For the first time, researchers led by a team from the UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center used prostate cancer patients’ DNA to create a model that appears to predict who will have side effects from radiation.   

January 19, 2022 — For the first time, researchers led by a team from the UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center used prostate cancer patients’ DNA to create a model that appears to predict who will have side effects from radiation.   

While radiation treatment is a very effective therapy for prostate cancer, around one in six men experiences more frequent or painful urination as a lingering side effect, otherwise known as genitourinary toxicity.   

These disruptive side effects can occur no matter what type of radiation a patient receives: conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (lower daily doses given over the span of multiple weeks, i.e. long-course), or stereotactic body radiotherapy (higher daily doses given over the span of 10 days, i.e. short-course). In a new study, Dr. Amar Kishan of Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and, lead author and vice chair of clinical and translational research in the Department of Radiation Oncology at UCLA, teamed up with Dr. Joanne Weidhaas, senior author and Head of Translational Research in the Department of Radiation Oncology, to determine if differences in a patient’s DNA would predict whether they would have genitourinary toxicity after receiving either type of radiation. “One of the biggest goals of our research program is to try to minimize toxicity and improve quality of life after treatment,” Kishan said. “The DNA “differences” we study are perfectly suited to help identify people who will respond differently to cancer therapies, like radiation. These different responses can result in toxicity,” Weidhaas said. 

To conduct the study, published in Radiotherapy and Oncology, Kishan and colleagues analyzed DNA collected from 201 men who received either conventional fractionated radiotherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy. Using unique differences in the patients’ DNA, the researchers then developed a model for both forms of radiation therapy to see if they could predict which patients would develop side effects.   

The study found that the models were highly predictive in differentiating between those who would experience toxic side effects after radiation therapy and those who would not. Furthermore, the models were able to predict toxicity depending on which type of radiation the patient received, long-course or short-course, indicating they could potentially help with decision making in choosing one treatment course over the other.   

In an ongoing clinical trial, Kishan is testing this model on a new set of patients to further confirm the study’s findings.  In the trial, the results from the DNA analysis are shared with each patient, and the impact of the information on shared decision making, as well as decreasing toxicity in the group as a whole, is being evaluated. 

“This research may ultimately guide a prostate cancer patient’s treatment plan,” said Kishan. "If we can know ahead of time who will tolerate radiation treatment and who may suffer these side effects, we can do a better job of assuring not only the best treatment but the one with least impact on quality of life."

For more information: https://www.uclahealth.org/

Related prostate cancer information:

Cancer Patients Overlooked in COVID-19 Vaccine Rollout

Black Patients 24% Less Likely than White Patients to Have a Prostate MRI After Receiving an Elevated PSA Score

Data Presented at ASTRO 2021 Validate Prognostic Value of Decipher Prostate Genomic Test in Newly Diagnosed, Clinically High-Risk Prostate Cancer

International Meta-analysis Quantifies Impact of Three Prostate Cancer Therapy Intensification Strategies


Related Content

News | Breast Imaging

February 22, 2024 — The FAST-Forward randomized trial from the UK found that ultrahypofractionated whole breast ...

Time February 22, 2024
arrow
News | Radiation Oncology

February 22, 2024 — The National Institutes of Health has launched a clinical trials network to evaluate emerging ...

Time February 22, 2024
arrow
News | Radiopharmaceuticals and Tracers

February 21, 2024 — Blue Earth Therapeutics, a Bracco company and emerging leader in the development of innovative next ...

Time February 21, 2024
arrow
News | Radiation Oncology

February 14, 2024 — Accuray Incorporated announced that the team at Quebec’s Montérégie Integrated Cancer Center, part ...

Time February 14, 2024
arrow
News | Radiation Oncology

February 12, 2024 — Radformation, a global pioneer in radiation oncology software solutions, is pleased to announce its ...

Time February 12, 2024
arrow
News | Quality Assurance (QA)

February 12, 2024 — IBA, a world leader in particle accelerator technology and a world-leading provider of dosimetry and ...

Time February 12, 2024
arrow
News | Radiation Therapy

February 8, 2024 — RaySearch Laboratories AB announced that The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, a specialist cancer ...

Time February 08, 2024
arrow
Videos | RSNA

At RSNA23, Imaging Technology News (ITN) spoke with Bhvita Jani, principal analyst at Signify Research, about ...

Time February 07, 2024
arrow
News | Interventional Radiology

February 6, 2024 — RenovoRx, Inc., a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company developing novel precision oncology ...

Time February 06, 2024
arrow
News | Treatment Planning

February 2, 2024 — RaySearch Laboratories announced that the number of radiotherapy centers that have chosen RayStation ...

Time February 02, 2024
arrow
Subscribe Now