News | Artificial Intelligence | March 08, 2023

An artificial intelligence (AI) tool can accurately identify normal and abnormal chest X-rays in a clinical setting, according to a study published in Radiology, a journal of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) 

Images in a 44-year-old man who presented with chest pain and dyspnea. (A) Chest X-ray shows very subtle nodular opacities, primarily in lower lobes, representative of pneumonia and a discrete silhouette sign of the right cardiac border (arrow). The AI system interpreted this chest X-ray as normal. It was also interpreted as normal in the clinical radiology report. (B) CT scan shows the lower lobe airspace opacities with vague tree-in-bud morphology (box) and an area of consolidation (arrow). Pulmonary angi

An artificial intelligence (AI) tool can accurately identify normal and abnormal chest X-rays in a clinical setting, according to a study published in Radiology, a journal of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)


March 8, 2023 — An artificial intelligence (AI) tool can accurately identify normal and abnormal chest X-rays in a clinical setting, according to a study published today, March 7, in Radiology, a journal of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA). 

Chest X-rays are used to diagnose a wide variety of conditions to do with the heart and lungs. An abnormal chest X-ray can be an indication of a range of conditions, including cancer and chronic lung diseases. 

An AI tool that can accurately differentiate between normal and abnormal chest X-rays would greatly alleviate the heavy workload experienced by radiologists globally. 

“There is an exponentially growing demand for medical imaging, especially cross-sectional such as CT and MRI,” said study co-author Louis Lind Plesner, M.D., from the Department of Radiology at the Herlev and Gentofte Hospital in Copenhagen, Denmark. “Meanwhile, there is a global shortage of trained radiologists. Artificial intelligence has shown great promise but should always be thoroughly tested before any implementation.” 

For this retrospective, multi-center study, Dr. Plesner and colleagues wanted to determine the reliability of using an AI tool that can identify normal and abnormal chest X-rays. 

Researchers used a commercially available AI tool to analyze the chest X-rays of 1,529 patients from four hospitals in the capital region of Denmark. Chest X-rays were included from emergency department patients, in-hospital patients and outpatients. The X-rays were classified by the AI tool as either “high-confidence normal” or “not high-confidence normal” as in normal and abnormal, respectively. 

Two board-certified thoracic (chest) radiologists were used as the reference standard. A third radiologist was used in cases of disagreements, and all three physicians were blinded to the AI results. 

Of the 429 chest X-rays that were classified as normal, 120, or 28%, were also classified by the AI tool as normal. These X-rays, or 7.8 % of all the X-rays, could be potentially safely automated by an AI tool. The AI tool identified abnormal chest X-rays with a 99.1% of sensitivity. 

“The most surprising finding was just how sensitive this AI tool was for all kinds of chest disease,” Dr. Plesner said. “In fact, we could not find a single chest X-ray in our database where the algorithm made a major mistake. Furthermore, the AI tool had a sensitivity overall better than the clinical board-certified radiologists.” 

According to the researchers, further studies could be directed toward larger prospective implementation of the AI tool where the autonomously reported chest X-rays are still reviewed by radiologists. 

The AI tool performed especially well at identifying normal X-rays of the outpatient group at a rate of 11.6%. This suggests that the AI model would perform especially well in outpatient settings with a high prevalence of normal chest X-rays. 

“Chest X-rays are one of the most common imaging examination performed worldwide,” Dr. Plesner said. “Even a small percentage of automatization can lead to saved time for radiologists, which they can prioritize on more complex matters.” 

For more information: www.rsna.org 

Find more RSNA coverage here 


Related Content

News | Computed Tomography (CT)

Jan. 21, 2026 — Aidoc recently announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cleared the industry's first ...

Time January 23, 2026
arrow
News | Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS)

Jan. 22, 2026 — Qure.ai has received a grant from the Gates Foundation to develop a large open-source multi-modal ...

Time January 23, 2026
arrow
News | Radiology Imaging

Jan. 21, 2026 — Cathpax, a spin-off of the Lemer Pax group that designs, develops and commercializes team-wide, full ...

Time January 22, 2026
arrow
News | PACS

Jan. 21, 2026 — Fujifilm Healthcare Americas Corp. and Voicebrook, Inc. have announced a strategic partnership to ...

Time January 22, 2026
arrow
News | RSNA

Jan. 22, 2026 — The nomination deadline for the 2026 RSNA Rising Star Award is approaching. The Rising Star Award is ...

Time January 22, 2026
arrow
News | Radiology Education

Jan. 20, 2026 — The American Society of Radiologic Technicians (ASRT) Foundation has named ASRT member Danielle McDonagh ...

Time January 20, 2026
arrow
News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Jan. 20, 2026 — Hyperfine, the developer of the first FDA-cleared AI-powered portable MRI system for the brain — the ...

Time January 20, 2026
arrow
News | Mammography

Jan. 16, 2026 — Vega Imaging Informatics has announced the successful curation of the world’s largest digital breast ...

Time January 19, 2026
arrow
News | Radiation Therapy

Jan. 16, 2026 — Elekta has announced that its Elekta Evo* CT-Linac has received 510(k) clearance from the U.S. Food and ...

Time January 16, 2026
arrow
News | Radiology Business

Jan. 7, 2026 — RadNet, Inc., a provider of high-quality, cost-effective outpatient diagnostic imaging services and ...

Time January 13, 2026
arrow
Subscribe Now