Feature | Breast Imaging | December 29, 2015

Study also finds there was a greater proportion of invasive and node-negative cancers in those who had ultrasound

Breast ultrasound, ABUS

December 29, 2015 - The use of ultrasound (US) in detecting breast cancer has been shown to be comparable in its sensitivity to that of mammography and should be considered when testing for the disease according to a study published Dec. 28 in the JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

The number of breast cancers is increasing across the globe, with over 1.6 million new cases of the disease in 2010, resulting in the deaths of over 425,000 women.  Additionally, 2.1 million new breast cancer cases are expected by 2030.  While mammography is an effective method in detecting breast cancer in developed countries, it is not commonly available in less developed nations, and alternative methods, such as ultrasound, need to be tested.

To determine the effectiveness of using ultrasound to detect breast cancer, Wendie A. Berg, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Radiology, Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pa., and colleagues recruited 2,809 women across 20 different sites in the United States, Canada, and Argentina to the American College of Radiology Imaging Network protocol 6666 breast cancer screening study.  Of the participants, 2,662 completed three annual breast screenings by US and film-screen or digital mammography, and then had a biopsy or a 12-month follow-up.

The researchers found that the number of US screens to detect breast cancer was comparable to that of mammography, and found that there was a greater proportion of invasive and node-negative cancers in those who had US; however, there was also a greater number of false-positives among the women screened with US. While the false-positive rate of US exceeds that of mammography, the number of women recalled for extra testing becomes more comparable on incidence screening rounds, the authors write.  

“Where mammography is available, US should be seen as a supplemental test for women with dense breasts who do not meet high-risk criteria for screening MRI and for high-risk women with dense breasts who are unable to tolerate MRI,” Berg said.

For more information: www.oxfordjournals.org/our_journals/jnci/press_releases/bergdjv367.pdf


Related Content

News | HIMSS

March 5, 2026 — At the Health Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) Conference & Exhibition 2026 in Las ...

Time March 06, 2026
arrow
News | Women's Health

March 4, 2026 — QT Imaging Holdings recently announced that Mary W. Yamashita, MD will serve as medical advisor to the ...

Time March 06, 2026
arrow
News | Radiation Oncology

March 4, 2026 — Lunit has announced that 21 studies featuring its AI solutions will be presented at the European ...

Time March 05, 2026
arrow
News | Artificial Intelligence

March 2, 2026 — RadNet, Inc. has acquired Gleamer SAS, a radiology AI company based in Paris, France. Gleamer will be ...

Time March 03, 2026
arrow
News | Ultrasound Women's Health

March 2, 2026 — Ultrasound AI, a provider of artificial intelligence applications for medical imaging, has received FDA ...

Time March 03, 2026
arrow
News | FDA

Feb. 26, 2026 — AS Software, a provider of specialty-focused ultrasound reporting solutions, has announced that the U.S ...

Time March 02, 2026
arrow
News | Ultrasound Imaging

Feb. 25, 2026 — GE HealthCare is introducing the next generation of LOGIQ general imaging ultrasound systems – an ...

Time February 25, 2026
arrow
News | Women's Health

Feb.23, 2026 — The first clinical patient received a Clairity Breast cancer risk score, marking a historic milestone in ...

Time February 23, 2026
arrow
News | Breast Biopsy Systems

Feb. 18, 2026 — Mammotome, a Danaher company, has introduced the Mammotome Prima MR Dual Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy ...

Time February 18, 2026
arrow
News | Breast Imaging

Feb. 16, 2026 — Rising demand for breast cancer screening and diagnostics is outpacing the supply of available breast ...

Time February 17, 2026
arrow
Subscribe Now