Three major medical associations will continue to press their federal lawsuit to block implementation of parts of the Surprise Billing Interim Final Rule in the wake of a last-minute government challenge to a Feb. U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas ruling  that vacated those parts of the rule.

Getty Images


April 25, 2022 — Three major medical associations will continue to press their federal lawsuit to block implementation of parts of the Surprise Billing Interim Final Rule in the wake of a last-minute government challenge to a Feb. U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas ruling  that vacated those parts of the rule.

The case filed by the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP), American College of Radiology (ACR) and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) has been stayed while the government determined whether it would appeal the Texas court ruling in the suit brought by the Texas Medical Association (TMA). Now that the government has appealed the TMA decision, ACEP, ACR, and ASA stand ready to pursue their case to halt the government’s unlawful rule.

ACEP, ACR and ASA filed their suit to prevent insurer use of the rule’s independent dispute resolution (IDR) process to raise profits by narrowing medical networks, which denies patients their choice of providers and may delay diagnosis and treatment of illness and injury.

The Illinois and Texas cases solely impact the IDR process to determine provider reimbursement for out of network care. Neither case affects the No Surprises Act patient protections against out-of-network medical bills. Neither case would raise patient out-of-pocket costs.

ACEP, ACR and ASA will work with legal partners and patient advocates to ensure that the Surprise Billing Interim Final Rule ultimately complies with the text and spirit of the No Surprises Act as passed by Congress.

For more information: www.acr.org

Related content:

CMS Withdraws Guidance on Surprise Billing, Out-of-Network Payment Disputes

ACR Joins "No Surprises Act" Lawsuit to Protect Patient Care

Major Medical Associations Ask Federal Court for Summary Judgement in No Surprises Lawsuit


Related Content

News | Innovative Hospitals

July 27, 2026 — Vanderbilt Health and Siemens Healthineers have entered into a multi-year, $87 million Value ...

Time July 28, 2026
arrow
News | RSNA

July 15, 2026 — The Radiological Society of North America has announced its lineup of plenary speaker for RSNA 2026 ...

Time July 21, 2026
arrow
News | Radiology Imaging

July 20, 2026 — Bracco Imaging has earned the 2026 EcoVadis Platinum Medal, the highest level of recognition awarded by ...

Time July 21, 2026
arrow
News | ACR

July 15, 2026 — The American College of Radiology (ACR) recently issued a statement praising the inclusion of the ...

Time July 16, 2026
arrow
News | Ultrasound Imaging

July 13, 2026 — Neal F. Kassell, MD, founder and chairman of the Focused Ultrasound Foundation, received the inaugural ...

Time July 13, 2026
arrow
News | Radiation Oncology

July 10, 2026 — A new study led by researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai found that although the ...

Time July 10, 2026
arrow
News | Interventional Radiology

June 25, 2026 — Radiologists performing no interventional radiology-related (IR-related) work increased from one-third ...

Time June 25, 2026
arrow
News | Artificial Intelligence

June 15, 2026 — HOPPR recently announced that HOPPR AI Foundry is now available in AWS Marketplace. The availability ...

Time June 19, 2026
arrow
News | Women's Health

June 2, 2026 — Results of an American College of Radiology-managed retrospective study involving 110,000 women presented ...

Time June 02, 2026
arrow
News | Radiation Oncology

April 27, 2026 — Radiation oncologists from across the country were in Washington in late April to warn lawmakers that ...

Time May 04, 2026
arrow
Subscribe Now