MACRA, MIPS, QPP, radiology, impact on radiologists

December 28, 2016 – A new Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute series of reports explores the impact of the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) of 2015, along with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS) 2016 proposal for its implementation, on radiologists. The work, conducted by a team of radiologists and health services researchers, is published online in the Journal of the American College of Radiology (JACR).

Under MACRA, most radiologists will initially be paid through the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), which applies positive or negative adjustments to fee-for-service payments. In April 2016, CMS published an initial proposed rule for MACRA, renaming it the Quality Payment Program (QPP) that will ultimately link a very large fraction of physicians’ Medicare payments to the quality and value of care. Payment adjustments under MACRA will begin in 2019, although they will reflect performance during 2017.

The first part of the JACR series provides an overview of CMS’ proposal for implementing MACRA legislation via the new QPP, paying specific attention to the implications and imperatives for radiologists under MIPS.

“Given that the initial MIPS performance period begins in 2017, radiologists must begin preparing for QPP and taking actions to ensure their future success under this new quality-based payment system,” said Andrew Rosenkrantz, M.D., MPA, the lead study author and a Neiman Institute affiliate research fellow.

In the second part of the series, the researchers found that CMS’ proposed criteria for special considerations in new payment models would result in many radiologists being evaluated using measures not reflective of their practice.

“MIPS will provide special considerations for physicians with a limited degree of face-to-face patient interaction,” said Bibb Allen Jr., M.D., FACR, chair of the Neiman Institute advisory board and past chair of the American College of Radiology Board of Chancellors. “However, using CMS’s proposed criteria for which physicians will receive special considerations, many radiologists will be deemed ineligible for these special considerations and thus be evaluated based on performance categories beyond their control.”

“Alternative criteria could help ensure that radiologists are provided a fair opportunity for success in performance review under MIPS,” added Rosenkrantz.

The ACR applied concepts developed in these articles to inform CMS that determination of special considerations based on face-to-face patient interaction for payment policy purposes may best be defined in terms of the number of Evaluation and Management services performed, while the number of minor procedures performed is not as useful in that determination. 

On Oct. 14, 2016, CMS released its final rule for MACRA implementation. This final rule modified the criteria for special considerations under MIPS, consistent with earlier ACR feedback. As now defined, at minimum, nearly 90 percent of diagnostic radiologists and 40 percent of interventional radiologists will be eligible for the special considerations and these numbers could increase to 99 percent and 87 percent if CMS determines that procedural services will not be included in its determination of patient facing status. The protections provided to radiologists by the latest modifications from CMS are supported by the data demonstrated in the second part of the series.

Rosenkrantz, Allen and their colleagues noted that continued investigation is warranted to optimally determine the extent of radiologists’ face-to-face patient interactions.

The Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute is one of the nation’s leading medical imaging socioeconomic research organizations. The Neiman Institute studies the role and value of radiology and radiologists in evolving health care delivery and payment systems and the impact of medical imaging on the cost, quality, safety and efficiency of health care. 

Read the JACR article “The Proposed MACRA/MIPS Threshold for Patient-Facing Encounters: What It Means for Radiologists.” 

Read the article "HHS Finalizes Bundled Payments for Cardiac, Orthopedic Care."

For more information: www.neimanhpi.org 


Related Content

News | X-Ray

Dec. 1, 2025 – Zwanger-Pesiri Radiology, one of the most respected and technologically advanced outpatient radiology ...

Time December 03, 2025
arrow
News | Interventional Radiology

Dec. 1, 2025 — GE HealthCare has unveiled the Allia Moveo,1 an image guiding solution designed to enhance mobility and ...

Time December 02, 2025
arrow
News | Archive Cloud Storage

Nov. 30, 2025 — Gradient Health, Inc. has released Atlas 2, a major upgrade to its self-service medical imaging data ...

Time December 01, 2025
arrow
News | Artificial Intelligence

Nov. 24, 2025 — Siemens Healthineers is launching artificial intelligence-enabled services to help healthcare providers ...

Time November 24, 2025
arrow
News | Artificial Intelligence

Nov. 20, 2025 — Aidoc has announced a collaboration with AdventHealth to launch one of the largest imaging AI ...

Time November 21, 2025
arrow
News | Radiology Business

Nov. 13, 2025 — Covera Health recently announced that Advanced Radiology Services (ARS) has joined its national Quality ...

Time November 17, 2025
arrow
News | Radiology Business

Nov. 12, 2025 — Siemens has announced plans to deconsolidate its remaining stake in Siemens Healthineers (currently ...

Time November 13, 2025
arrow
Sponsored Content | Videos | Radiology Business

Radiology departments have many different needs and face a wide variety of challenges that can impact their departments ...

Time November 11, 2025
arrow
News | Interventional Radiology

Nov. 10, 2025 — Interventional radiologists (IRs) that almost exclusively practice in their specialty provide more ...

Time November 11, 2025
arrow
News | Orthopedic Imaging

Nov.10, 2025 — Medical imaging technology company Adaptix Ltd. has received 510(k) clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug ...

Time November 11, 2025
arrow
Subscribe Now