News | Mammography | February 09, 2017

False Positive Mammograms More Likely to Cause Delay of Next Screening

Study finds women who receive a true negative result are significantly more likely to come back for their next screening than women who receive a false positive

screening mammograms, false positive, true negative, screening behavior, Firas M. Dabbous, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention

February 9, 2017 — A new study published in Cancer Epidemiology: Biomarkers & Prevention found that women who had a false positive result from a screening mammogram were more likely to delay or forgo their subsequent screening mammogram than women who had a true negative result.

Women who have a false positive result from a screening mammogram often experience emotional, physical and economic stress, according to Firas M. Dabbous, Ph.D., manager of patient-centered outcomes research at the Russell Institute for Research & Innovation at the Advocate Lutheran General Hospital in Park Ridge, Ill, and author of the study. "We wanted to know whether having a false positive screening mammogram also causes women to delay coming back for their next screen," he said.

For this study, Dabbous and colleagues obtained data for women who received mammography screening through a large healthcare organization with multiple facilities in the greater metropolitan Chicago area. Among the 741,150 screening mammograms from 261,767 women included in the analysis were 12.3 percent that yielded a false positive result; the remaining 87.7 percent yielded true negative results.

The researchers found that women who had a false positive result were significantly less likely to have a subsequent screening mammogram in the database than women who had a true negative result; 22.1 percent of women who had a true negative and 15 percent of women who had a false positive had at least one subsequent screening mammogram in the database.

Among the women with more than one screening mammogram in the database, those who had a true negative result from the first mammogram were 36 percent more likely to have returned for a subsequent screen in the next 36 months compared to women who had a false positive result.

When delay in having a subsequent screen was defined as any mammogram performed more than 12 months after the first screening mammogram, the median delay was found to be significantly higher for women who had a false positive result compared with those who had a true negative result. The median delay was 13 months for those who had a false positive result compared with three months for those who had a true negative result.

The researchers then reanalyzed the data using different statistical methods to eliminate the chance for bias in the methods. Using propensity scoring matching, they found that women who had a true negative result were 34 percent more likely to return for a subsequent screen than those who had a false positive result, and that the median delays in returning for a subsequent screen were six months and 13 months, respectively.

In addition, the researchers found that the four-year cumulative risk of a late stage at diagnosis was 0.4 percent for those who had a false positive screening mammogram compared with 0.3 percent for those who had a true negative result. This difference was statistically significant.

"This [the fact that having a false positive screening mammogram caused women to delay coming back for their next screen] suggests that we need to more actively encourage women who have a false positive result from a screening mammogram to adhere to routine screening mammography recommendations because it has been shown to reduce breast cancer mortality," said Dabbous.

"Because we obtained the same conclusion using two different statistical approaches to analyze the data, we have a high degree of confidence in the results," he continued. "We believe that the delay in subsequent screening for women who have an initial false positive result increases the probability that they will subsequently receive a later-stage breast cancer diagnosis compared with women who first have a true negative result from a screening mammogram."

According to Dabbous, the main limitation of the study is the lack of ability to follow the women who did not show up for their next screen in this healthcare system because some may have received subsequent mammograms at different institutions. However, he noted that the results were similar when restricted to those who remained in the system and so the researchers are confident that this limitation did not bias the results.

The study was supported by a grant from the Agency for Health Research and Quality. Dabbous declares no conflicts of interest.

For more information: www.cebp.aacrjournals.org

References

Dabbous, F.M., Dolecek, T.A., Berbaum, M.L., Friedewald, S.M., et al. "Impact of a False-Positive Screening Mammogram on Subsequent Screening Behavior and Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis," Cancer Epidemiology: Biomarkers & Prevention. Published online Feb. 9, 2017. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0524

Related Content

Nebraska Enacts Cheri's Law for Breast Density Reporting
News | Breast Density | April 26, 2017
April 26, 2017 — Nebraska Gov.
Philips Showcases Newest MR-based Innovations at ISMRM 2017
News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) | April 24, 2017
Philips announced that it will feature the company’s latest magnetic resonance (MR) solutions and neurology-focused...
SPECT/CT Imaging Test Shown Accurate in Ruling Out Kidney Cancers
News | SPECT Imaging | April 24, 2017
The latest in a series of studies led by researchers at Johns Hopkins Medicine shows that addition of a widely...
New Clinical Data on Xoft System Presented at American Brachytherapy Society Annual Meeting
News | Brachytherapy Systems, Women's Healthcare | April 20, 2017
iCAD Inc. announced that updated clinical data on the use of intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) using the Xoft...
3-D-printed Model of Stenotic Intracranial Artery Enables Vessel-Wall MRI Standardization
News | 3-D Printing | April 18, 2017
April 18, 2017 — A collaboration between stroke neurologists at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) and b
3-D Prints Compare Effectiveness of Top Surgical Techniques for Repairing Heel Deformity
News | 3-D Printing | April 18, 2017
Using 3-D models of a patient’s foot, investigators at Cedars-Sinai have found that the three leading procedures for...
University of California Study Searches for Consistent CT Dose Best Practices
News | Radiation Dose Management | April 17, 2017
A new study led by UC San Francisco has found that radiation doses can be safely and effectively reduced – and more...
New MRI Technique Shows Effectiveness of Cystic Fibrosis Drug

Image courtesy of Toshiba Medical.

News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) | April 14, 2017
Researchers from the University of Missouri School of Medicine have developed an imaging technique using a specific...
Kentucky and Iowa Enact Breast Density Reporting Legislation
News | Breast Density | April 14, 2017
Kentucky and Iowa both this week joined the ranks of states with laws requiring mammography facilities to inform...
News | Mammography Reporting Software | April 13, 2017
April 13, 2017 — IDS recently announced Women’s Imaging Associates, a premier teleradiology firm located in Birmingha
Overlay Init