News | May 05, 2010

Remote Imaging Equipment Services Cut Costs

May 5, 2010 - Automated links to equipment service providers are helping U.S. hospitals control the costs of maintenance and repair for their diagnostic imaging equipment.

IMV Ltd. surveyed 401 radiology and biomedical engineering managers from a bed-size adjusted sample of hospitals throughout located throughout the United States.

“For example, for hospital-based CT scanners with 64 or more slices, roughly 84 percent of service contracts cover remote diagnostics from the service provider. Perhaps more surprisingly, the service provider is actually able to repair equipment software remotely in two-thirds of such service contracts,” reported Mary C. Patton, director, market research at IMV.

The report also said radiology administrators and biomed managers saw remote diagnostics and software repair as helping them limit the high cost of visits by outside service engineers.

"At the same time, this trend necessitates greater involvement from hospital IT departments to enable permissions and security checks for service vendors to access hospital networks,” said Patton.

Another trend identified in the study was a movement toward shared service agreements with the in-house biomedical engineering staff taking the first service call.

"As a result, hospitals are trying to negotiate as much training for their in-house biomed staff as possible at the time of the imaging equipment purchase,” said Patton.

The report, entitled "2010 Diagnostic Imaging Equipment Service Arrangements: The Hospital Executive’s Perspective," provides insights into the size, composition, and trends in the U.S. market for hospital-based diagnostic imaging equipment service contracts for 10 modalities.

Other key findings of the report include:
• Onsite coverage contracted with original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) still represent over 60 percent of all imaging equipment service agreements, despite available alternatives.

• The markets for service contracts covering general X-ray and ultrasound equipment are much less concentrated than those for other imaging modalities, such as CT and MRI equipment.

• Despite the growth of third-party parts providers for imaging equipment, no non-OEM parts vendor represents more than 15 percent of imaging equipment parts purchases.

For more information: www.imvinfo.com

Related Content

Houston Methodist Hospital Enters Multi-Year Technology and Research Agreement With Siemens Healthineers
News | Imaging | August 17, 2017
Houston Methodist Hospital and Siemens Healthineers have entered into a multi-year agreement to bring cutting-edge...
Carestream Launches MR Brain Perfusion and Diffusion Modules for Vue PACS
Technology | Advanced Visualization | August 16, 2017
Carestream Health recently introduced new MR (magnetic resonance) Brain Perfusion and MR Brain Diffusion modules that...
ISMRM Issues Guidelines for MRI Gadolinium Contrast Agents
News | Contrast Media | August 15, 2017
The International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM) has provided new guidance in the use of contrast...
Patient Complexity, Subspecialization Impact List Prices for Radiologists' Services
News | Business | August 15, 2017
A new study by the Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute finds that patient condition complexity and...
Upcoming radiology conferences, meetings and events.
News | August 14, 2017
ITN maintains a comprehensive listing of radiology specialty meetings on its website at ...
Four Blue Cross Blue Shield Companies Issue Positive Medical Policies on HeartFlow FFRct Analysis
News | Computed Tomography (CT) | August 09, 2017
HeartFlow Inc. announced that four Blue Cross Blue Shield companies have each issued a positive medical policy for the...
MRI Reveals Striking Brain Differences in People with Genetic Autism

Example images for a control participant , a deletion carrier, and a duplication carrier. In the sagittal image of the deletion carrier, the thick corpus callosum, dens and craniocervical abnormality, and cerebellar ectopia are shown. For the duplication carrier, the sagittal image shows the thin corpus callosum and the axial image shows the increased ventricle size and decreased white matter volume. Image courtesy of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA).

News | Neuro Imaging | August 09, 2017
August 9, 2017 — In the first major study of its kind, researchers using magnetic...
ACR Establishes Education Committee for Patient- and Family-Centered Care
News | Patient Engagement | August 09, 2017
Members of the new Education Committee of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Commission on Patient- and Family-...
ACR Annual Conference on Quality and Safety Offers Strategies for Radiology Practices
News | Business | August 08, 2017
The American College of Radiology (ACR) Annual Conference on Quality and Safety, scheduled for Oct. 13-14 in Boston,...
Overlay Init