News | Radiation Therapy | May 20, 2019

New clinical data shows certain patients get similar results with five days of consecutive targeted treatment versus four to six weeks

Partial Breast Irradiation Effective, Convenient Treatment Option for Low-Risk Breast Cancer

May 20, 2019 — Partial breast irradiation produces similar long-term survival rates and risk for recurrence compared with whole breast irradiation for many women with low-risk, early-stage breast cancer, according to new clinical data. The data was derived from a national clinical trial involving researchers from The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute (OSUCCC – James).

This randomized, phase 3 study compared whole breast irradiation with partial breast irradiation in a large group of women with stage 0, 1 or 2 breast cancer. More than 4,200 patients were enrolled in the trial as part of NRG Oncology cooperative group clinical trial.

Study results showed that while partial breast irradiation does not produce equivalent cancer control for all breast cancer patients with stage 0, 1 and 2 disease, it should still be considered as an alternative for women with DCIS (ductal carcinoma in situ) and early-stage breast cancers deemed “low risk,” based on other tumor characteristics.

When looking at the entire study population, women who received partial breast irradiation experienced a 4.6 percent recurrence rate. Those who underwent whole breast irradiation experienced at 3.9 percent rate of recurrence. Toxicity from treatment was similar, as well as the risk for secondary cancers.

However, researchers also looked at how this played out in subsegments of the population and found that rates of recurrence were nearly identical for women with DCIS, regardless of whether they received whole or partial breast irradiation. This was also true for women with breast cancer classified as low-risk, based on the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) clinical guidelines.

Researchers showed that in this subsegment of breast cancer patients, the likelihood of recurrence 10 years post-treatment was very low overall and almost identical between women who received whole breast irradiation (2.3 percent) and partial breast irradiation (2.7 percent).

Julia White, M.D., co-principal investigator of the national trial and head of breast radiation oncology at the OSUCCC – James said this is very important because it reduces the burden of care for women who can still achieve cancer control with fewer treatments, over a shorter period of time.

“A significant portion of the breast cancer patient population nationally – about 25,000 to 30,000 women — would qualify for partial breast irradiation. This is tremendously important because it allows us to give women the right amount of treatment for her disease, and potentially allowing better access to effective breast conservation for those who live far from a radiation facility. Partial breast irradiation can also be delivered in five consecutive days versus whole breast, which can involve four to six consecutive weeks of multi-day treatment. There is no denying that the five day treatment is less costly and disruptive to life,” said White.

At the OSUCCC – James, breast radiation is also delivered in the face down (prone) position to reduce radiation exposure in the chest wall, which has been linked to increased risk of heart and lung disease post cancer treatment.

Data from this NRG Oncology study will be presented at the 2019 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting, May 31-June 4 in Chicago.

Watch the VIDEO: Whole Versus Partial Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer

For more information: www.cancer.osu.edu

 

Reference

1. Ganz P.A., Cecchini R.S., White J.R., et al. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in NRG oncology/NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413: A randomized phase III study of conventional whole breast irradiation (WBI) versus partial breast irradiation (PBI) in stage 0, I, or II breast cancer. Presented at ASCO 2019. J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl; abstr 508)


Related Content

News | Breast Imaging

July 7, 2026 — QT Imaging Holdings, Inc. recently announced it has successfully completed its first routine inspection ...

Time July 07, 2026
arrow
News | MRI Breast

July 2, 2026 – Quibim has announced the European and UK launch of QP-Breast, its CE and UKCA-marked AI tool which ...

Time July 02, 2026
arrow
News | Mammography

June 30, 2026 — The Food and Drug Administration has cleared new contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and CEM biopsy ...

Time June 30, 2026
arrow
News | Mammography

June 23, 2026 — Using artificial intelligence (AI), researchers found that image-based risk scores for breast cancer ...

Time June 24, 2026
arrow
News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

June 9, 2026 — An investigator at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai has received international recognition for ...

Time June 15, 2026
arrow
News | Radiation Therapy

June 3, 2026 — Alpha Tau Medical Ltd. and Tolmar International Ltd. have announced a strategic collaboration agreement ...

Time June 04, 2026
arrow
News | Ultrasound Imaging

May 26, 2026 — A soft, wearable ultrasound patch that can continuously monitor a fetus for hours at a time — and it can ...

Time May 27, 2026
arrow
News

May 21, 2026 – Artera, the developer of multimodal artificial intelligence (MMAI)-based prognostic and predictive cancer ...

Time May 22, 2026
arrow
News | ASTRO

May 18, 2026 — The American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) and the European Society for Radiotherapy and ...

Time May 19, 2026
arrow
News | FDA

May 6, 2026 — Artera, the developer of multimodal artificial intelligence (MMAI)-based prognostic and predictive cancer ...

Time May 07, 2026
arrow
Subscribe Now