Justin Hernandez, MD

Justin Hernandez, MD


May 8, 2024 — Compared to males, women in radiology are at a consistently higher risk of not matching into diagnostic radiology programs, as are underrepresented minorities compared to their White counterparts, according to research presented at the 124th ARRS Annual Meeting.

“Our data indicate that there is a statistically significant difference in the relative risk of not matching into diagnostic radiology residency among different races and sexes,” wrote Justin Hernandez, MD, of California’s Loma Linda University Medical Center. “However, our data also suggests that these disparities are slowly decreasing over time.”

Armed with match data from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Hernandez et al. collected demographic information on diagnostic radiology residents over the past 7 years. To obtain a corresponding applicant pool, the Loma Linda team looked to the American Association of Medical Colleges’ website to analyze four years of Electronic Residency Application Service statistics. The researchers then compared race and gender composition of the applicant pool with resident enrollment to calculate relative risks of not matching for women and racial minorities.

Ultimately, across all years examined, women evidenced a higher relative risk of going unmatched than men, ranging from 1.02 in 2021–22 to 1.09 in 2015–16—p values being statistically significant for all years (except 2021–22). Furthermore, across all years again, underrepresented minorities showed a higher relative risk of going unmatched than White individuals. Specifically, the relative risk for Black individuals ranged from 1.33 in 2021–22 to 1.49 in 2015-16; for Hispanics, relative risk ranged from 1.19 in 2021–22 to 1.48 in 2015–16; for Asians, relative risk ranged from 1.04 in 2020–21 to 1.31 in 2015–16; and for Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islanders, relative risk ranged from 1.67 in 2015–16 to 1.76 in 2021–22.

“All p values were statistically significant, and the 95% confidence intervals for all relative risks did not overlap with 1.0, with the exception of Asian individuals in 2020–21,” Hernandez added.

For more information: www.arrs.org

Find more ARRS24 conference coverage here

 


Related Content

News | Radiation Oncology

April 27, 2026 — Radiation oncologists from across the country were in Washington in late April to warn lawmakers that ...

Time May 04, 2026
arrow
News

April 30, 2026 — The American College of Radiology has congratulated Nicole B. Saphier, MD, on her nomination to be ...

Time April 30, 2026
arrow
News | X-Ray

April 29, 2026 — Results from a new study* presented at the American Roentgen Ray Society’s (ARRS) 2026 annual meeting ...

Time April 29, 2026
arrow
News | Artificial Intelligence

April 20, 2026 — DeepTek, provider of the Augmento platform and deepc, the company behind deepcOS, have introduced a ...

Time April 23, 2026
arrow
News | Computed Tomography (CT)

April 2, 2026 — Nano-X Imaging Ltd. recently announced its U.S.-based subsidiary, Nanox Impact Inc., has signed a new ...

Time April 08, 2026
arrow
News | Teleradiology

April 1, 2026 — Premier Radiology Services has acquired Global Imaging Solutions (GLOBIS), a leading teleradiology group ...

Time April 03, 2026
arrow
News | Radiology Imaging

March 26, 2026 — GE HealthCare has announced a renewed research collaboration with Stanford Medicine Department of ...

Time March 30, 2026
arrow
News | Radiology Business

March 1, 2026 — A new study from the Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute found that practice turnover (i.e ...

Time March 19, 2026
arrow
News | Interventional Radiology

Feb.12, 2026 — The University of South Florida’s Center for Advanced Medical Learning and Simulation (CAMLS), part of ...

Time February 23, 2026
arrow
News | Breast Imaging

Feb. 16, 2026 — Rising demand for breast cancer screening and diagnostics is outpacing the supply of available breast ...

Time February 17, 2026
arrow
Subscribe Now