screening measures to help reduce inadvertent exposures to these contrast agents during early pregnancy.

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are used in as many as 45 percent of MRI exams in the United States to improve the visualization of organs and tissue. Recent evidence shows that trace levels of gadolinium may be retained in the body after the MRI, although the implications of this are not yet understood.

Gadolinium can cross the placenta and enter the fetal circulation. The safety of GBCAs in pregnant women has not been established, and their use during pregnancy is not recommended unless essential to the health of the woman or fetus. Available data from cohort studies and case reports have revealed inconsistent findings regarding the association between gadolinium and adverse fetal outcomes.

To obtain a more precise idea of the prevalence of GBCA exposure among pregnant women, study lead author Steven Bird, Pharm.D., Ph.D., of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Division of Epidemiology, and colleagues analyzed data on U.S. pregnancies resulting in live births between 2006 and 2017. The data was collected from 16 partners of the FDA’s Sentinel System, a program that allows for active surveillance of healthcare data from multiple sources to monitor the safety of regulated medical products.

The data revealed exposures to GBCAs in 5,457 of 4,692,744 live births, a number corresponding to one in 860 pregnancies. Most of the exposures came from contrast MRI examinations of the head, although the number of pelvic and abdominal MRIs were also noteworthy. Almost three-quarters of exposures occurred during the first trimester. The results strongly suggested that inadvertent exposure to GBCAs may occur before pregnancy is recognized.

“Unintended fetal exposures to gadolinium can occur during early pregnancy among women who are not yet aware they are pregnant. Increased attention to existing pregnancy screening measures may help reduce inadvertent exposures to gadolinium contrast,” Bird said.

The FDA has advised all MRI centers to provide a medication guide to outpatients during their first gadolinium contrast administration, stating that pregnant women and young children may be at increased risk from gadolinium staying in the body.

The researchers suggested several ways radiology imaging centers might avoid inadvertent administration of GBCAs to pregnant women. Among the tools are: 

  • A safety screening form asking about the potential for pregnancy; 

  • Direct questioning of women by radiologic technologists regarding pregnancy; 

  • Prominently displayed signs asking women to notify radiology staff if they may be pregnant; and 

  • Pregnancy testing when appropriate.

The FDA is continuing to monitor reports of adverse events associated with gadolinium exposure in utero. While this study was not designed to assess health outcomes of this early exposure for women and/or infants, the FDA is collaborating on and funding a study to evaluate potential risk for stillbirth and other neonatal adverse effects following in utero exposure to gadolinium in a large group of pregnant Medicaid beneficiaries.

For more information: www.pubs.rsna.org/journal/radiology

 

Reference 

1. Bird S.T., Gelperin K., Sahin L., et al. First-Trimester Exposure to Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents: A Utilization Study of 4.6 Million U.S. Pregnancies. Radiology, published online Aug. 20, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019190563


Related Content

News | Ultrasound Women's Health

February 8, 2023 — Boston Imaging, the United States headquarters of Samsung’s digital radiography and ultrasound ...

Time February 08, 2023
arrow
Videos | Information Technology

A discussion on macro trends and the future of medical imaging with Jef Williams, managing partner, Paragon Consulting ...

Time February 07, 2023
arrow
News | Breast Density

February 6, 2023 — Awareness of breast density appears to increase one’s perceived breast cancer risk for a short time ...

Time February 06, 2023
arrow
News | Radiology Business

February 2, 2023 — Five additional imaging centers across Allegheny Health Network (AHN) have been recognized by the ...

Time February 02, 2023
arrow
News | Radiation Oncology

February 2, 2023 — The V Foundation, a top cancer research charity, has announced the establishment of a new grant ...

Time February 02, 2023
arrow
News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

February 1, 2023 — According to an accepted manuscript published in ARRS’ American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR), MRI ...

Time February 01, 2023
arrow
News | MRI Breast

February 1, 2023 — Compared to other common supplemental screening methods, breast MRI was superior at detecting breast ...

Time February 01, 2023
arrow
News | Computed Tomography (CT)

January 30, 2023 — Photon-counting detector CT reduces the amount of contrast needed for CT angiography (CTA) while ...

Time January 30, 2023
arrow
News | Stereotactic Breast Imaging

January 27, 2023 — According to an accepted manuscript published in ARRS’ American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR), both ...

Time January 27, 2023
arrow
Videos | PACS

Konica Minolta Healthcare recently announced it is working with Amazon Web Services to offer its cloud-based Exa ...

Time January 27, 2023
arrow
Subscribe Now