News | Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) | October 27, 2020

NRG-BN001 photon IMRT treatment group displays no significant survival difference between arms for patients with glioblastoma, proton treatment group still accruing

Vinai Gondi, M.D., the Director of Research at the Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center, Co-director of the Brain Tumor Center at Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center, Warrenville, and lead author of the NRG-BN001 abstract.

Vinai Gondi, M.D., director of research at the Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center, co-director of the Brain Tumor Center at Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center, Warrenville, and lead author of the NRG-BN001 abstract.

October 27, 2020 — A preliminary analysis of photon therapy treatment group 1 from the phase II NRG Oncology clinical trial NRG-BN001 indicates that there is no statistically significant overall survival (OS) or toxicity differences between dose-intensification radiation therapy (DI-RT) using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and standard-dose radiation therapy (SD-RT) with temozolomide treatments for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). Although there were no differences between arms, results suggest that MGMT methylation and RPA are predictive of progression-free survival (PFS). The proton therapy treatment group 2 of this trial is ongoing. The preliminary results were presented at the virtual edition of the American Society for Radiation Oncology's (ASTRO) Annual Meeting in October 2020.

NRG-BN001 enrolled 229 eligible patients to be randomly assigned to receive either SD-RT or DI-IMRT. Patients were also stratified by RPA class and MGMT methylation status. Of the 229 trial participants, 58% were MGMT unmethylated and 75% were RPA class IV. Researchers were primarily studying OS rates between the two treatments; however, secondary objectives of the trial were to track PFS, treatment-related toxicity between arms, patient-reported symptom burden, and change to neurocognitive function.

Results demonstrated no significant difference in grade 3 or greater toxicity between the SD-RT and DI-IMRT treatments. The median OS rate for DI-IMRT was 18.7 months (95% CI: 16.0, 23.5) and 16.3 months for the SD-RT arm (95% CI: 13.9, 19.8). At 30 months, 30.4% of the patients on the DI-IMRT arm (95% CI: 21.8, 39.1) and 21.6% of the patients on the SD-RT arm (95% CI: 12.7, 30.6) were still living. Median PFS also exhibited no difference (HR=1.23, 95% CI: 0.93, 1.64, p=0.18).

While there was no difference in median OS between treatment arms, median OS was significantly shorter for MGMT unmethylated GBM (15.1 months, 95% CI: 13.9, 17.8) when compared to MGMT methylated GBM (28.3 months, 95% CI: 21.5, 38.3, p<0.001). Additionally, median OS was also shorter for RPA class V (10.8 months, 95% CI 4.9-14.9) when compared to RPA class III (20.5 months, 15.5, 29.8) or IV (18.5 mo, 15.7, 21.5) (p=0.02). Researchers also observed a shorter median PFS in the MGMT methylated cohort after DI-IMRT treatment (8.8 months, 95% CI 6.0, 11.1) when compared to the SD-RT treatment (14.1 months, 95%CI 8.2, 27.7, p=0.04).

"Although this first group of IMRT dose-intensification did not cross significance threshold for further testing in a phase III trial, it is important to note the predictive implications of MGMT methylation and RPA class with regards to progression-free and overall survival. Future research of treatment intensification should continue to account for these factors in this disease," stated Vinai Gondi, M.D., the director of research at the Northwestern Medicine Proton Center, co-director of the Brain Tumor Center at Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center, Warrenville, and lead author of the NRG-BN001 abstract.

The second group of this trial will be surveying DI-RT with proton therapy in place of IMRT. This group continues to accrue patients, and results will be announced at a future time.

"We look forward to the results that come from this study's second group involving dose-intensification using proton therapy. Proton therapy is hypothesized to further improve survival by preventing radiotherapy-related circulating lymphopenia, which has been shown to impact survival in this patient population," Gondi added.

For more information:

Related Content

News | Lung Imaging

June 24, 2022 — Xoran Technologies announced they have begun work on Phase 2 of their mobile lung grant with the goal to ...

Time June 24, 2022
News | Radiation Therapy

June 24, 2022 — Recently, a collaborated research team led by Prof. LI Hai and Hongzhi Wang from Hefei Institutes of ...

Time June 24, 2022
News | Radiation Therapy

June 23, 2022 — RaySearch Laboratories AB announced the release of the latest version of RayCare*, the next generation ...

Time June 23, 2022
News | SIR

June 20, 2022 — SIR Foundation launched a program to enhance the scientific rigor of research into interventional ...

Time June 20, 2022
News | Radiation Therapy

June 17, 2022 — Accuray Incorporated and Limbus AI Inc. announced they are partnering to augment Accuray adaptive ...

Time June 17, 2022
News | Artificial Intelligence

June 14, 2022 — According to ARRS’ American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR), incorporating AI support into clinical ...

Time June 14, 2022
News | Prostate Cancer

June 10, 2022 — GE Healthcare provides cutting-edge molecular imaging solutions that enable and increase access to ...

Time June 10, 2022

Imaging Technology News (ITN) maintains more than 40 comparison charts of product specifications from various vendors ...

Time June 09, 2022
News | Digital Pathology

June 8, 2022 — Proscia, a leader in digital and computational pathology solutions, announced that its Concentriq Dx ...

Time June 08, 2022
News | Image Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT)

June 7, 2022 — Two-year results from the Dysphagia-Aspiration Related Structures (DARS) trial, which is funded by Cancer ...

Time June 07, 2022
Subscribe Now