Feature | Breast Imaging | December 29, 2015

Study also finds there was a greater proportion of invasive and node-negative cancers in those who had ultrasound

Breast ultrasound, ABUS

December 29, 2015 - The use of ultrasound (US) in detecting breast cancer has been shown to be comparable in its sensitivity to that of mammography and should be considered when testing for the disease according to a study published Dec. 28 in the JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

The number of breast cancers is increasing across the globe, with over 1.6 million new cases of the disease in 2010, resulting in the deaths of over 425,000 women.  Additionally, 2.1 million new breast cancer cases are expected by 2030.  While mammography is an effective method in detecting breast cancer in developed countries, it is not commonly available in less developed nations, and alternative methods, such as ultrasound, need to be tested.

To determine the effectiveness of using ultrasound to detect breast cancer, Wendie A. Berg, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Radiology, Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pa., and colleagues recruited 2,809 women across 20 different sites in the United States, Canada, and Argentina to the American College of Radiology Imaging Network protocol 6666 breast cancer screening study.  Of the participants, 2,662 completed three annual breast screenings by US and film-screen or digital mammography, and then had a biopsy or a 12-month follow-up.

The researchers found that the number of US screens to detect breast cancer was comparable to that of mammography, and found that there was a greater proportion of invasive and node-negative cancers in those who had US; however, there was also a greater number of false-positives among the women screened with US. While the false-positive rate of US exceeds that of mammography, the number of women recalled for extra testing becomes more comparable on incidence screening rounds, the authors write.  

“Where mammography is available, US should be seen as a supplemental test for women with dense breasts who do not meet high-risk criteria for screening MRI and for high-risk women with dense breasts who are unable to tolerate MRI,” Berg said.

For more information: www.oxfordjournals.org/our_journals/jnci/press_releases/bergdjv367.pdf


Related Content

News | Ultrasound Imaging

May 26, 2026 — A soft, wearable ultrasound patch that can continuously monitor a fetus for hours at a time — and it can ...

Time May 27, 2026
arrow
News

May 21, 2026 – Artera, the developer of multimodal artificial intelligence (MMAI)-based prognostic and predictive cancer ...

Time May 22, 2026
arrow
News | Ultrasound Imaging

May 20, 2026 — The Focused Ultrasound Foundation has announced the launch of the International Focused Ultrasound ...

Time May 21, 2026
arrow
News | Focused Ultrasound Therapy

May 7, 2026 — Openwater, an open-source medical technology company has announced a collaboration with the Sharma Lab, a ...

Time May 07, 2026
arrow
News | FDA

May 6, 2026 — Artera, the developer of multimodal artificial intelligence (MMAI)-based prognostic and predictive cancer ...

Time May 07, 2026
arrow
News | X-Ray

April 29, 2026 — Results from a new study* presented at the American Roentgen Ray Society’s (ARRS) 2026 annual meeting ...

Time April 29, 2026
arrow
News | Contrast Agents

April 23, 2026 — On April 23, GE HealthCare announced the first patient has been dosed in the international, multi ...

Time April 23, 2026
arrow
News | Women's Health

April 16, 2026 – GE HealthCare has expanded its collaboration with DeepHealth, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of RadNet ...

Time April 20, 2026
arrow
News | Breast Imaging

April 15, 2026 — QT Imaging Holdings, Inc. has launched its QTI Imaging-Olea Viewer, developed in collaboration with ...

Time April 15, 2026
arrow
News | Radiology Imaging

April 7, 2026 — Onvida Health and Siemens Healthineers have entered a 10-year Value Partnership¹ designed to bring the ...

Time April 09, 2026
arrow
Subscribe Now