News | Breast Density | February 10, 2021

Risk-based Breast Cancer Screening

Screening strategy based on baseline breast density at age 40 may be effective and cost-effective for reducing breast cancer mortality

Screening strategy based on baseline breast density at age 40 may be effective and cost-effective for reducing breast cancer mortality

Getty Images

February 10, 2021 — A mammography screening strategy based on a baseline breast density measure at age 40 may be the most effective and cost effective way to reduce breast cancer mortality. Current breast cancer screening guidelines recommend that mammography begin at age 50 for women at average risk. Findings from a microsimulation modeling study are published in Annals of Internal Medicine.

High breast density not only has a masking effect on mammogram reading, it also increases the risk of breast cancer. The Breast Density Notification Act requires providers to inform women who have a mammogram whether they have dense breasts. However, most women do not know their breast density classification until after their first mammogram at age 50.

Researchers from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and Fred Hutch Cancer Center used a microsimulation model to compare the health outcomes and cost-effectiveness of 7 breast cancer screening strategies: no screening, biennial screening between age 50-75, triennial screening between 50-75, and four density-stratified strategies (two with baseline mammogram at age 40, and the other two at age 50). All density-stratified strategies assigned annual screening to women with dense breasts, and biennial or triennial starting at age 50 for women without dense breasts.

The model suggests that the strategy with a baseline breast density assessment at age 40, followed by annual screening between age 40 and 75 for women with dense breasts and biennial screening between 50 and 75 for women without dense breasts had the greatest reduction in breast cancer mortality, but was also associated with a larger number of mammograms lifetime and higher rates of false positives and overdiagnosis. A cost-effectiveness analysis that considered the benefits and harms showed that when compared to non-density-stratified biennial screening age 50 - 75, the above density-stratified strategy yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of about $36,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), which is considered cost-effective.

The authors of an accompany editorial from the University of California, San Francisco argue that breast density is an important risk factor to include in risk-based screening strategies because it is both a strong and prevalent risk factor accounting for a large proportion of breast cancers. However, it should be combined with age and other risk factors when developing risk-based screening strategies that optimize benefits and minimize harms. The editorialists believe that until a more robust risk-based strategy is identified, data supports screening biennially from ages 50 to 74 years.

For more information: www.acponline.org

Related Content

News | Artificial Intelligence | May 11, 2021
May 11, 2021 — Whiterabbit, an AI technology company focused on early...
A 37-year-old woman developed a new, palpable left supraclavicular lymphadenopathy lump five days after her first dose of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine in the left arm. On the day of vaccination, the patient was asymptomatic. This is an example of how the vaccine can mimic cancer and swollen lymph nodes. Image used with permission of RSNA.

A 37-year-old woman developed a new, palpable left supraclavicular lymphadenopathy lump five days after her first dose of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine in the left arm. On the day of vaccination, the patient was asymptomatic. This is an example of how the vaccine can mimic cancer and swollen lymph nodes. Read more about this case study. Image used with permission of RSNA.

Feature | Coronavirus (COVID-19) | May 03, 2021 | By Dave Fornell, Editor
While the mass COVID-19 vaccinat
A 63-year-old multiple #myeloma patient, with skeletal pain. New #FDG avid axillary #lymphadenopathy 62 days (9 weeks) after second #mRNA #vaccination dose. Image used with permission of the Radiological Society of North America (#RSNA)

A 63-year-old multiple myeloma patient, with skeletal pain. New FDG avid axillary lymphadenopathy 62 days (9 weeks) after second mRNA vaccination dose. Image used with permission of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)

Feature | Coronavirus (COVID-19) | April 29, 2021 | By Melinda Taschetta-Millane
ACR releases 13 new topics and five revised topics to support referring physicians and other providers in making the most appropriate imaging or treatment decisions
News | Radiology Imaging | April 26, 2021
April 26, 2021 — The American College of Radiology (ACR) released an update to its...
The Imagio Breast Imaging System combines laser light and sound with conventional ultrasound technology to provide fused functional and anatomic images (referred to as optoacoustic/ultrasound or OA/US) in real time, increasing confidence in diagnostic accuracy.

The Imagio Breast Imaging System combines laser light and sound with conventional ultrasound technology to provide fused functional and anatomic images (referred to as optoacoustic/ultrasound or OA/US) in real time, increasing confidence in diagnostic accuracy.

News | Breast Imaging | April 23, 2021
April 23, 2021 — The U.S.