Expert medical organizations caution that evidence-based ordering of medically necessary imaging exams should not be denied due to widely disagreed upon radiation dose levels tracked in some electronic health record systems (EHRs).

August 17, 2021 — Expert medical organizations caution that evidence-based ordering of medically necessary imaging exams should not be denied due to widely disagreed upon radiation dose levels tracked in some electronic health record systems (EHRs).

In a joint statement, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine, American College of Radiology (ACR) and Health Physics Society urge providers to optimize imaging use with widely available evidence-based tools and base orders on clinical grounds — including prior imaging results. The joint statement also is endorsed by the Radiological Society of North America.

“Dose information tracked in EHRs is not standardized — or even universally accepted,” said Mahadevappa Mahesh, Ph.D., MS, FACR, chair of the ACR Medical Physics Commission. “Imaging history is useful to doctors as they work with patients to determine the best care, but still-evolving dose estimates should not be used to deny patients’ imaging exams prescribed by their doctors.”

Imaging exams are directly linked to greater life expectancy and declines in mortality rates. Scans reduce invasive surgeries, unnecessary hospital admissions and length of hospital stays. Arbitrary imaging limits, based on non-clinical factors, including dose quantities not broadly accepted by radiation safety experts, may lead to unintended consequences and negatively impact patient care.

“Every imaging exam has the potential to provide new information under constantly-changing clinical conditions,” said David B. Larson, M.D., MBA, chair of the ACR Quality and Safety Commission. “The decision to perform an exam must be made by doctors at the time the information is needed, not restricted by previous medical care, which represents water under the bridge.”

Read the Joint Statement and accompanying Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) document.

For more information about medical imaging radiation dose levels: radiologyinfo.org


Related Content

News | PACS

November 28, 2022 — At this week’s Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) annual meeting (November 27 – December 1 ...

Time November 28, 2022
arrow
News | RSNA

November 28, 2022 — Adam E. Flanders, M.D., FSIIM, a prolific mentor, author and pioneer for digital learning, was ...

Time November 28, 2022
arrow
News | Mammography

November 28, 2022 — The Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) has announced the launch of the RSNA Screening ...

Time November 28, 2022
arrow
News | Digital Radiography (DR)

November 28, 2022 — Konica Minolta Healthcare Americas, Inc., a leader in medical diagnostic imaging and healthcare ...

Time November 28, 2022
arrow
News | Radiation Oncology

November 28, 2022 — Dunlee unveiled its new oncology bundles in the U.S. for the first time at Radiological Society of ...

Time November 28, 2022
arrow
News | Artificial Intelligence

November 28, 2022 — Carestream Health will demonstrate the value and impact of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology ...

Time November 28, 2022
arrow
News | Electronic Medical Records (EMR)

November 28, 2022 — CareCloud, Inc., a leader in healthcare technology solutions for medical practices and health ...

Time November 28, 2022
arrow
News | Pediatric Imaging

November 28, 2022 — Using MRI data from the largest long-term study of brain development and child health in the United ...

Time November 28, 2022
arrow
News | Artificial Intelligence

November 28, 2022 — Flywheel, a leading data management platform for biomedical research and collaboration, is creating ...

Time November 28, 2022
arrow
News | RSNA | By Christine Book

November 27, 2022 — Among dozens of technical exhibit visits, informative discussions, and captivating Plenary Session ...

Time November 27, 2022
arrow
Subscribe Now