radiation therapy, androgen deprivation therapy

September 15, 2014 — High-risk prostate cancer patients who receive radiation therapy (RT) and an 18-month course of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) recover a normal testosterone level in a shorter amount of time compared to those who receive a 36-month course of ADT, thus resulting in a better quality of life (QOL) and without detriment to long-term outcomes, according to research presented at the American Society for Radiation Oncology’s (ASTRO’s) 56th annual meeting.

Researchers analyzed data from 561 patients with high-risk prostate cancer from a multi-center, randomized phase III trial in Canada (PCS IV clinical trials, Gov. # NCT 00223171). The patients received RT and long-term ADT. A common ancillary treatment for prostate cancer, ADT reduces levels of androgen hormones in order to prevent prostate cancer cells from growing.

Patients were randomized into two groups—one group of 289 patients who received 18 months of androgen deprivation therapy and RT, and a second group of 272 patients who received 36 months of ADT and RT. In both groups, RT started four months after the beginning of ADT.

Patients’ serum testosterone levels were measured at baseline and then at each follow-up visit to assess testosterone levels and recovery time. “Abnormal testosterone” was defined as below the normal level. (This study defined normal testosterone level as the normal ranges given by each hospital lab participating in the trial.) The time to testosterone recovery between the two groups was compared via Kaplan Meier and log rank tests. All items and scales scores were analyzed with general linear model and repeated measures. Researchers evaluated changes between patients who did recover normal testosterone levels over time, versus those who did not.

With a median follow-up time of 84 months, 55.7 percent (161) patients in the 18-month ADT group recovered normal testosterone levels.  In comparison, 44.9 percent (122) patients of the 36-month ADT group recovered normal testosterone levels. Additionally, median time to testosterone recovery was shorter (47.2 months; range 40.1 – 54.3 months), in the 18-month ADT group, compared to the 36-month ADT group (73.2 months, range 58.3 – 88.2 months.)

Patients’ QOL measurements were assessed using two validated tools: a 30-item questionnaire (EORTC30) and a 25-item questionnaire (EORTC PR25). The 55 items were regrouped into 21 scales; all items and scales scores were linearly transformed to a 0 to 100-point scale. Patient-reported questionnaires were completed before treatment; every six months during ADT; four months post-ADT; and then once a year for five years after treatment. For patients who developed biochemical failure (elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels),QOL evaluations ceased upon beginning a new course of ADT.

When comparing QOL between patients who recovered normal testosterone with those who did not, patients with testosterone recovery had a better QOL:  26 of 55 items and 12 of 21 scales were statistically significant. Similarly, 5 of 26 items and 1 of 21 scales that reached statistical significance were also clinically relevant.

“The results of the analysis are not surprising considering the side effects of ADT, and that testosterone recovery has significant impact on patients’ improved quality of life,” said lead author Abdenour Nabid, M.D., a radiation oncologist at Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke and an associate professor at the University of Sherbrooke in Quebec, Canada. “In high-risk prostate cancer, the current guideline for ADT duration is between two and three years. Because of improvement in testosterone recovery and quality of life, a good first step could be to choose ADT for two years until we obtain the final results of the ongoing phase III PCS IV trial, which compares 18 months of ADT to 36 months of ADT.”

The abstract, “Quality of Life in Patients with Testosterone Recovery after Long Term Androgen Deprivation Therapy for High Risk Prostate Cancer,” was presented in detail during a scientific session at ASTRO’s 56th Annual Meeting.

For more information: www.astro.org


Related Content

News | Lung Imaging

Sept. 8, 2026 – Brainomix and Endeavor BioMedicines recently presented positive results from the Brainomix AI-driven ...

Time September 09, 2026
arrow
News | Ultrasound Imaging

Sept. 2, 2026 – Sonex Health and The Institute of Advanced Ultrasound Guided Procedures have announced publication of ...

Time September 04, 2026
arrow
News | Radiation Oncology

Sept. 2, 2026 — Children with one of the deadliest forms of brain cancer may benefit from an additional course of ...

Time September 03, 2026
arrow
News | Radiology Imaging

Sept. 1, 2026— A new study from the Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute found that the odds of imaging following an ...

Time September 01, 2026
arrow
News | RSNA

Aug. 18, 2026 —The board of trustees of the Radiological Society of North America's (RSNA) Research & Education (R&E) ...

Time August 24, 2026
arrow
News | PET Imaging

July 14, 2026 — New research is shedding new light on the biological basis of schizophrenia by directly measuring ...

Time July 15, 2026
arrow
News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

June 9, 2026 — An investigator at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai has received international recognition for ...

Time June 15, 2026
arrow
News | Ultrasound Imaging

May 26, 2026 — A soft, wearable ultrasound patch that can continuously monitor a fetus for hours at a time — and it can ...

Time May 27, 2026
arrow
News | Women's Health

May 6, 2026 — GE HealthCare has announced the availability of MIM ComboTherapy GYN HDR/EBRT2, a solution designed to ...

Time May 06, 2026
arrow
News | Radiation Therapy

April 30, 2026 — The Siemens Healthineers business area, Varian, has been awarded up to $60 million over five years by ...

Time April 30, 2026
arrow
Subscribe Now