Expert medical organizations caution that evidence-based ordering of medically necessary imaging exams should not be denied due to widely disagreed upon radiation dose levels tracked in some electronic health record systems (EHRs).

August 17, 2021 — Expert medical organizations caution that evidence-based ordering of medically necessary imaging exams should not be denied due to widely disagreed upon radiation dose levels tracked in some electronic health record systems (EHRs).

In a joint statement, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine, American College of Radiology (ACR) and Health Physics Society urge providers to optimize imaging use with widely available evidence-based tools and base orders on clinical grounds — including prior imaging results. The joint statement also is endorsed by the Radiological Society of North America.

“Dose information tracked in EHRs is not standardized — or even universally accepted,” said Mahadevappa Mahesh, Ph.D., MS, FACR, chair of the ACR Medical Physics Commission. “Imaging history is useful to doctors as they work with patients to determine the best care, but still-evolving dose estimates should not be used to deny patients’ imaging exams prescribed by their doctors.”

Imaging exams are directly linked to greater life expectancy and declines in mortality rates. Scans reduce invasive surgeries, unnecessary hospital admissions and length of hospital stays. Arbitrary imaging limits, based on non-clinical factors, including dose quantities not broadly accepted by radiation safety experts, may lead to unintended consequences and negatively impact patient care.

“Every imaging exam has the potential to provide new information under constantly-changing clinical conditions,” said David B. Larson, M.D., MBA, chair of the ACR Quality and Safety Commission. “The decision to perform an exam must be made by doctors at the time the information is needed, not restricted by previous medical care, which represents water under the bridge.”

Read the Joint Statement and accompanying Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) document.

For more information about medical imaging radiation dose levels: radiologyinfo.org


Related Content

News | Enterprise Imaging

March 30, 2023 — Hyland Healthcare, whose solutions are used by more than half of the hospitals in the United States ...

Time March 30, 2023
arrow
News | Interventional Radiology

March 28, 2023 — Researchers found that a minimally invasive procedure combined with epidural steroid injection ...

Time March 28, 2023
arrow
News | Radiology Imaging

March 15, 2023 — Regions of the U.S. with an extreme level of socioeconomic disadvantage were less likely to have access ...

Time March 15, 2023
arrow
News | Breast Imaging

March 15, 2023 — In a study of over a million women, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) showed improved breast cancer ...

Time March 15, 2023
arrow
News | Artificial Intelligence

March 10, 2023 — Computed tomography (CT) is one of the most powerful and well-established diagnostic tools available to ...

Time March 10, 2023
arrow
News | Coronavirus (COVID-19)

March 10, 2023 — Researchers found evidence of heart muscle inflammation in a small number of patients with acute ...

Time March 10, 2023
arrow
Feature | Information Technology | By Melinda Taschetta-Millane

New for 2023, in each issue, Imaging Technology News (ITN) will profile a leader in radiology to share insight, updates ...

Time March 10, 2023
arrow
Feature | Radiology Business | By Christine Book

With an increasing focus on personalizing the patient experience and enhancing communication between radiologists and ...

Time March 10, 2023
arrow
Feature | PACS | By Michael Valante

It is widely appreciated that picture archiving and communication systems (PACS), vendor neutral archives (VNA) and ...

Time March 09, 2023
arrow
News | Artificial Intelligence

March 8, 2023 — An artificial intelligence (AI) tool can accurately identify normal and abnormal chest X-rays in a ...

Time March 08, 2023
arrow
Subscribe Now