May 25, 2010 - May 25, 2010 - Radiologists using decision support helped decrease the percentage of low-yield exams from 5.4 percent of total number of requests to 1.9 percent of total requests, according to a study appearing in the June issue of Radiology.

The study, “Increasing the Appropriateness of Outpatient Imaging: Effects of a Barrier to Ordering Low-Yield Examinations," measured how a new rule preventing medical support staff from completing orders for outpatient imaging exams that were likely to be negative resulted in a marked decrease in low-yield exams for patients.

Many medical institutions request and schedule outpatient diagnostic imaging exams through use of web-based radiology order entry systems. Some systems offer real-time feedback, called decision support, on the appropriateness of the exams being ordered. When entering the desired examination into the system, the physician or support staff must also enter clinical information justifying the order. Based on that information, the decision-support system provides a yield score ranging from one to nine. The score indicates the likelihood that the selected exam will yield valuable diagnostic or positive results for this set of clinical circumstances.

Following American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria, a score of one to three is considered low yield. The user is then given the opportunity to cancel the order or select a different examination. However, because medical support staff do not make clinical decisions, they are less likely to cancel or revise an order without additional clarification from the physician.

To address this problem, Massachusetts General Hospital instituted a rule preventing medical support staff from completing computerized orders for outpatient CT, MRI and nuclear medicine examinations that received low-yield decision support scores.

“We developed this strategy to encourage more clinician ‘hands-on’ use of the system,” said Vartan M. Vartanians, M.D., clinical research associate in the Department of Radiology at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. “With greater physician involvement, fewer low-yield exams are ordered.”

After the change, the proportion of total examination requests by physicians directly logging into the system more than doubled from 26 percent to 54 percent of the total number of requests, while the percentage of low-yield exams requested decreased from 5.4 percent of total number of requests to 1.9 percent of total requests.

“Physicians need to use the decision support system for it to be effective, but getting them to do so can be difficult,” Dr. Vartanians said. “Our work demonstrates that a minimally disruptive alteration in the radiology order entry system can encourage direct physician involvement, and improve patient care by reducing the number of low-yield examinations.”

Reference: “Increasing the Appropriateness of Outpatient Imaging: Effects of a Barrier to Ordering Low-Yield Examinations.” Collaborating on this paper with Dr. Vartanians were Christopher L. Sistrom, M.D., M.P.H., Jeffrey B. Weilburg, M.D., Daniel I. Rosenthal, M.D., and James H. Thrall, M.D. Radiology.

For more information: www.rsna.org


Related Content

News | FDA

March 6, 2024 — Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (Lantheus), a radiopharmaceutical company, has announced that the U.S. Food and ...

Time March 06, 2024
arrow
News | FDA

February 12, 2024 — Proscia, a leading provider of digital and computational pathology solutions, has received 510(k) ...

Time February 12, 2024
arrow
News | Artificial Intelligence

September 20, 2023 — Medical imaging artificial intelligence (AI) company Annalise.ai has announced that the results ...

Time September 20, 2023
arrow
News | SNMMI

June 29, 2023 — A study presented this week during the 2023 Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) ...

Time June 29, 2023
arrow
News | Digital Pathology

September 13, 2022 — Deciphex, a Dublin, Ireland-based provider of digital pathology software and services, has ...

Time September 13, 2022
arrow
News | Clinical Decision Support

April 22, 2021 — Change Healthcare unveiled InterQual 2021, the latest edition of the company’s flagship clinical ...

Time April 22, 2021
arrow
News | Clinical Decision Support

April 2, 2021 — Elsevier, a global leader in research publishing and information analytics, announced a partnership with ...

Time April 02, 2021
arrow
News | Clinical Decision Support

June 16, 2020 — Philips and The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center announced a collaboration to provide ...

Time June 16, 2020
arrow
News | Clinical Decision Support

March 13, 2020 — IBM Watson Health and EBSCO Information Services (EBSCO) announced a strategic collaboration aimed ...

Time March 13, 2020
arrow
News | Clinical Decision Support

December 26, 2019 — Effective Jan. 1, 2020, new regulations under the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) ...

Time December 26, 2019
arrow
Subscribe Now