News | Digital Pathology | January 25, 2019

New Pathology Guideline Advances Accuracy in Breast Cancer Testing

Evidence-based guideline from College of American Pathologists helps labs use quantitative image analysis in HER2 immunohistochemistry testing

New Pathology Guideline Advances Accuracy in Breast Cancer Testing

January 25, 2019 — The College of American Pathologists (CAP) published the first-ever evidence-based clinical practice guideline to help laboratories use quantitative image analysis (QIA) in HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing for breast cancer. The guideline was published in an early online edition of the Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.1

QIA is the computer algorithm-assisted detection of specific features in an image following the digitalization of a glass slide image. Advancements in genomics, computing and imaging technology are spurring new opportunities to use QIA for diagnostic testing.  And while it has been shown to improve consistency and accuracy of interpretation compared to manual scoring by pathologists, the lack of a clinical guideline has been a barrier to wider QIA adoption.

"We set out to bridge the gap between technology and clinical practice with recommendations based on expert review of published literature," said project chair Marilyn M. Bui, M.D., Ph.D., FCAP, of the Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Fla. "The recommendations will aid laboratories to ensure that diagnoses are accurate and consistent, which is essential to each patient's prognosis and treatment planning."

To develop the guideline, the CAP convened an expert panel of pathologists and histotechnologists with expertise in digital pathology, immunohistochemistry, quality management and breast pathology. The panel systematically reviewed more than 250 relevant articles and relied on evidence from more than 65 to develop the guideline's 11 recommendations. The guideline development process also included an open public comment period to include comments from professional associations and individuals, feedback from the guideline advisory panel, and independent peer review from a panel of CAP members.

Notably, the guideline recommends steps to validate QIA before implementing it, and steps for ongoing maintenance and evaluation so that quality is controlled and assured. Additionally, it recommends that laboratories should validate their QIA results for clinical use by comparing them to an alternative, validated method(s) such as HER2 in-situ hybridization methods or consensus images for HER2 IHC. The American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP) has endorsed the guideline through informed consideration by the ASCP Commission on Science, Technology & Policy.

The guideline is available at no charge on cap.org. Additional resources including an instructional presentation and summary of the recommendations are also available.

For more information: www.cap.org

Related Digital Pathology Content

Roche Launches uPath Enterprise Digital Pathology Software

Reference

1. Bui M.M., Riben M.W., Allison K.H., et al. Quantitative Image Analysis of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry for Breast Cancer. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0378-CP

Related Content

#COVID19 #Coronavirus #2019nCoV #Wuhanvirus #SARScov2
News | Mammography | March 25, 2020
March 25, 2020 — The...
Instant triage capability could potentially speed up diagnosis of COVID-19 individuals and ensure resources allocated properly.
News | Artificial Intelligence | March 23, 2020
March 23, 2020 — behold.ai announced that its artificial intellige
The 2020 Society of Breast Imaging/American College of Radiology (SBI/ACR) annual symposium has been cancelled, and the event rescheduled for April 8-11, 2020, in Savannah, Ga. #COVID19 #Coronavirus #2019nCoV #Wuhanvirus #SBI20
News | Society of Breast Imaging (SBI) | March 16, 2020
March 16, 2020 — The 2020 Society of Breast Imaging/American College of Radiology (...
DBT, sometimes called 3-D mammography, emerged in the last decade as a powerful tool for breast cancer screening

Images in a 57-year-old woman noted to have "good prognosis" invasive cancer detected at digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening. (a) Craniocaudal view of the left breast obtained with the two-dimensional digital mammography (DM) portion of the DM/DBT screening study demonstrates a subtle area of distortion in the medial left breast. (b) Single-slice image from the left craniocaudal DBT portion of the screening study shows an area of bridging distortion (circle). (c) Electronically enlarged image of the area of concern seen on the left craniocaudal view in a single DBT slice as shown in b. (d) Targeted US scan demonstrates two small adjacent irregular solid masses. US-guided core biopsy yielded an invasive carcinoma of the tubular subtype that was estrogen receptor positive, progesterone receptor positive, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative. The results of the sentinel node biopsy were negative. Image courtesy of the Radiological Society of North America

News | Breast Imaging | March 11, 2020
March 11, 2020 — A new study published in the journal ...
SoftVue image stacks of sound speed, as shown for cases ranging across the four Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast density categories

Example: SoftVue image stacks of sound speed, as shown for cases ranging across the four Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast density categories ((a), fatty; (b), scattered; (c), heterogeneously dense; (d), extremely dense). Note the quantitative scale indicating that absolute measurements are obtained. Image courtesy of MDPI

News | Breast Imaging | March 10, 2020
March 10, 2020 — ...