News | Artificial Intelligence | March 08, 2023

An artificial intelligence (AI) tool can accurately identify normal and abnormal chest X-rays in a clinical setting, according to a study published in Radiology, a journal of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) 

Images in a 44-year-old man who presented with chest pain and dyspnea. (A) Chest X-ray shows very subtle nodular opacities, primarily in lower lobes, representative of pneumonia and a discrete silhouette sign of the right cardiac border (arrow). The AI system interpreted this chest X-ray as normal. It was also interpreted as normal in the clinical radiology report. (B) CT scan shows the lower lobe airspace opacities with vague tree-in-bud morphology (box) and an area of consolidation (arrow). Pulmonary angi

An artificial intelligence (AI) tool can accurately identify normal and abnormal chest X-rays in a clinical setting, according to a study published in Radiology, a journal of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)


March 8, 2023 — An artificial intelligence (AI) tool can accurately identify normal and abnormal chest X-rays in a clinical setting, according to a study published today, March 7, in Radiology, a journal of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA). 

Chest X-rays are used to diagnose a wide variety of conditions to do with the heart and lungs. An abnormal chest X-ray can be an indication of a range of conditions, including cancer and chronic lung diseases. 

An AI tool that can accurately differentiate between normal and abnormal chest X-rays would greatly alleviate the heavy workload experienced by radiologists globally. 

“There is an exponentially growing demand for medical imaging, especially cross-sectional such as CT and MRI,” said study co-author Louis Lind Plesner, M.D., from the Department of Radiology at the Herlev and Gentofte Hospital in Copenhagen, Denmark. “Meanwhile, there is a global shortage of trained radiologists. Artificial intelligence has shown great promise but should always be thoroughly tested before any implementation.” 

For this retrospective, multi-center study, Dr. Plesner and colleagues wanted to determine the reliability of using an AI tool that can identify normal and abnormal chest X-rays. 

Researchers used a commercially available AI tool to analyze the chest X-rays of 1,529 patients from four hospitals in the capital region of Denmark. Chest X-rays were included from emergency department patients, in-hospital patients and outpatients. The X-rays were classified by the AI tool as either “high-confidence normal” or “not high-confidence normal” as in normal and abnormal, respectively. 

Two board-certified thoracic (chest) radiologists were used as the reference standard. A third radiologist was used in cases of disagreements, and all three physicians were blinded to the AI results. 

Of the 429 chest X-rays that were classified as normal, 120, or 28%, were also classified by the AI tool as normal. These X-rays, or 7.8 % of all the X-rays, could be potentially safely automated by an AI tool. The AI tool identified abnormal chest X-rays with a 99.1% of sensitivity. 

“The most surprising finding was just how sensitive this AI tool was for all kinds of chest disease,” Dr. Plesner said. “In fact, we could not find a single chest X-ray in our database where the algorithm made a major mistake. Furthermore, the AI tool had a sensitivity overall better than the clinical board-certified radiologists.” 

According to the researchers, further studies could be directed toward larger prospective implementation of the AI tool where the autonomously reported chest X-rays are still reviewed by radiologists. 

The AI tool performed especially well at identifying normal X-rays of the outpatient group at a rate of 11.6%. This suggests that the AI model would perform especially well in outpatient settings with a high prevalence of normal chest X-rays. 

“Chest X-rays are one of the most common imaging examination performed worldwide,” Dr. Plesner said. “Even a small percentage of automatization can lead to saved time for radiologists, which they can prioritize on more complex matters.” 

For more information: www.rsna.org 

Find more RSNA coverage here 


Related Content

News | Artificial Intelligence

March 22, 2023 — Nuance Communications, Inc., a Microsoft company, has announced DAX Express, its next milestone in its ...

Time March 22, 2023
arrow
News | Digital Pathology

March 21, 2023 — Pramana, Inc., an AI-enabled health tech company modernizing the pathology sector, and PathPresenter ...

Time March 21, 2023
arrow
News | Radiology Business

March 21, 2023 — Boston Imaging, a subsidiary of Samsung Electronics, Co. Ltd, appoints Eric Sumner as the new Digital ...

Time March 21, 2023
arrow
News | Digital Radiography (DR)

March 20, 2023 — A study by Emory Healthcare reports that Konica Minolta Healthcare’s Dynamic Digital Radiography (DDR) ...

Time March 20, 2023
arrow
News | X-Ray

March 20, 2023 — Researchers from UNSW Sydney have developed an algorithm which produces high-resolution modeled images ...

Time March 20, 2023
arrow
News | Artificial Intelligence

March 17, 2023 — A new paper published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research describes how generative models such ...

Time March 17, 2023
arrow
News | Radiopharmaceuticals and Tracers

March 16, 2023 — A supply problem with Pluvicto [177Lu-vipivotide tetraxetan; Novartis], the radiopharmaceutical used to ...

Time March 16, 2023
arrow
Feature | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) | By Brad Sutton

March 16, 2023, marks 50 years since Paul Lauterbur published his seminal Nature paper establishing zeugmatography — now ...

Time March 16, 2023
arrow
News | Radiology Imaging

March 15, 2023 — Regions of the U.S. with an extreme level of socioeconomic disadvantage were less likely to have access ...

Time March 15, 2023
arrow
News | Breast Imaging

March 15, 2023 — In a study of over a million women, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) showed improved breast cancer ...

Time March 15, 2023
arrow
Subscribe Now