News | January 20, 2015

PotentiaMED Advisor Highlights Problems with Cancer Clinical Trials

Poor representative patient selection, exclusion of mitigating factors among issues to address

January 20, 2015 — The validity of randomized clinical trials in cancer has recently been called into question as many healthcare professionals are decrying the “experimerical” nature of these studies.

Jay F. Piccirillo, M.D., FACS, medical advisor for PotentiaMED, said, “The very nature of these studies is biased because they are often sponsored by pharmaceutical and device companies who have a vested interest in ensuring the studies have a positive outcome.”

 Piccirillo outlines the reasons randomized clinical trials are problematic:

  • Randomized clinical trials enroll younger and less racially diverse patients of the cancer population. “We know that roughly 53 percent of cancer patients are over the age of 65,” said Piccirillo, “Yet less than 33 percent of patients in the study are in this age group. Hence, we are getting data that is based on people who are much younger than the majority of our patients. Additionally, most of the people studied are white, meaning that we don’t have much data on people of color.”
  • Randomized clinical trials don’t consider comorbidity. “We have a saying in cancer treatment: ‘Sicker people die sooner,’” said Piccirillo. “This means that cancer patients with coexisting lung disease, heart disease, diabetes or other illnesses are less likely to improve with treatment and more likely to succumb quicker than cancer patients with less severe comorbidity. However, randomized clinical trials often exclude patients with comorbid ailments and so the results are not applicable to a large number of cancer patients.”
  • Randomized clinical trials don’t consider quality of life. “Randomized clinical trials seek ‘objective’ markers such as survival and tumor recurrence rates,” said Piccirillo, “These are important endpoints, however, patients increasingly also want information on quality of life and this important data simply isn’t available through clinical trials.”
  • Randomized clinical trials aren't publicized equally. “It is an inescapable truth that many of these trials are performed by companies who have a vested interest in the outcome,” said Piccirillo. “As such, they only tend to submit for publication and publicize positive findings. In fact, one study of selective publication bias found that 97 oercent (37 of 38) of positive trials were published while only 33 percent (8 of 24) of negative trials were published. This means that clinicians and patients who review the published medical literature receive a biased impression of treatment effectiveness.

 

“The reality is that only four percent of adults with cancer are involved in randomized clinical trials, yet healthcare professionals are using this information to determine the treatment for the other 96 percent of the population,” said Piccirillo. 

PotentiaMED was founded in 2009 with the goal of collecting and supplying invaluable treatment information for patients, doctors, hospitals, insurance providers, medical technology, and insurance providers. The PotentiaMED database offers patients all the data they need at their fingertips, from life expectancy to side effects to quality of life to future risk.

For more information: www.potentiamed.com

Related Content

Image courtesy of Philips Healthcare

News | Clinical Trials | July 19, 2018
The use of computed tomography (CT) scans has increased dramatically over the last two decades. CT scans greatly...
CT Decision Instrument Reliably Guides Pediatric Blunt Trauma imaging Decisions

This is a four-site prospective observational cohort. Image courtesy of Kirsty Challen, B.Sc., MBCHB, MRES, Ph.D., Lancashire Teaching Hospitals, United Kingdom.

News | Clinical Decision Support | July 18, 2018
A new study finds The Pediatric NEXUS Head Computed Tomography (CT) Decision Instrument (DI) reliably identifies blunt...
Study Points to Need for Performance Standards for EHR Usability and Safety
News | Electronic Medical Records (EMR) | July 18, 2018
A novel new study provides compelling evidence that the design, development and implementation of electronic health...
Artificial Intelligence Provides Faster, Clearer MRI Scans

A new artificial-intelligence-based approach to image reconstruction, called AUTOMAP, yields higher quality images from less data, reducing radiation doses for CT and PET and shortening scan times for MRI. Shown here are MR images reconstructed from the same data with conventional approaches, at left, and AUTOMAP, at right. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital

News | Artificial Intelligence | July 17, 2018
A research team with funding from the National Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) has...
Study Shows Biomarker Panel Boosts Lung Cancer Risk Assessment for Smokers
News | Lung Cancer | July 16, 2018
A four-protein biomarker blood test improves lung cancer risk assessment over existing guidelines that rely solely upon...
Breast Cancer Follow-up Imaging Varies Widely
News | Breast Imaging | July 13, 2018
July 13, 2018 — Follow-up imaging for women...
Lack of Insurance Coverage Delaying Proton Therapy Clinical Trials
News | Proton Therapy | July 12, 2018
Randomized clinical trials are the gold standard of cancer research and can shed light on whether innovative, new...
Breast Cancer Studies Ignore Race, Socioeconomic Factors
News | Women's Health | July 11, 2018
A new commentary appearing in the July issue of Cancer Causes & Control points to evidence that social factors help...
High-Strength MRI May Release Mercury from Amalgam Dental Fillings
News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) | July 05, 2018
Exposure to ultra-high-strength magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may release toxic mercury from amalgam fillings in...
Overlay Init