News | Artificial Intelligence | April 02, 2019 | Jeff Zagoudis, Associate Editor

FDA Proposes New Review Framework for AI-based Medical Devices

Discussion paper describes need to regulate artificial intelligence that continuously learns

FDA Proposes New Review Framework for AI-based Medical Devices

April 2, 2019 — U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, M.D., announced Tuesday the agency is pursuing a new framework in which to review artificial intelligence (AI)-based medical software and devices to ensure ongoing effectiveness and patient safety. The agency released a 20-page discussion paper explaining the need for a new framework, the tenets of a total product lifecycle (TPLC) approach to certification, and examples of potential real-world AI software modifications that may or may not be permitted under the proposed framework. The FDA is asking for comments and feedback from all parties to inform future decisions.

Locked Versus Adaptive AI

To date, only two AI-based technologies have received full FDA approval and are in clinical use — IDx-DR, a software that detects diabetic retinopathy, and the Viz.AI Contact application that analyzes computed tomography (CT) images for potential signs of stroke. Gottlieb noted that both of these technologies can be considered “locked” algorithms. This means that the base algorithms can only be modified by the manufacturer, and must be manually verified and validated by them as well. Other AI algorithms are considered “adaptive” or “continuously learning,” and these learn from new user data acquired through real-world use.

In the statement, Gottlieb acknowledged the vast potential of such adaptive algorithms, but also insisted that these more open technologies must still adhere to the FDA’s safety and effectiveness standards.

Total Product Lifecycle Regulatory Approach

The discussion paper describes how the current 510(k) approval pathway takes a risk-based approach, requiring new premarket submissions for some software modifications. Categories of software modifications that may require a premarket submission include:

  • A change that introduces a new risk or modifies an existing risk that could result in significant harm;
  • A change to risk controls to prevent significant harm; and
  • A change that significantly affects clinical functionality or performance specifications of the device.

For today’s AI-based technologies, the discussion paper notes these considerations must be balanced with the ability for the software to “continue to learn and evolve over time to improve patient care.”

To satisfy all of these requirements, the discussion paper explores the potential of a total product lifecycle (TPLC)-based approach to certification. In this model, the FDA would “assess the culture of quality and organizational excellence of a particular company, and have reasonable assurance of the high quality of their software development, testing and performance monitoring of their products.”

One of the key elements considered in the TPLC approach will be a software’s predetermined change control plan. This plan would provide detailed information about the types of anticipated modifications based on the algorithm’s re-training and update strategy, and the associated methodology being used to implement those changes in a controlled manner that manages risks to patients. According to Gottlieb, the goal of a revised framework would to assure that ongoing algorithm changes:

  • Follow pre-specified performance objectives and change control plans;
  • Use a validation process that ensures improvements to the performance, safety and effectiveness of the AI software; and
  • Include real-world monitoring of performance once the device is on the market to ensure safety and effectiveness are maintained.

The agency is taking public comment on the contents of the discussion paper through June 3, 2019. The full discussion paper can be read here. Comments can be submitted here.

For more information: www.fda.gov

Related Content

Graphic courtesy of Pixabay

Graphic courtesy of Pixabay

Feature | Artificial Intelligence | April 22, 2019 | By Greg Freiherr
...
HHS Extends Comment Period for Proposed Electronic Health Information Interoperability Rules
News | Electronic Medical Records (EMR) | April 19, 2019
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is extending the public comment period by 30 days for two...
FDA Clears GE's Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Engine
Technology | Computed Tomography (CT) | April 19, 2019
GE Healthcare has received 510(k) clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of its Deep Learning Image...
In a demonstration on the exhibit floor of the SBI symposium, Koios software identified suspicious lesions in ultrasound images

In a demonstration on the exhibit floor of the SBI symposium, Koios software identified suspicious lesions in ultrasound images. Photo by Greg Freiherr

Feature | Artificial Intelligence | April 19, 2019 | By Greg Freiherr
Commercial efforts to develop...
Artificial Intelligence Performs As Well As Experienced Radiologists in Detecting Prostate Cancer
News | Artificial Intelligence | April 18, 2019
University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) researchers have developed a new artificial intelligence (AI) system to...
Atrium Health Debuts Amazon Alexa Skill to Help Patients Access Medical Care
News | Artificial Intelligence | April 18, 2019
Atrium Health patients will now be able to use Amazon’s electronic voice system Alexa to not only locate the nearest...
Oxipit Introduces Multilingual Support for ChestEye AI Imaging Suite
News | Artificial Intelligence | April 16, 2019
The CE-certified ChestEye artificial intelligence (AI) imaging suite by Oxipit is now available in seven European...
iCAD Appoints Stacey Stevens as President
News | Radiology Business | April 16, 2019
iCAD Inc. recently announced that Stacey Stevens has been named president. As president, Stevens will have expanded...