Dave Fornell, ITN Editor

Dave Fornell is the editor of Diagnostic & Interventional Cardiology magazine and assistant editor for Imaging Technology News magazine.

Blog | May 06, 2014

New Medicare Legislation Mandates Clinical Decision Support

As an editor attending clinical symposiums and always on the lookout for new trends in technology, I sometimes find myself wondering if what I see is actually the reality on the ground for most clinicians. A recent example of this has been the implementation and use of clinical decision support (CDS) software to ensure physicians are following appropriate use criteria (AUC). While use of this software was outlined in Stage 2 Meaningful Use requirements for electronic medical records (EMR) and has been a topic in nearly all the sessions I attend on the future of healthcare, few vendors or clinicians I speak with thought much of CDS. Fewer yet were clamoring for information about it or highlighting it as a key product in vendor booths on show floors. At HIMSS.14, the largest medical IT show in the world, I had to search to find the few vendors that were highlighting CDS. This led me to question if I was just out of touch with the real world and if readers really had any interest in CDS.

I felt vindicated when the Senate passed the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 (H.R. 4302) March 31, also known as the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) patch legislation. The big news is it delays a 24 percent Medicare physician payment cut for 12 months (the 17th such patch to delay cuts since the ill-conceived legislation was created). However, the fine print in the legislation now mandates the use of CDS software to show tests and procedures ordered meet AUC set by medical societies in order to get full Medicare/Medicaid reimbursement.

The reason for the CDS requirement is to make large strides toward modernizing the American healthcare system by requiring evidence-based medicine. What may be first-of-its kind requirements included in the patch are aimed at making healthcare more efficient, raising medical imaging quality, improving utilization accuracy and making physician payment policy more transparent.

 
Admittedly, CDS software may not be very exciting. Many physicians also take issue with CDS software, because they feel it calls into question their ability for professional decision-making regarding patient care. However, Medicare and Congress have made it a priority. As such, I suspect many hospitals and IT departments will be clamoring for more information on CDS software. DAIC has already seen an up tick in interest with its online content in this area and recently launched a channel devoted to this topic (www.dicardiology.com/taxonomy/term/3850).
 
The May-June issue of DAIC includes a quick breakdown of the SGR patch legislation highlights. There also is an article on that explains CDS software that is currently available for cardiology and radiology, including examples of how it has been implemented.
 

Related Content

News | Clinical Decision Support

April 22, 2021 — Change Healthcare unveiled InterQual 2021, the latest edition of the company’s flagship clinical ...

Time April 22, 2021
arrow
News | Clinical Decision Support

April 2, 2021 — Elsevier, a global leader in research publishing and information analytics, announced a partnership with ...

Time April 02, 2021
arrow
News | Clinical Decision Support

June 16, 2020 — Philips and The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center announced a collaboration to provide ...

Time June 16, 2020
arrow
News | Clinical Decision Support

March 13, 2020 — IBM Watson Health and EBSCO Information Services (EBSCO) announced a strategic collaboration aimed ...

Time March 13, 2020
arrow
News | Clinical Decision Support

December 26, 2019 — Effective Jan. 1, 2020, new regulations under the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) ...

Time December 26, 2019
arrow
Videos | Radiology Business

Association for Medical Imaging Management (AHRA) President Chris Tomlinson, CRA, FAHRA, and President-elect Jacqui Rose ...

Time August 02, 2019
arrow
News | Clinical Decision Support

On June 30, 2019, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine has been designated a qualified provider-led entity (qPLE). This allows Johns Hopkins to develop criteria that meet the requirements of the federal Protecting Access to Medicare Act (PAMA) of 2014 when ordering diagnostic imaging tests such as computed tomography (CT) scans, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and nuclear imaging in the emergency department and ambulatory settings.

Time July 18, 2019
arrow
News | Digital Pathology

July 16, 2019 — Computational pathology company Paige announced the publication of an article in Nature Medicine ...

Time July 16, 2019
arrow
News | Ultrasound Women's Health

Koios Medical announced its second 510(k) clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Time July 11, 2019
arrow
Technology | Mammography Reporting Software

Three Palm Software announced the release of the 1.8.8 version of its breast imaging workstation, WorkstationOne. This release builds on the existing comprehensive support for mammography, with enhancements in several areas. An emphasis of this release is expanded custom display mechanisms for new mammography computer-aided detection (CAD) systems, decision support and breast density reports. This includes customized report display for approximately 20 different vendors (not all of which are available for clinical use yet).

Time June 12, 2019
arrow
Subscribe Now