News | Lung Imaging | March 29, 2021

Updated USPSTF LCS guidelines based solely on age, pack-years, and quit-years perpetuate eligibility disparities among racial and ethnic minorities, although incorporating certain risk prediction models may help reduce such inequalities

Ultimately, because LYFS-CT may exclude minority patients who could benefit from LCS and underestimate the benefits of LCS, the authors of this AJR article suggested "augmenting LCS eligibility for minority patients using combinations of models"--specifically, the PLCOm2012 model in conjunction with LYFS-CT and USPSTF-2020. Image courtesy of American Roentgen Ray Society (ARRS), American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR)

Ultimately, because LYFS-CT may exclude minority patients who could benefit from LCS and underestimate the benefits of LCS, the authors of this AJR article suggested "augmenting LCS eligibility for minority patients using combinations of models"--specifically, the PLCOm2012 model in conjunction with LYFS-CT and USPSTF-2020. Image courtesy of American Roentgen Ray Society (ARRS), American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR)


March 29, 2021 — According to ARRS' American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR), updated United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) lung cancer screening (LCS) guidelines based solely on age, pack-years, and quit-years perpetuate eligibility disparities among racial and ethnic minorities, although incorporating certain risk prediction models may help reduce such inequalities.

By pulling data from the 2015 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), Journal of the National Cancer Institute researchers (Landy et al.) were able to "estimate the effects of USPSTF-2020 guidelines on disparities in LCS eligibility for the non-institutionalized civilian US population," wrote Massachusetts General Hospital radiologists Efrén J. Flores and Anand K. Narayan in their AJR critique. In connecting this NHIS dataset to the National Death Index, the original researchers were able to not only estimate eligibility but also model any possible effects of guideline changes on preventable lung cancer deaths.

"However," Flores and Narayan contended, "by modeling the effects of changes instead of measuring actual outcomes, the authors' conclusions that LCS disparities can be nearly eliminated by using alternative eligibility criteria reflects an aspirational goal." In fact, updated criteria must be used alongside outreach efforts to ensure equitable access and appropriate follow-up.

To define eligibility based on individual risk as well as life expectancy, Landy et al. used the Life-Years From Screening-CT (LYFS-CT) model, despite the fact that life expectancy may limit access for minorities who have shorter life expectancies. Moreover, the initial investigators assumed that LCS would reduce lung cancer mortality by 20% for all racial and ethnic groups, even though previous studies have suggested that minorities may experience greater reductions in lung cancer mortality from LCS.

Ultimately, because LYFS-CT may exclude minority patients who could benefit from LCS and underestimate the benefits of LCS, the authors of this AJR article suggested "augmenting LCS eligibility for minority patients using combinations of models"--specifically, the PLCOm2012 model in conjunction with LYFS-CT and USPSTF-2020.

For more information: www.arrs.org


Related Content

News | Radiopharmaceuticals and Tracers

September 27, 2023 — Blue Earth Diagnostics, a Bracco company and recognized leader in the development and ...

Time September 27, 2023
arrow
News | Radiation Therapy

September 27, 2023 — The American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) announced the three winning research proposals ...

Time September 27, 2023
arrow
News | Mammography

September 26, 2023 — Artificial intelligence(AI) and machine learning tools have received a lot of attention recently ...

Time September 26, 2023
arrow
Feature | ASTRO | By Christine Book

September 26, 2023 — Ahead of the 65th American Society for Radiation Oncology Annual Meeting, ASTRO 2023, ITN’s ...

Time September 26, 2023
arrow
News | Prostate Cancer

September 22, 2023 — According to an accepted manuscript published in the American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR) ...

Time September 22, 2023
arrow
Feature | Radiation Oncology

The radiation oncology community lost a leader this past summer, with the passing of Jay Loeffler, MD, FACR, FASTRO. He ...

Time September 21, 2023
arrow
Feature | Proton Therapy | By Christine Book

An overview of significant developments in proton therapy, over just the past six months, reinforces the pace of ...

Time September 21, 2023
arrow
News | Artificial Intelligence

September 20, 2023 — Medical imaging artificial intelligence (AI) company Annalise.ai has announced that the results ...

Time September 20, 2023
arrow
News | Radiation Therapy

September 20, 2023 — RefleXion Medical, Inc., a therapeutic oncology company and 3B Pharmaceuticals (3BP) GmbH, a ...

Time September 20, 2023
arrow
Sponsored Content | Case Study | Radiology Imaging | By Tim Hodson

In June, the Philips Radiology Experience Tour hit the road to provide healthcare professionals with an opportunity to ...

Time September 19, 2023
arrow
Subscribe Now