News | Prostate Cancer | July 01, 2020

Researchers reviewed results of prostate biopsies on over 3,400 men who had targets identified on prostate MRI and found that the positive predictive value of the test for prostate cancer was highly variable at different sites

Researchers reviewed results of prostate biopsies on over 3,400 men who had targets identified on prostate MRI and found that the positive predictive value of the test for prostate cancer was highly variable at different sites

July 1, 2020 — Prostate MRI is an emerging technology used to identify and guide treatment for prostate cancer and has recently gained wide acceptance at many institutions. However, there has been concern that different institutions perform imaging of different quality. A recent multi-site study published in Radiology was designed to gauge the difference in imaging quality for prostate MRI by looking retrospectively at performance across 26 institutions.

Researchers reviewed the results of prostate biopsies on over 3,400 men who had targets identified on prostate MRI. They found that the positive predictive value of the test for prostate cancer was highly variable at different sites.

"The quality of prostate MRI was, indeed, heterogeneous across a number of institutions," said Ben Spilseth, M.D., associate professor in the Department of Radiology at the University of Minnesota Medical School and U of M site coordinator for the study. "There are a lot of possible reasons why this is the case. It is not just the MRI itself, but it has to do with how the image is interpreted and then how it's biopsied and sampled."

The detection of prostate cancer with prostate MRI and biopsy is an important tool and improves patient outcomes, but the experience isn't the same across all centers. Spilseth believes there is more work to be done to better understand how all institutions can have a similar outcome. He hopes that this research will bring more training and standardization across the country for prostate MRI and biopsy guidelines.

"It is important that each center has a robust quality improvement process in order to get the outcomes that we all want to see," Spilseth said.

For more information: www.med.umn.edu/ 

 

Related Prostate Cancer Content:

New Double-contrast Technique Picks Up Small Tumors on MRI

Managing Prostate Cancer Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Targeted Screening Could Prevent One in Six Prostate Cancer Deaths


Additional Content

News | Radiology Imaging

Nov. 2, 2026 — Neurophet and RapidAI have partnered to integrate Neurophet’s advanced neurodegenerative brain imaging ...

Time November 04, 2026
arrow
News | Lung Imaging

Nov.2, 2026 – SimonMed has announced the clinical launch of two advanced lung imaging technologies, CT:VQ and LDAf, in ...

Time November 02, 2026
arrow
News | Contrast Media

Oct. 27, 2026 – Bracco has announced plans to invest $230 million to establish its first U.S. manufacturing facility for ...

Time October 28, 2026
arrow
News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Oct. 26, 2026 — Dr. Kathryn Keenan is one of seven public servants from various federal agencies who will be honored at ...

Time October 27, 2026
arrow
News | Radiology Business

Oct. 26, 2026 — RadNet, Inc. has entered into a definitive agreement to acquire ONRAD, Inc., a provider of teleradiology ...

Time October 27, 2026
arrow
Subscribe Now