News | Women's Health | August 20, 2020

Single-dose radiotherapy replaces need for extra hospital visits, with benefits for patient safety and well-being

Single-dose radiotherapy replaces need for extra hospital visits, with benefits for patient safety and well-being

Getty Images


August 20, 2020— For most women with early breast cancer, a single dose of targeted radiotherapy during surgery is just as effective as conventional radiotherapy, which requires several visits to hospital after surgery.

This combination of targeted radiotherapy (restricted to the area around the tumour) given immediately after surgery is called targeted intraoperative radiotherapy. Conventional radiotherapy involves repeat doses to the whole breast over several days after surgery.

The findings, published by The BMJ today, show that intraoperative radiotherapy is associated with around an 80% chance of avoiding a full course of conventional radiotherapy, fewer side effects and no difference in survival or likelihood of the cancer returning.

An international team of researchers set out to compare the long term effects of targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (TARGIT-IORT) with conventional whole breast external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for women with early breast cancer.

Results from an earlier report of single-dose targeted intraoperative radiotherapy were promising, but doctors have been waiting for longer term results before adopting the procedure more widely.

The new findings are based on 2,298 women, aged 45 or older, who were eligible for breast conservation surgery (lumpectomy) at 32 centres in 10 countries in the UK, Europe, Australia, USA and Canada.

Between March 2000, and June 2012, 1,140 women were randomised to receive targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (TARGIT-IORT) and 1,158 received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).

TARGIT-IORT was given as a single dose immediately after surgery as part of the same operation and under the same anaesthetic, while EBRT was given as a standard daily dose for 3-6 weeks after surgery.

The long term results show that TARGIT-IORT was no worse than EBRT. After five years of monitoring, the local recurrence risk was 2.11% for TARGIT-IORT compared with 0.95% for EBRT. This difference of 1.16% is not considered clinically significant.

In the first five years after surgery, there were 13 additional local recurrences (24 out of 1,140 vs 11 out of 1,158) but 14 fewer deaths (42 out of 1,140 vs 56 out of 1,158) with TARGIT-IORT compared with EBRT.

Over a longer follow-up period (average 8.6 years, maximum 18.9 years) there were no statistically significant differences in local recurrence-free survival (167 vs 147 events), mastectomy-free survival (170 vs 175 events), overall survival (110 vs 131 events) and breast cancer deaths (65 vs 57 events).

Deaths from other causes were significantly lower (45 vs 74 events) with TARGIT-IORT compared with EBRT. The major risk factors for such deaths (age and body mass index) were well matched between the groups.

The researchers point to some study limitations, such as possible overdiagnosis of non-invasive local recurrence affecting the results, and not collecting all the background risk factors for deaths from non breast cancer causes. However strengths included the randomised design, a large sample size with a long duration and high level of complete follow up, suggesting that the results are reliable and robust.

As such, the researchers say that for the large proportion of early breast cancer patients "risk adapted immediate single-dose TARGIT-IORT during lumpectomy is an effective alternative to EBRT, with comparable long-term efficacy for cancer control, and lower non-breast-cancer mortality."

Single-dose TARGIT-IORT during lumpectomy "should be accessible to healthcare providers and discussed with patients when surgery for breast cancer is being planned," they conclude.

For more information: www.bmj.com


Related Content

News | Radiation Therapy

February 2, 2023 — DenseBreast-info.org (DBI) announced the results of the study, “Effect of an Educational Intervention ...

Time February 02, 2023
arrow
News | Radiation Therapy

February 2, 2023 — RefleXion Medical, a therapeutic oncology company, today announced the U.S. Food and Drug ...

Time February 02, 2023
arrow
News | Radiation Oncology

February 2, 2023 — The V Foundation, a top cancer research charity, has announced the establishment of a new grant ...

Time February 02, 2023
arrow
News | MRI Breast

February 1, 2023 — Compared to other common supplemental screening methods, breast MRI was superior at detecting breast ...

Time February 01, 2023
arrow
News | Radiation Therapy

February 1, 2023 — Radiotherapy is a crucial component of cancer treatment, used to shrink or destroy tumors with high ...

Time February 01, 2023
arrow
Feature | Radiology Business | By Melinda Taschetta-Millane

Here is a recap of what ITN viewers found most interesting during the month of January: 1. A Look at the Changes in 2023 ...

Time February 01, 2023
arrow
News | Radiation Therapy

January 31, 2023 — Age-based heuristics can lead to large differences in breast cancer treatment based on small ...

Time January 31, 2023
arrow
Webinar | Information Technology

Postpandemic staffing shortages and increased volumes require radiologists to do more with less, exacerbating burnout ...

Time January 30, 2023
arrow
News | Stereotactic Breast Imaging

January 27, 2023 — According to an accepted manuscript published in ARRS’ American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR), both ...

Time January 27, 2023
arrow
News | Artificial Intelligence

January 26, 2023 — MedCognetics, Inc., an Artificial Intelligence (AI) software firm, announced that it has been awarded ...

Time January 26, 2023
arrow
Subscribe Now