News | Artificial Intelligence | March 08, 2023

An artificial intelligence (AI) tool can accurately identify normal and abnormal chest X-rays in a clinical setting, according to a study published in Radiology, a journal of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) 

Images in a 44-year-old man who presented with chest pain and dyspnea. (A) Chest X-ray shows very subtle nodular opacities, primarily in lower lobes, representative of pneumonia and a discrete silhouette sign of the right cardiac border (arrow). The AI system interpreted this chest X-ray as normal. It was also interpreted as normal in the clinical radiology report. (B) CT scan shows the lower lobe airspace opacities with vague tree-in-bud morphology (box) and an area of consolidation (arrow). Pulmonary angi

An artificial intelligence (AI) tool can accurately identify normal and abnormal chest X-rays in a clinical setting, according to a study published in Radiology, a journal of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)


March 8, 2023 — An artificial intelligence (AI) tool can accurately identify normal and abnormal chest X-rays in a clinical setting, according to a study published today, March 7, in Radiology, a journal of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA). 

Chest X-rays are used to diagnose a wide variety of conditions to do with the heart and lungs. An abnormal chest X-ray can be an indication of a range of conditions, including cancer and chronic lung diseases. 

An AI tool that can accurately differentiate between normal and abnormal chest X-rays would greatly alleviate the heavy workload experienced by radiologists globally. 

“There is an exponentially growing demand for medical imaging, especially cross-sectional such as CT and MRI,” said study co-author Louis Lind Plesner, M.D., from the Department of Radiology at the Herlev and Gentofte Hospital in Copenhagen, Denmark. “Meanwhile, there is a global shortage of trained radiologists. Artificial intelligence has shown great promise but should always be thoroughly tested before any implementation.” 

For this retrospective, multi-center study, Dr. Plesner and colleagues wanted to determine the reliability of using an AI tool that can identify normal and abnormal chest X-rays. 

Researchers used a commercially available AI tool to analyze the chest X-rays of 1,529 patients from four hospitals in the capital region of Denmark. Chest X-rays were included from emergency department patients, in-hospital patients and outpatients. The X-rays were classified by the AI tool as either “high-confidence normal” or “not high-confidence normal” as in normal and abnormal, respectively. 

Two board-certified thoracic (chest) radiologists were used as the reference standard. A third radiologist was used in cases of disagreements, and all three physicians were blinded to the AI results. 

Of the 429 chest X-rays that were classified as normal, 120, or 28%, were also classified by the AI tool as normal. These X-rays, or 7.8 % of all the X-rays, could be potentially safely automated by an AI tool. The AI tool identified abnormal chest X-rays with a 99.1% of sensitivity. 

“The most surprising finding was just how sensitive this AI tool was for all kinds of chest disease,” Dr. Plesner said. “In fact, we could not find a single chest X-ray in our database where the algorithm made a major mistake. Furthermore, the AI tool had a sensitivity overall better than the clinical board-certified radiologists.” 

According to the researchers, further studies could be directed toward larger prospective implementation of the AI tool where the autonomously reported chest X-rays are still reviewed by radiologists. 

The AI tool performed especially well at identifying normal X-rays of the outpatient group at a rate of 11.6%. This suggests that the AI model would perform especially well in outpatient settings with a high prevalence of normal chest X-rays. 

“Chest X-rays are one of the most common imaging examination performed worldwide,” Dr. Plesner said. “Even a small percentage of automatization can lead to saved time for radiologists, which they can prioritize on more complex matters.” 

For more information: www.rsna.org 

Find more RSNA coverage here 


Related Content

News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

May 11, 2026 – At the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM) 2026 Annual Meeting, GE ...

Time May 11, 2026
arrow
News | FDA

May 6, 2026 — Artera, the developer of multimodal artificial intelligence (MMAI)-based prognostic and predictive cancer ...

Time May 07, 2026
arrow
News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

April 27, 2026 — SimonMed, one of the nation’s largest independent outpatient imaging providers, has announced the ...

Time May 04, 2026
arrow
News | Computed Tomography (CT)

April 23, 2026 — Royal Philips has received 510(k) clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for its ...

Time April 30, 2026
arrow
News | X-Ray

April 29, 2026 — Results from a new study* presented at the American Roentgen Ray Society’s (ARRS) 2026 annual meeting ...

Time April 29, 2026
arrow
News | Radiology Business

April 28, 2026 — The American Society of Radiologic Technologists will award Life Member status to three longstanding ...

Time April 29, 2026
arrow
News | Cardiac Imaging

April 28, 2026 — Abbott has received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clearance and CE Mark for its next ...

Time April 28, 2026
arrow
News | Radiology Business

April 24, 2026 — The 2026 vacancy rate for radiation therapists decreased to 11.4% and the vacancy rate for medical ...

Time April 24, 2026
arrow
News | Artificial Intelligence

April 20, 2026 — DeepTek, provider of the Augmento platform and deepc, the company behind deepcOS, have introduced a ...

Time April 23, 2026
arrow
News | X-Ray

April 14, 2026 — KA Imaging is seeing continued adoption of its X-ray technology across new regions, with recent ...

Time April 15, 2026
arrow
Subscribe Now