News | Radiology Business | December 28, 2021

American Society of Anesthesiologists, American College of Emergency Physicians, and American College of Radiology File Lawsuit Against the Federal Government’s Implementation Rules for ‘No Surprises Act’

The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA),the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) and the American College of Radiology (ACR) today brought a lawsuit against the federal government charging that the interim final rule (IFR) on surprise medical billing goes against the language of the “No Surprises Act” and will ultimately harm patients and access to care.

December 28, 2021 — The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA),the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) and the American College of Radiology (ACR) today brought a lawsuit against the federal government charging that the interim final rule (IFR) on surprise medical billing goes against the language of the “No Surprises Act” and will ultimately harm patients and access to care.

The No Surprises Act, which was passed in December 2020, was designed to protect patients from surprise out-of-network bills. Although the law intended to resolve payment disputes through an impartial arbitration system, the interim final rule released by the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor, and Treasury create a system that empowers profit-seeking insurance companies to strong-arm local community physician practices, narrow their provider networks and reduce access to care.

The recent rule ignores the law’s intent to create a fair independent dispute resolution (IDR) process, according to ASA, ACEP and ACR. In the law that was passed, the arbiter is directed to consider all information submitted by the physician and insurer, including the median in-network rate, complexity of the case, previously contracted rates and market power of the physician and insurance company, among other things.

The law states that the qualified payment amount (QPA) could be one of many equally weighted factors considered in payment disputes. However, the departments made the QPA — an unverified rate set by insurers — the primary factor in the IDR process. This sets an artificially low benchmark payment, for all care – whether in network or not, which may not support wider access to care – particularly in underserved areas.

“We strongly support the patient protections in this law. However, instead of expanding in-network access for patients, this rule does is exactly what we explained to Congress and the rule-making agencies would happen: insurance companies will use their overwhelming market power and these flawed rules to push more physicians out of network and fatten their bottom line,” said ASA President Randall M. Clark, M.D., FASA. “If these rules are not overturned or corrected, insurance companies will use strong-arm tactics to abuse these laws as we have already seen in North Carolina, ultimately compromising timely access to care, potentially causing severe disruption and the wholesale loss of care for patients in areas that really need it.”

“It is deeply troubling that the administration would upend the deliberately balanced mechanism to resolve billing disputes established by Congress as part of the No Surprises Act. We are left with a law that will tilt market forces in favor of insurers and they are already exploiting their newfound incentive to push emergency physicians out of network. Legal remedy is necessary so that the IFR does not undermine the entire dispute resolution process,” said Gillian Schmitz, M.D., FACEP, president of ACEP.

“Many practices are reeling from the pandemic’s economic impact. Imaging costs are down in recent years – including 2020. Now, insurers are using the new law to increase their profits by artificially cutting reimbursement to a point that many providers can’t absorb and become unable to remain in their network,” said Howard B. Fleishon, M.D., MMM, FACR, chair of the American College of Radiology Board of Chancellors. “Rural areas and underserved communities may be hit hardest by this insurer overreach that could result in longer wait times for care, delayed diagnosis, higher out of pocket costs to treat more advanced conditions, and even deaths as insurers use the new law to deny patients covered access to their chosen providers. With this harmful regulation due to take effect January 1, we have little choice but to protect patient access to care by taking legal action.” 

This lawsuit does not impact No Surprises Act protections to hold patients harmless during insurer-provider out-of-network payment disputes and will not increase patient out-of-pocket costs. The lawsuit was filed today in federal district court in Chicago.

For more information: www.acep.org


Related Content

News | Radiology Business

March 27, 2023 — Swissray brand has a long history of pioneering digital x-ray technology. One of the first markets that ...

Time March 27, 2023
arrow
News | Artificial Intelligence

March 27, 2023 — DeepTek.ai, a leading radiology AI company offering multiple AI-powered solutions for radiology ...

Time March 27, 2023
arrow
News | ARRS

March 23, 2023 — According to an accepted manuscript published in ARRS’ own American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR) ...

Time March 24, 2023
arrow
Feature | AIMed | By Melinda Taschetta-Millane

The 2023 AiMed Global Summit will focus on artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare, and will offer valuable insights ...

Time March 23, 2023
arrow
News | Nuclear Imaging

March 22, 2023 — A novel imaging modality that can visualize the distribution of medical radiopharmaceuticals with very ...

Time March 22, 2023
arrow
News | Lung Imaging

March 22, 2023 — The Riverain Technologies ClearRead Bone Suppression solution is now available on the Siemens ...

Time March 22, 2023
arrow
News | Digital Pathology

March 21, 2023 — Pramana, Inc., an AI-enabled health tech company modernizing the pathology sector, and PathPresenter ...

Time March 21, 2023
arrow
News | Radiology Business

March 21, 2023 — Boston Imaging, a subsidiary of Samsung Electronics, Co. Ltd, appoints Eric Sumner as the new Digital ...

Time March 21, 2023
arrow
News | Digital Radiography (DR)

March 20, 2023 — A study by Emory Healthcare reports that Konica Minolta Healthcare’s Dynamic Digital Radiography (DDR) ...

Time March 20, 2023
arrow
News | X-Ray

March 20, 2023 — Researchers from UNSW Sydney have developed an algorithm which produces high-resolution modeled images ...

Time March 20, 2023
arrow
Subscribe Now