March 15, 2012 - Two new studies demonstrate the cosmetic and dosimetric advantages of the SAVI breast brachytherapy applicator for treatment of early-stage breast cancer.

The studies were presented as scientific posters at national medical conferences and were drawn from 12 centers participating in the SAVI Collaborative Research Group. Researchers reached two primary conclusions:

1) SAVI radiation therapy provides for excellent or good cosmetic outcomes in the majority of patients.

2) The device can safely and effectively treat the broadest range of women with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), due to the precision with which the SAVI applicator can deliver the dose.

“These studies point to the fact that by minimizing radiation exposure to normal body structures, the SAVI device makes breast-conservation therapy available to many more women, especially for those with breast cancer close to the skin or chest wall,” said Constantine Mantz, M.D. Mantz, a co-author on both studies, is a radiation oncologist and chief medical officer of 21st Century Oncology, the largest radiation oncology provider in the United States.

The SAVI Collaborative Research Group, from which the data was drawn, was established to study clinical outcomes of APBI treatment with the SAVI device. The data represents the largest subset of patients who have been treated with the SAVI applicator.

SAVI delivers a shortened course of radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer patients following lumpectomy surgery. It is the only single-entry breast brachytherapy device that allows physicians to sculpt radiation based on patient-specific anatomy, which increases the number of women who can benefit from APBI. Clinical studies show that by providing targeted radiation where it is needed most, SAVI decreases toxicity and lowers the risk of cosmetic side effects.

In a scientific poster presented at the annual meeting of the National Interdisciplinary Breast Center Conference, researchers examined cosmetic outcomes with the device among a group of 1,010 patients. Median age of women in the study group was 63 years.

Researchers found highly favorable outcomes with regard to cosmetic results. They concluded that among patients with two-year followup, 91.6 percent had excellent or good cosmetic results – even when radiation was delivered near the surface of the skin, within 7 mm or less of the surface.

“We looked at cosmetic outcomes in part because it is important to our patients,” said Robert L. Hong, M.D., the presenter and medical director of radiation oncology at Virginia Hospital Center. “This data points toward an additional quality of life benefit from the therapy.”

The second poster was presented at the annual meeting of the American College of Radiation Oncology (ACRO). It examined elements of radiation dosimetry with the SAVI device. Data involving 817 patients drawn from 12 clinical sites demonstrated the device's dosimetric versatility and its ability to precisely deliver radiation.

“Compared to other APBI devices, the SAVI applicator is better able to sculpt and control the radiation dosage, to deliver therapy to the targeted area and to protect healthy structures such as the chest wall and skin,” said ?erban Morcovescu, M.S., the poster presenter and a board-certified medical physicist at Texas Oncology Denton, in Denton, Texas.

Even with minimal skin separation of 7mm or less, the study data showed that the maximum dose to the skin rarely exceeded 100 percent of the prescription dose, thus eliminating skin spacing restrictions.

Breast-conservation therapy includes lumpectomy– the surgical removal of the cancerous tissue within the breast plus tissue immediately around the tumor – followed by radiation. This approach is an alternative to mastectomy, which removes the entire breast and is often followed by breast reconstruction.

Radiation treatment after a lumpectomy has traditionally involved irradiation of the entire breast with an external beam. Besides the inconvenience of the six-week-long regimen, many women must travel some distance to receive external-beam radiation. That can put additional stress on their families, jobs and financial resources.

For more information: www.ciannamedical.com


Related Content

News | PET Imaging

July 14, 2026 — New research is shedding new light on the biological basis of schizophrenia by directly measuring ...

Time July 15, 2026
arrow
News | Breast Imaging

July 7, 2026 — QT Imaging Holdings, Inc. recently announced it has successfully completed its first routine inspection ...

Time July 07, 2026
arrow
News | MRI Breast

July 2, 2026 – Quibim has announced the European and UK launch of QP-Breast, its CE and UKCA-marked AI tool which ...

Time July 02, 2026
arrow
News | Mammography

June 30, 2026 — The Food and Drug Administration has cleared new contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and CEM biopsy ...

Time June 30, 2026
arrow
News | Mammography

June 23, 2026 — Using artificial intelligence (AI), researchers found that image-based risk scores for breast cancer ...

Time June 24, 2026
arrow
News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

June 9, 2026 — An investigator at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai has received international recognition for ...

Time June 15, 2026
arrow
News | Ultrasound Imaging

May 26, 2026 — A soft, wearable ultrasound patch that can continuously monitor a fetus for hours at a time — and it can ...

Time May 27, 2026
arrow
News

May 21, 2026 – Artera, the developer of multimodal artificial intelligence (MMAI)-based prognostic and predictive cancer ...

Time May 22, 2026
arrow
News | FDA

May 6, 2026 — Artera, the developer of multimodal artificial intelligence (MMAI)-based prognostic and predictive cancer ...

Time May 07, 2026
arrow
News | X-Ray

April 29, 2026 — Results from a new study* presented at the American Roentgen Ray Society’s (ARRS) 2026 annual meeting ...

Time April 29, 2026
arrow
Subscribe Now