Three major medical associations will continue to press their federal lawsuit to block implementation of parts of the Surprise Billing Interim Final Rule in the wake of a last-minute government challenge to a Feb. U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas ruling  that vacated those parts of the rule.

Getty Images


April 25, 2022 — Three major medical associations will continue to press their federal lawsuit to block implementation of parts of the Surprise Billing Interim Final Rule in the wake of a last-minute government challenge to a Feb. U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas ruling  that vacated those parts of the rule.

The case filed by the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP), American College of Radiology (ACR) and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) has been stayed while the government determined whether it would appeal the Texas court ruling in the suit brought by the Texas Medical Association (TMA). Now that the government has appealed the TMA decision, ACEP, ACR, and ASA stand ready to pursue their case to halt the government’s unlawful rule.

ACEP, ACR and ASA filed their suit to prevent insurer use of the rule’s independent dispute resolution (IDR) process to raise profits by narrowing medical networks, which denies patients their choice of providers and may delay diagnosis and treatment of illness and injury.

The Illinois and Texas cases solely impact the IDR process to determine provider reimbursement for out of network care. Neither case affects the No Surprises Act patient protections against out-of-network medical bills. Neither case would raise patient out-of-pocket costs.

ACEP, ACR and ASA will work with legal partners and patient advocates to ensure that the Surprise Billing Interim Final Rule ultimately complies with the text and spirit of the No Surprises Act as passed by Congress.

For more information: www.acr.org

Related content:

CMS Withdraws Guidance on Surprise Billing, Out-of-Network Payment Disputes

ACR Joins "No Surprises Act" Lawsuit to Protect Patient Care

Major Medical Associations Ask Federal Court for Summary Judgement in No Surprises Lawsuit


Related Content

Feature | Radiation Oncology

The radiation oncology community lost a leader this past summer, with the passing of Jay Loeffler, MD, FACR, FASTRO. He ...

Time September 21, 2023
arrow
News | Artificial Intelligence

September 20, 2023 — Medical imaging artificial intelligence (AI) company Annalise.ai has announced that the results ...

Time September 20, 2023
arrow
News | Radiation Therapy

September 20, 2023 — RefleXion Medical, Inc., a therapeutic oncology company and 3B Pharmaceuticals (3BP) GmbH, a ...

Time September 20, 2023
arrow
Sponsored Content | Case Study | Radiology Imaging | By Tim Hodson

In June, the Philips Radiology Experience Tour hit the road to provide healthcare professionals with an opportunity to ...

Time September 19, 2023
arrow
News | Radiation Oncology

September 13, 2023 — Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) should be the preferred choice when treating patients ...

Time September 13, 2023
arrow
News | RSNA

September 12, 2023 — The Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) launched “RSNA Market Insights,” a series of ...

Time September 12, 2023
arrow
News | Radiation Oncology

September 12, 2023 — Michael J. Zelefsky, MD, a renowned leader in radiation oncology, is joining NYU Langone’s ...

Time September 12, 2023
arrow
News | Artificial Intelligence

September 12, 2023 — Medical imaging Artificial Intelligence (AI) company Qure.ai has announced a pivotal 510(k) ...

Time September 12, 2023
arrow
News | ASTRO

September 7, 2023 — American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) President Jeff Michalski, MD, MBA, FASTRO, will join ...

Time September 07, 2023
arrow
News | Artificial Intelligence

September 7, 2023 — Paige, a provider of end-to-end digital pathology solutions and clinical AI, has announced a ...

Time September 07, 2023
arrow
Subscribe Now