News | Radiation Dose Management | February 04, 2016

Radiation fears based on unproven theoretical model, study finds

medical imaging, low-dose radiation, cancer, LNT model study

February 4, 2016 — The widespread belief that radiation from X rays, CT scans and other medical imaging can cause cancer is based on an unproven, decades-old theoretical model, according to a study published in the American Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The model, known as linear no-threshold (LNT), is used to estimate cancer risks from low-dose radiation such as medical imaging. But risk estimates based on this model “are only theoretical and, as yet, have never been conclusively demonstrated by empirical evidence,” corresponding author James Welsh, M.D., and colleagues write. Use of the LNT model drives unfounded fears and “excessive expenditures on putative but unneeded and wasteful safety measures.”

Welsh is a Loyola University Medical Center radiation oncologist and a professor in the Department of Radiation Oncology of Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine.

The LNT model dissuades many physicians from using appropriate imaging techniques and “discourages many in the public from getting proper and needed imaging, all in the name of avoiding any radiation exposure,” Welsh and colleagues write.

The authors reexamined the original studies, dating back more than 70 years, which led to adoption of the LNT model. This reappraisal found that the data reported in those studies do not actually support the LNT model.

In the LNT model, the well-established cancer-causing effects of high doses of radiation are extended downward in a straight line to very low doses. The LNT model assumes there is no safe dose of radiation, no matter how small. However, the human body has evolved the ability to repair damage from low-dose radiation that naturally occurs in the environment.

The LNT model dates to studies, conducted in the 1940s, of fruit flies exposed to various doses of radiation. The scientists who conducted those studies concluded there is no safe level of radiation, thus giving rise to the LNT model that is used to this day. But their conclusion was unwarranted because their experiments had not been done at truly low doses. A study exposing fruit flies to low-dose radiation wasn’t conducted until 2009, and this study did not support the LNT model.

Studies of atomic bomb survivors and other epidemiological studies of human populations have never conclusively demonstrated that low-dose radiation exposure can cause cancer.

Any claim that low-dose radiation from medical imaging procedures is known to cause cancer “should be vigorously challenged, because it serves to alarm and perhaps harm, rather than educate,” Welsh and colleagues write.

The authors conclude the LNT model “should finally and decisively be abandoned.”

The study is titled “The birth of the illegitimate linear no-threshold model – an invalid paradigm for estimating risk following low-dose radiation exposure.”

In addition to Welsh, co-authors are: Jeffry Siegel, Ph.D., president and CEO of Nuclear Physics Enterprises (first author); Charles Pennington of NAC International and Bill Sacks, M.D., Ph.D., emeritus medical officer in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Devices and Radiological Health.

 

Read the article, “Public Perception of Long-term Health Effects of Atomic Bomb Radiation Worse than Reality.”

 

Read the article “CT Cancer Risk Poorly Understood by Many Healthcare Providers.”

 

For more information: www.journals.lww.com/amjclinicaloncology

Related Content

Feature | Radiology Business | By Melinda Taschetta-Millane

Did you know that Imaging Technology News (ITN) maintains more than 40 comparison charts of product specifications from ...

Time August 12, 2022
arrow
News | Radiology Education

August 11, 2022 — After a three-year break, this spring featured the return of the anticipated Canon Roadshow Events ...

Time August 11, 2022
arrow
News | Computed Tomography (CT)

August 11, 2022 — For the first time, researchers successfully captured CT images of an entire woolly mammoth tusk ...

Time August 11, 2022
arrow
News | Radiology Imaging

August 11, 2022 — Bracco Imaging S.p.A. has announced the renewal of the “Bracco Fellowships” initiative, in partnership ...

Time August 11, 2022
arrow
News | Ultrasound Imaging

August 10, 2022 — Butterfly Network, Inc., a digital health company transforming care with handheld, whole-body ...

Time August 10, 2022
arrow
News | Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS)

August 10, 2022 — Mindray North America, a global leader and developer of healthcare technologies and solutions for ...

Time August 10, 2022
arrow
News | Breast Imaging

August 8, 2022 — The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Enhertu (fam-trastuzumab-deruxtecan-nxki), an IV ...

Time August 08, 2022
arrow
News | Lung Imaging

August 8, 2022 — Representatives from the Diagnostics Working Group of the IASLC Early Detection and Screening Committee ...

Time August 08, 2022
arrow
News | Lung Imaging

August 8, 2022 — A clinical trial is only as powerful as its participants. For years, researchers have struggled to fill ...

Time August 08, 2022
arrow
News | X-Ray

August 5, 2022 — GE Healthcare released its most advanced fixed X-ray system yet, the next-generation Definium 656 HD ...

Time August 05, 2022
arrow
Subscribe Now