News | January 09, 2014

Breast Cancer Study Compares Targeted Radiotherapy During Surgery to Traditional Post-Surgical Radiotherapy

radiation therapy women's health zeiss intrabeam TARGIT EBRT TARGIT-A
January 9, 2014 — A clinical trial for breast cancer, published in the medical journal The Lancet, shows that a single fraction of targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (TARGIT) delivered with the Zeiss Intrabeam at time of lumpectomy is non-inferior to traditional external beam radiation (EBRT) delivered over three to six weeks after breast conserving surgery, for a select group of patients.
 
“The most important benefit of TARGIT for a woman with breast cancer is that it allows her to complete her entire local treatment at the time of her operation, with lower toxicity to the breast, the heart and other organs,” said Jayant Vaidya, M.D., Ph.D., FRCS, international TARGIT investigators group, in the accompanying press release on the Lancet publication of the research study. “Our research supports the use of TARGIT concurrent with lumpectomy, provided patients are selected carefully, and should allow patients and their clinicians to make a more informed choice about individualizing their treatment, saving time, money, breasts and lives.”
 
Since 1998, the international TARGIT research group has investigated whether radiotherapy targeted to the tumor bed at the time of surgery can reduce the risk of recurrence in early breast cancer as effectively as the traditional three- to six-week EBRT.
 
Traditionally, whole-breast EBRT is given after lumpectomy to reduce the risk of recurrence of cancer in the breast and breast cancer mortality. EBRT typically is given over a course of three to six weeks requiring patients to receive treatment at radiotherapy centers for 20 to 30 days. In some cases, women suitable for breast conserving surgery but living far from a radiotherapy center and unable to attend daily post-surgical treatments may even undergo mastectomy as an alternative.
 
In the TARGIT approach, during surgery after removal of the tumor, the affected tissue in the tumor bed is irradiated from within the breast using the Zeiss Intrabeam. The TARGIT study results show that targeted intraoperative radiotherapy delivered with Zeiss Intrabeam can reduce the risk of recurrence of the cancer as effectively as the traditional course of whole breast irradiation in selected women with invasive ductal carcinoma.
 
The TARGIT-A trial has been to date the largest multicenter randomized clinical trial for intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) in the field of partial breast irradiation, with 3451 patients in 33 international centers from Europe, the United States and Australia. The TARGIT-A trial followed an individualized risk-adapted approach — meaning patients who had received TARGIT at the time of surgery showed in the final pathology additional unforeseen risk factors — received supplemental EBRT, which occurred for about 15 percent of the patients. The five-year results for local recurrence and the first analysis of overall survival of the TARGIT-A trial have now been reported.
 
Comparing TARGIT with EBRT, the difference in five-year local recurrence between the two treatments was less than 2.5 percent and therefore considered non-inferior to standard EBRT in treating the cancer. Overall mortality was 3.9 percent with TARGIT and 5.3 percent with EBRT due to fewer deaths from cardiovascular causes and other cancers.
 
Based on statistical comparison of breast cancer recurrence, number of deaths and side effects of TARGIT versus EBRT the authors concluded, “TARGIT concurrent with lumpectomy within a risk-adapted approach should be considered as an option for eligible patients with breast cancer carefully selected as per the TARGIT-A trial protocol.”
 
A PDF of the Lancet publication of the results of the TARGIT-A study can be found here.
 

Related Content

RayStation Selected for New Carbon Ion Therapy Center in Japan
News | Treatment Planning | January 18, 2018
January 18, 2018 – RayStation has been chosen as the treatment planning system for a new carbon-ion therapy facility
Raysearch Receives First Order for the Raycare Oncology Information System
News | Oncology Information Management Systems (OIMS) | January 18, 2018
January 18, 2018 – Anderson Regional Cancer Center (ARCC) in Meridian, Mississippi, has placed the first order for...
Transpara Deep Learning Software Matches Experienced Radiologists in Mammogram Reading
News | Computer-Aided Detection Software | January 12, 2018
Deep learning and artificial intelligence improves the efficiency and accuracy of reading mammograms, according to...
Fat Distribution in Women and Men Provides Clues to Heart Attack Risk
News | Women's Health | January 11, 2018
January 11, 2018 – It’s not the amount of fat in your body but where it is stored that may increase your risk for hea
Women Prefer Getting Mammograms Every Year
News | Mammography | January 09, 2018
Women prefer to get their mammograms every year, instead of every two years, according to a new study presented at the...
Planmed Clarity 2-D Digital Mammography System Receives FDA Approval
Technology | Mammography | January 08, 2018
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an approval letter for the Planmed Clarity 2-D full-field digital...
Overweight Women May Need More Frequent Mammograms
News | Mammography | January 04, 2018
Women with higher body mass index (BMI) face an increased risk of not detecting their breast tumor until it has become...
Mevion Receives 510(k) Clearance for Hyperscan Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy
Technology | Proton Therapy | January 04, 2018
Mevion Medical Systems has received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 510(k) clearance for the Mevion S250i...
Study Compares Radiosurgery and Whole-Brain Radiation in Lung Cancer Patients With Multiple Brain Metastases
News | Radiation Therapy | January 03, 2018
Although targeted therapies have produced dramatic advances in the ability to control some types of advanced lung...
About 25 percent of screening patients and 60 percent of diagnostic patients do not have prior mammograms available for comparison at the time of their examinations due to the lack of interoperability or other restrictions preventing clinicians from accessing prior exams.

About 25 percent of screening patients and 60 percent of diagnostic patients do not have prior mammograms available for comparison at the time of their examinations due to the lack of interoperability or other restrictions preventing clinicians from accessing prior exams.

Feature | Breast Imaging | January 02, 2018 | Kathryn Pearson Peyton, M.D.
Sixty million women undergo regular screening mammography in the United States, but even in the digital age, it is di
Overlay Init