News | September 03, 2008

Molecular Breast Imaging May be More Effective than Mammography

September 4, 2008 – In the largest-ever study to compare molecular breast imaging (MBI) to mammography, researchers have shown that MBI can detect three times as many cancers in women who have dense breast patterns on their mammogram and are at increased risk of breast cancer.
According to study results are being presented this week at the American Society of Clinical Oncology’s 2008 Breast Cancer Symposium in Washington, D.C., a radioactive tracer used to detect cancer inside dense breasts, when compared to mammograms, revealed more tumors and giving fewer false alarms, doctors reported Wednesday.
The study, funded by Susan G. Komen for the Cure foundation and Bristol-Myers Squibb, maker of the imaging agent used in the study, analyzed findings on screening MBI and screening mammography (film or digital) in 940 high-risk women with mammographically confirmed dense breasts.
The women in the study were screened with both MBI and mammography. Participants had to meet two criteria. First, their breasts were determined to be dense by a previous mammogram. Second, they had an increased risk of breast cancer due to personal or family history, a genetic mutation related to breast cancer, a previous precancerous condition, or a history of radiation therapy to the chest.
A total of 13 tumors in 12 patients were detected: eight by MBI alone, one by mammography alone, two by both techniques, and two by neither. The recall rates (the number of women who needed follow-up testing) were 7.7 percent for MBI versus 9.4 percent for mammography. Of the 36 biopsies prompted by MBI, 27.8 percent were positive for cancer; of the 17 biopsies prompted by mammography, 17.6 percent were positive for cancer.
Researchers are continuing to follow all of the patients in the study, and so far 375 have been followed for 15 months or longer after the initial screening. Based on follow-up screening in these women, researchers determined the sensitivity (percent who were accurately diagnosed as positive for the disease) and specificity (percent of women who were accurately diagnosed as negative for the disease) of the two techniques. The sensitivity and specificity for MBI were 75 percent and 93.2 percent, respectively. By comparison, the sensitivity and specificity for mammography were 25 percent and 91.3 percent, respectively.
Researchers will follow-up with a clinical study comparing MBI to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting breast cancer. The federal government will fund a new study by Mayo Clinic that compares the two in 120 high-risk women with dense breasts. While MBI is more expensive than mammography, it is about one-fifth of the cost of breast MRI.

For more information: mayoclinic.org

Related Content

Transpara Deep Learning Software Matches Experienced Radiologists in Mammogram Reading
News | Computer-Aided Detection Software | January 12, 2018
Deep learning and artificial intelligence improves the efficiency and accuracy of reading mammograms, according to...
Women Prefer Getting Mammograms Every Year
News | Mammography | January 09, 2018
Women prefer to get their mammograms every year, instead of every two years, according to a new study presented at the...
Planmed Clarity 2-D Digital Mammography System Receives FDA Approval
Technology | Mammography | January 08, 2018
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an approval letter for the Planmed Clarity 2-D full-field digital...
Overweight Women May Need More Frequent Mammograms
News | Mammography | January 04, 2018
Women with higher body mass index (BMI) face an increased risk of not detecting their breast tumor until it has become...
About 25 percent of screening patients and 60 percent of diagnostic patients do not have prior mammograms available for comparison at the time of their examinations due to the lack of interoperability or other restrictions preventing clinicians from accessing prior exams.

About 25 percent of screening patients and 60 percent of diagnostic patients do not have prior mammograms available for comparison at the time of their examinations due to the lack of interoperability or other restrictions preventing clinicians from accessing prior exams.

Feature | Breast Imaging | January 02, 2018 | Kathryn Pearson Peyton, M.D.
Sixty million women undergo regular screening mammography in the United States, but even in the digital age, it is di
Double Black Announces Gemini Series Monitors for Multimodality and Digital Breast Imaging
Technology | Flat Panel Displays | December 28, 2017
December 28, 2017 — Double Black Imaging and their Image Systems Division are releasing their Gemini Series 6MP and 8
iCAD's PowerLook Tomo Detection Experiences Growing Adoption
News | Mammography | December 14, 2017
December 14, 2017 — iCAD Inc.
Siemens Healthineers Introduces Mammomat Revelation Mammography System for Improved Biopsy Workflow
Technology | Mammography | December 11, 2017
Siemens Healthineers unveiled the new Mammomat Revelation premium mammography platform at the 2017 Radiological Society...
Breast Cancer Screening Performance Impacted by Mean Mammographic Compression Pressure
News | Mammography | December 08, 2017
Dutch researchers demonstrated a strong relationship between compression pressure in mammography and breast cancer...
Videos | Mammography | December 06, 2017
Martin Yaffe, Ph.D., FAAPM, senior scientist, physical sciences/imaging research, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre,
Overlay Init