Expert medical organizations caution that evidence-based ordering of medically necessary imaging exams should not be denied due to widely disagreed upon radiation dose levels tracked in some electronic health record systems (EHRs).

August 17, 2021 — Expert medical organizations caution that evidence-based ordering of medically necessary imaging exams should not be denied due to widely disagreed upon radiation dose levels tracked in some electronic health record systems (EHRs).

In a joint statement, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine, American College of Radiology (ACR) and Health Physics Society urge providers to optimize imaging use with widely available evidence-based tools and base orders on clinical grounds — including prior imaging results. The joint statement also is endorsed by the Radiological Society of North America.

“Dose information tracked in EHRs is not standardized — or even universally accepted,” said Mahadevappa Mahesh, Ph.D., MS, FACR, chair of the ACR Medical Physics Commission. “Imaging history is useful to doctors as they work with patients to determine the best care, but still-evolving dose estimates should not be used to deny patients’ imaging exams prescribed by their doctors.”

Imaging exams are directly linked to greater life expectancy and declines in mortality rates. Scans reduce invasive surgeries, unnecessary hospital admissions and length of hospital stays. Arbitrary imaging limits, based on non-clinical factors, including dose quantities not broadly accepted by radiation safety experts, may lead to unintended consequences and negatively impact patient care.

“Every imaging exam has the potential to provide new information under constantly-changing clinical conditions,” said David B. Larson, M.D., MBA, chair of the ACR Quality and Safety Commission. “The decision to perform an exam must be made by doctors at the time the information is needed, not restricted by previous medical care, which represents water under the bridge.”

Read the Joint Statement and accompanying Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) document.

For more information about medical imaging radiation dose levels: radiologyinfo.org


Related Content

Feature | Artificial Intelligence | By Melinda Taschetta-Millane

Jesse Ehrenfeld, MD, MPh, FAMIA, FASA, FCPP, president of the American Medical Association (AMA), addressed the topic of ...

Time September 22, 2023
arrow
News | Cardiac Imaging

September 21, 2023 — Declines in cardiovascular procedure volumes observed early in the COVID-19 pandemic greatly ...

Time September 21, 2023
arrow
Feature | Radiation Dose Management | By Melinda Taschetta-Millane

Early-stage detection is key to the prevention of life-threatening diseases; however, limited access to data hinders the ...

Time September 20, 2023
arrow
News | Artificial Intelligence

September 19, 2023 — Clearpath Technologies announced the launch of its patient solution, PatientConnect, which it ...

Time September 19, 2023
arrow
News | Computed Tomography (CT)

September 19, 2023 — An advanced CT test can identify individuals with stable angina at a reduced risk of three-year ...

Time September 19, 2023
arrow
News | Mobile C-Arms

September 14, 2023 — Royal Philips, a global leader in health technology, today announced the launch of Philips Image ...

Time September 14, 2023
arrow
News | Ultrasound Imaging

September 8, 2023 — When diagnosing and treating cancer patients, the dynamics of blood flow to and from a suspected ...

Time September 08, 2023
arrow
News | Mammography

September 5, 2023 — Using a standardized assessment, researchers in the UK compared the performance of a commercially ...

Time September 05, 2023
arrow
News | Radiology Imaging

August 31, 2023 — A new article published in RadioGraphics, a journal of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA ...

Time August 31, 2023
arrow
News | Ultrasound Imaging

August 30, 2023 — Clarius Mobile Health, a leading provider of high-definition handheld ultrasound systems, and Echo ...

Time August 30, 2023
arrow
Subscribe Now