News | Breast Imaging | June 26, 2017

NCCN Guidelines for Chest CT in Breast Cancer Reduce False Positives, Healthcare Spending

Siteman Cancer Center study uncovered potential to significantly improve NCCN Guidelines-concordant care in patients with early-stage breast cancer

NCCN Guidelines for Chest CT in Breast Cancer Reduce False Positives, Healthcare Spending

June 26, 2017 — A recent study appears to confirm the recommendations of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines panel against chest computed tomography (CT) scans in breast cancer patients asymptomatic for distant metastases. The study, conducted by researchers at Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, is published in the June issue of Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN).

According to SEER data, more than 260,000 women were diagnosed with breast cancer in the United States in 2016, most of whom were diagnosed with early-stage (stage I or II) disease. For this demographic, the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) recommend standard imaging with bilateral mammography and ultrasound and, in some cases, breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The NCCN Guidelines for Breast Cancer do not recommend chest computerized tomography (CT) scans in patients asymptomatic for distant metastases. Regardless, many asymptomatic patients undergo chest CT.

Using data from a prospective database, Barbara Dull, M.D., and colleagues studied records of more than 3,300 patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer between 1998 and 2012. They found that 11 percent of patients with stage I and more than 36 percent of patients with stage II breast cancer underwent chest CT within six months of diagnosis, despite NCCN Guidelines recommendations. Of these 683 patients, only nine were diagnosed with pulmonary metastases. However, benign pulmonary nodules were discovered in 175 patients.

“The overwhelming majority of nodules found in this study’s patient population classified as false positive results,” said Dull. “Not only do the costs of the chest CT and subsequent imaging and work-up put a cost constraint on the already burdened healthcare system, but the psychological impact of such results on a patient and their family is enormous.”

 “I hope patients and their physicians are reassured by findings like these,” added Amy Cyr, M.D., corresponding author of the study. “Chest CT and other staging studies are of extremely low yield for identifying metastases in patients with early-stage breast cancer, and even for the 1.3 percent of patients in our cohort ultimately diagnosed with pulmonary disease, many were not diagnosed because of that original CT scan, but were instead diagnosed on scans as long as two years after diagnosis, suggesting even lower utility. Unfortunately, for the 26.9 percent of patients with positive CT scans (the vast majority of which were false positives), the subsequent evaluation needed not only raises healthcare costs and anxiety, but also has the potential to delay oncologic treatment.”

According to the study, patients who underwent staging chest CT were generally younger and more likely to have unfavorable tumor markers. However, there were no statistical differences between patients diagnosed with metastases and those with false positive results.

“Even with numerous guidelines and recommendations, staging studies are routinely performed in patients with stage I and II breast cancer. Despite NCCN recommendations, many patients with asymptomatic early-stage breast cancer continue to undergo chest CT as part of their initial evaluation. Adherence to the NCCN Guidelines and other evidence-based recommendations will spare patients unnecessary testing and, in an era of increasing healthcare costs, also curb excessive spending,” said Dull.

“Notwithstanding the publicized potential risks of radiation exposure and the disputable value of chest CT in early-stage breast cancer, referring clinicians still order it, not infrequently, based on anecdotal cases, concerns regarding legal ramifications or to satisfy insistent patients. At all stages of cancer care, including at presentation, during neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy, and with advanced disease, evidence-based guidelines are needed to help direct treating physicians and their patients in selecting appropriate and indicated imaging studies,” said Pamela J. DiPiro, M.D., Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, in a June JNCCN commentary titled, “Evidence-Based Guidelines: Optimizing Imaging in Cancer Care.”

For more information: www.jnccn.org

Related Content

Videos | Computed Tomography (CT) | July 19, 2019
Quynh Truong, M.D., MPH, associate professor of radio
Low Doses of Radiation Promote Cancer-capable Cells
News | Radiation Dose Management | July 18, 2019
Low doses of radiation equivalent to three computed tomography (CT) scans, which are considered safe, give cancer-...
Paragon Biosciences Launches Qlarity Imaging to Advance FDA-cleared AI Breast Cancer Diagnosis System

Qlarity Imaging’s software is used to assist radiologists in the assessment and characterization of breast lesions. Imaging features are synthesized by an artificial intelligence algorithm into a single value, the QI score, which is analyzed relative to a database of reference abnormalities with known ground truth. Image courtesy of Business Wire.

Technology | Artificial Intelligence | July 18, 2019
Paragon Biosciences LLC announced the launch of its seventh portfolio company, Qlarity Imaging LLC, which was founded...
New Lung Ambition Alliance Aims to Double Five-year Lung Cancer Survival by 2025
News | Lung Cancer | July 17, 2019
The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC), Guardant Health, the Global Lung Cancer Coalition (...
Example of an intentionally truncated CT image

Figure 1: Example of an intentionally truncated CT image. The truncation percentage was calculated as the ratio of the patient border touching the field of view to the total patient border (red/(read+blue)). Image courtesy of Qaelum.

Feature | Radiation Dose Management | July 15, 2019 | Niki Fitousi, Ph.D., and An Dedulle
One of the main benefits of a radiation dose management system is the possibility to automatically generate alerts when...
Routine scan of abdomen pelvis taken with the UW-Madison’s Revolution 256 CT scanner using the FDA-cleared reconstruction algorithm, called TrueFidelity.

Routine scan of abdomen pelvis taken with the UW-Madison’s Revolution 256 CT scanner using the FDA-cleared reconstruction algorithm, called TrueFidelity. UW-Madison was the first site in the U.S. to get this technology. Its use is now being integrated into UW CT protocols. Image courtesy of Timothy P. Szczykutowicz

Feature | Computed Tomography (CT) | July 12, 2019 | By Greg Freiherr
When providers develop their own imaging protocols, they are wasting time and money, according to...
FDA Clears Koios DS Breast 2.0 AI-based Software
News | Ultrasound Women's Health | July 11, 2019
Koios Medical announced its second 510(k) clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Mednax National Cardiac Centers of Excellence Program Highlighted at SCCT 2019
News | CT Angiography (CTA) | July 11, 2019
Mednax Inc. and Mednax Radiology Solutions announced that Chief Medical Officer Ricardo C. Cury, M.D., FSCCT, will...