Feature | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) | September 07, 2016

Study finds MRIs in first trimester of pregnancy were not associated with increased risk

Fetal MRI image on Philips Ingenia 1.5T

This study found MRI is safe by itself, but the use of gadolinium contrast may be a factor involved with an array of issues that impact the fetus and young children after birth.  


September 7, 2016 — In an analysis that included more than 1.4 million births, exposure to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during the first trimester of pregnancy compared with nonexposure was not associated with increased risk of harm to the fetus or in early childhood. However, data suggests gadolinium contrast enhanced MRI scans at any time during pregnancy may be associated with an increased risk of a broad set of rheumatological, inflammatory or skin conditions and, possibly, for stillbirth or neonatal death, according to a study appearing in the Sept. 6, 2016, issue of Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).[1]

Concern has been expressed about the safety of MRI exposure in the first trimester of pregnancy due to the heating of sensitive tissues by radiofrequency fields and exposure to the loud acoustic environment. When indicated, MRI's diagnostic accuracy is improved with gadolinium, an intravenous contrast agent. Fetal safety of MRI during the first trimester of pregnancy or with gadolinium enhancement at any time of pregnancy is unknown. While MRI is generally thought to be safe for the fetus in the second or third trimesters of pregnancy, there were no prior controlled studies on its safety in the first trimester, when the fetus forms its major organs and body structures.

 

Watch the VIDEO "MRI Gadolinium Contrast Retention in the Brain."

 

To inform clinical guidelines for MRIs on pregnant women, Joel G. Ray, M.D., M.Sc., FRCPC, of St. Michael's Hospital and the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, and colleagues used health data housed at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences to examine records of more than 1.4 million births in Ontario from 2003-2015. They compared women who had first-trimester MRIs with those who had not, and also followed their children up to age 4. 

In pregnancies that lasted a minimum of 21 gestational weeks, 1 in 250 had an MRI in pregnancy, including 1 in 1,200 in the first trimester and 1 in 3,000 with gadolinium contrast. Maternal MRI in the first trimester was not associated with a higher risk of stillbirth or neonatal death, congenital anomalies, neoplasm or hearing loss.

"Having an MRI at the earliest stages of pregnancy does not seem to alter the development of the fetus," Ray said.

However, exposure to gadolinium-enhanced MRI at any gestation was not associated with a greater risk of congenital anomalies. Although a nephrogenic systemic fibrosis-like outcome was extremely rare, gadolinium-enhanced MRI was associated with an increased risk for a non-specific outcome of any rheumatological, inflammatory or infiltrative skin condition up to age 4 years, and for stillbirth or neonatal death, although there were just seven events in the gadolinium MRI group.

"The current findings inform published recommendations about the safety of MRI in the first trimester of pregnancy," the authors wrote. "Until further studies are done, these findings suggest that gadolinium contrast should be avoided during pregnancy."

Read the article “Gadolinium May Remain in Brain after Contrast MRI.” 

Even though the actual number of stillbirths was low (one in 50), and the outcome of a skin or rheumatological condition was very broadly defined, Ray said the results support clinical guidelines to avoid giving pregnant women gadolinium unless strongly indicated.

The current study did not include specific information as to why the women received an MRI, or whether they knew they were pregnant at the time. But the study did track the specialty of the physician ordering the MRI: 44 percent were family physicians, suggesting the MRI may have been booked prior to a woman having conceived. The other common specialty was a neurologist or neurosurgeon, suggesting that some women were investigated for headaches or spinal disc issues.

For more information http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jama.2016.12126

 

Related Gadolinium Safety Concern Articles

Gadolinium May Remain in Brain after Contrast MRI

ACR Manual on Contrast Media Addresses FDA Gadolinium Safety Concerns

Study Finds No Association Between Gadolinium Contrast and Nervous System Disorder

Even High Doses of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents Doesn't Cause NSF

Reference: 

1. Joel G. Ray, Marian J. Vermeulen, Aditya Bharatha, et al. “Association Between MRI Exposure During Pregnancy and Fetal and Childhood Outcomes.” JAMA. 2016;316(9):952-961. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.12126.


Related Content

News | Clinical Trials

February 8, 2023 — Cleveland Clinic researchers have launched the next step in their novel study of a vaccine aimed at ...

Time February 08, 2023
arrow
News | Ultrasound Women's Health

February 8, 2023 — Boston Imaging, the United States headquarters of Samsung’s digital radiography and ultrasound ...

Time February 08, 2023
arrow
News | Breast Density

February 6, 2023 — Awareness of breast density appears to increase one’s perceived breast cancer risk for a short time ...

Time February 06, 2023
arrow
News | Radiology Business

February 2, 2023 — Five additional imaging centers across Allegheny Health Network (AHN) have been recognized by the ...

Time February 02, 2023
arrow
News | Radiation Oncology

February 2, 2023 — The V Foundation, a top cancer research charity, has announced the establishment of a new grant ...

Time February 02, 2023
arrow
News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

February 1, 2023 — According to an accepted manuscript published in ARRS’ American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR), MRI ...

Time February 01, 2023
arrow
News | MRI Breast

February 1, 2023 — Compared to other common supplemental screening methods, breast MRI was superior at detecting breast ...

Time February 01, 2023
arrow
News | Stereotactic Breast Imaging

January 27, 2023 — According to an accepted manuscript published in ARRS’ American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR), both ...

Time January 27, 2023
arrow
News | Artificial Intelligence

January 26, 2023 — MedCognetics, Inc., an Artificial Intelligence (AI) software firm, announced that it has been awarded ...

Time January 26, 2023
arrow
News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

January 25, 2023 — On November 11th, 2022 at the Southern Hills Hospital in Las Vegas, USA, Robotic Spine Surgeon Dr ...

Time January 25, 2023
arrow
Subscribe Now