76-Year-Old Patient, Not on Antithrombotic Therapy, Presenting to ED After Ground-Level Fall (Glasgow Coma Scale of 15)

March 25, 2022 — According to ARRS’ American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR), antithrombotic therapy was not linked to increased incidence of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage on CT in adult patients, although the therapy did show association with hematoma expansion at follow-up.

“The findings suggest, in patients with good neurological status after ground-level fall, application of a similar strategy for selecting patients for initial head CT, regardless of antithrombotic therapy use,” wrote first author Zeynep Vardar, M.D., at the University of Massachusetts Medical Center in Worcester. “If initial head CT shows traumatic intracranial hemorrhage, early follow-up head CT should be systematically performed in those on antithrombotic therapy though possibly deferred in other patients.”

Vardar and colleagues’ retrospective case-control study included 1,630 patients (693 female, 937 male; mean age, 80 years) who underwent head CT after presenting to the emergency department (ED) with ground-level fall (Glasgow Coma Scale ≥ 14 and no focal neurological deficit) between January 1 and December 31, 2020. Initial head CT examinations were reviewed for traumatic intracranial hemorrhage characteristics and follow-up head CT examinations (performed within 24 hours) were reviewed for hematoma expansion, with clinical outcomes extracted from medical records.

The frequency of intracranial hemorrhage after ground-level fall with good neurological status was not significantly different between patients on antithrombotic therapy and those not on antithrombotic therapy (4.4% vs 3.1% respectively, p = .24). However, hematoma expansion occurred more frequently in patients on antithrombotic therapy (26.2% vs 4.8%, p = .04).

Also noting no significant difference between patients on anticoagulant therapy alone, antiplatelet therapy alone, or both, “the frequency of midline shift and regional mass effect was not significantly different between patients on antithrombotic therapy and control patients,” the authors of this AJR article added.

For more information: www.arrs.org


Related Content

Feature | Radiology Business | By Melinda Taschetta-Millane

One on One interviews with radiology trailblazers and historic FDA clearances made the top-read list for April. Take a ...

Time May 03, 2024
arrow
Feature | Radiation Dose Management | By Christine Book

Advances in the growing radiation dose management market are continually helping those who administer treatment to focus ...

Time May 03, 2024
arrow
News | Pediatric Imaging

May 2, 2024 — Head and abdominal trauma is a leading cause of death for children. About 1%–2% of children who come to ...

Time May 02, 2024
arrow
Feature | Radiology Business

Beginning this spring, ITN will begin sending out a bi-monthly survey to our readers on a variety of topics, which we ...

Time May 02, 2024
arrow
News | Breast Imaging

May 1, 2024 — After the issuance of updated breast screening recommendations by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force ...

Time May 01, 2024
arrow
News | Ultrasound Imaging

April 30, 2024 — Best Nomos, a TeamBest Global Company, is launching its most modern, highly innovative Compact SONALIS ...

Time April 30, 2024
arrow
News | Enterprise Imaging

April 25, 2024 — International medical imaging IT and cybersecurity company Sectra has signed two contracts to provide ...

Time April 25, 2024
arrow
News | PET Imaging

April 24, 2024 — A new study from Brigham and Women’s Hospital, a founding member of the Mass General Brigham healthcare ...

Time April 24, 2024
arrow
News | Radiology Business

April 23, 2024 — A diverse writing group, led by authors at the University of Toronto, have developed an approach for ...

Time April 23, 2024
arrow
News | FDA

April 23, 2024 — Royal Philips , a global leader in health technology, today announced its Philips Zenition 30 mobile C ...

Time April 23, 2024
arrow
Subscribe Now