News | Radiation Dose Management | February 04, 2016

Radiation fears based on unproven theoretical model, study finds

medical imaging, low-dose radiation, cancer, LNT model study

February 4, 2016 — The widespread belief that radiation from X rays, CT scans and other medical imaging can cause cancer is based on an unproven, decades-old theoretical model, according to a study published in the American Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The model, known as linear no-threshold (LNT), is used to estimate cancer risks from low-dose radiation such as medical imaging. But risk estimates based on this model “are only theoretical and, as yet, have never been conclusively demonstrated by empirical evidence,” corresponding author James Welsh, M.D., and colleagues write. Use of the LNT model drives unfounded fears and “excessive expenditures on putative but unneeded and wasteful safety measures.”

Welsh is a Loyola University Medical Center radiation oncologist and a professor in the Department of Radiation Oncology of Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine.

The LNT model dissuades many physicians from using appropriate imaging techniques and “discourages many in the public from getting proper and needed imaging, all in the name of avoiding any radiation exposure,” Welsh and colleagues write.

The authors reexamined the original studies, dating back more than 70 years, which led to adoption of the LNT model. This reappraisal found that the data reported in those studies do not actually support the LNT model.

In the LNT model, the well-established cancer-causing effects of high doses of radiation are extended downward in a straight line to very low doses. The LNT model assumes there is no safe dose of radiation, no matter how small. However, the human body has evolved the ability to repair damage from low-dose radiation that naturally occurs in the environment.

The LNT model dates to studies, conducted in the 1940s, of fruit flies exposed to various doses of radiation. The scientists who conducted those studies concluded there is no safe level of radiation, thus giving rise to the LNT model that is used to this day. But their conclusion was unwarranted because their experiments had not been done at truly low doses. A study exposing fruit flies to low-dose radiation wasn’t conducted until 2009, and this study did not support the LNT model.

Studies of atomic bomb survivors and other epidemiological studies of human populations have never conclusively demonstrated that low-dose radiation exposure can cause cancer.

Any claim that low-dose radiation from medical imaging procedures is known to cause cancer “should be vigorously challenged, because it serves to alarm and perhaps harm, rather than educate,” Welsh and colleagues write.

The authors conclude the LNT model “should finally and decisively be abandoned.”

The study is titled “The birth of the illegitimate linear no-threshold model – an invalid paradigm for estimating risk following low-dose radiation exposure.”

In addition to Welsh, co-authors are: Jeffry Siegel, Ph.D., president and CEO of Nuclear Physics Enterprises (first author); Charles Pennington of NAC International and Bill Sacks, M.D., Ph.D., emeritus medical officer in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Devices and Radiological Health.

 

Read the article, “Public Perception of Long-term Health Effects of Atomic Bomb Radiation Worse than Reality.”

 

Read the article “CT Cancer Risk Poorly Understood by Many Healthcare Providers.”

 

For more information: www.journals.lww.com/amjclinicaloncology

Related Content

Sponsored Content | Videos | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

With the recent launch of the Magnifico Open, Italian company Esaote has entered the open MRI whole body space. ITN had ...

Time January 24, 2022
arrow
News | Ultrasound Imaging

January 21, 2022 — According to an article in ARRS’ American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR), preoperative shear wave ...

Time January 21, 2022
arrow
Sponsored Content | Case Study | Computed Tomography (CT)

Approximately thirteen men out of every 100 will get prostate cancer during their lifetime, and about two to three men ...

Time January 21, 2022
arrow
Feature | Radiology Business | By Jef Williams

The Great Resignation has impacted every industry, including ours. While this movement will be studied for years to come ...

Time January 20, 2022
arrow
Feature | Coronavirus (COVID-19) | By Avielle Siegel, Paul J. Chang, David M. Paushter, et al.

A 26-year-old man with history of diabetes and hypertension presented with 7 days of fever, chills, nausea, intractable ...

Time January 19, 2022
arrow
Sponsored Content | Case Study | Ultrasound Imaging

The most common cause of chronic liver disease? Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). With 25% of the world’s ...

Time January 19, 2022
arrow
News | Coronavirus (COVID-19)

January 14, 2022 — The COVID-19 pandemic took the world by storm in early 2020 and has become since then the leading ...

Time January 14, 2022
arrow
News | Radiology Business

January 13, 2022 — The Board of Directors of Esaote, a leading Italian company in the biomedical sector – in ultrasound ...

Time January 13, 2022
arrow
News | Pediatric Imaging

January 12, 2022 — According to an article in ARRS’ American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR), whole-spine MRI commonly ...

Time January 12, 2022
arrow
News | Radiology Imaging

January 12, 2022 — Machine-learning methods are being actively developed for computed imaging systems like magnetic ...

Time January 12, 2022
arrow
Subscribe Now