News | Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) | October 27, 2020

NRG-BN001 photon IMRT treatment group displays no significant survival difference between arms for patients with glioblastoma, proton treatment group still accruing

Vinai Gondi, M.D., the Director of Research at the Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center, Co-director of the Brain Tumor Center at Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center, Warrenville, and lead author of the NRG-BN001 abstract.

Vinai Gondi, M.D., director of research at the Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center, co-director of the Brain Tumor Center at Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center, Warrenville, and lead author of the NRG-BN001 abstract.


October 27, 2020 — A preliminary analysis of photon therapy treatment group 1 from the phase II NRG Oncology clinical trial NRG-BN001 indicates that there is no statistically significant overall survival (OS) or toxicity differences between dose-intensification radiation therapy (DI-RT) using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and standard-dose radiation therapy (SD-RT) with temozolomide treatments for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). Although there were no differences between arms, results suggest that MGMT methylation and RPA are predictive of progression-free survival (PFS). The proton therapy treatment group 2 of this trial is ongoing. The preliminary results were presented at the virtual edition of the American Society for Radiation Oncology's (ASTRO) Annual Meeting in October 2020.

NRG-BN001 enrolled 229 eligible patients to be randomly assigned to receive either SD-RT or DI-IMRT. Patients were also stratified by RPA class and MGMT methylation status. Of the 229 trial participants, 58% were MGMT unmethylated and 75% were RPA class IV. Researchers were primarily studying OS rates between the two treatments; however, secondary objectives of the trial were to track PFS, treatment-related toxicity between arms, patient-reported symptom burden, and change to neurocognitive function.

Results demonstrated no significant difference in grade 3 or greater toxicity between the SD-RT and DI-IMRT treatments. The median OS rate for DI-IMRT was 18.7 months (95% CI: 16.0, 23.5) and 16.3 months for the SD-RT arm (95% CI: 13.9, 19.8). At 30 months, 30.4% of the patients on the DI-IMRT arm (95% CI: 21.8, 39.1) and 21.6% of the patients on the SD-RT arm (95% CI: 12.7, 30.6) were still living. Median PFS also exhibited no difference (HR=1.23, 95% CI: 0.93, 1.64, p=0.18).

While there was no difference in median OS between treatment arms, median OS was significantly shorter for MGMT unmethylated GBM (15.1 months, 95% CI: 13.9, 17.8) when compared to MGMT methylated GBM (28.3 months, 95% CI: 21.5, 38.3, p<0.001). Additionally, median OS was also shorter for RPA class V (10.8 months, 95% CI 4.9-14.9) when compared to RPA class III (20.5 months, 15.5, 29.8) or IV (18.5 mo, 15.7, 21.5) (p=0.02). Researchers also observed a shorter median PFS in the MGMT methylated cohort after DI-IMRT treatment (8.8 months, 95% CI 6.0, 11.1) when compared to the SD-RT treatment (14.1 months, 95%CI 8.2, 27.7, p=0.04).

"Although this first group of IMRT dose-intensification did not cross significance threshold for further testing in a phase III trial, it is important to note the predictive implications of MGMT methylation and RPA class with regards to progression-free and overall survival. Future research of treatment intensification should continue to account for these factors in this disease," stated Vinai Gondi, M.D., the director of research at the Northwestern Medicine Proton Center, co-director of the Brain Tumor Center at Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center, Warrenville, and lead author of the NRG-BN001 abstract.

The second group of this trial will be surveying DI-RT with proton therapy in place of IMRT. This group continues to accrue patients, and results will be announced at a future time.

"We look forward to the results that come from this study's second group involving dose-intensification using proton therapy. Proton therapy is hypothesized to further improve survival by preventing radiotherapy-related circulating lymphopenia, which has been shown to impact survival in this patient population," Gondi added.

For more information: www.nrgoncology.org


Related Content

News | ASTRO

Oct. 5, 2026 — The American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) recognized the recipients of its 2026 Gold Medal ...

Time October 07, 2026
arrow
News | Radiation Therapy

Oct. 1, 2026 — At ASTRO 2026 Elekta highlighted new data showing unprecedented long-term survival outcomes for patients ...

Time October 05, 2026
arrow
News | Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)

Sept. 27, 2026 — Siemens Healthineers recently launched Accela, a radiotherapy solution engineered around NeoArc ...

Time October 01, 2026
arrow
News | ASTRO

Sept. 29, 2026 — The American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) has named Siemens Healthineers the inaugural ...

Time September 29, 2026
arrow
News | Proton Therapy

Sept. 28, 2026 — Penn Medicine and Ion Beam Applications (IBA) have formed Noventra Oncology Alliance, a new joint ...

Time September 28, 2026
arrow
News | ASTRO

Sept. 22, 2026 — Leading experts in radiation therapy from the Abramson Cancer Center (ACC) of the University of ...

Time September 24, 2026
arrow
News | Molecular Imaging

Sept. 22, 2026 — Blue Earth Diagnostics, a part of the Bracco Group, has announced new research examining how precision ...

Time September 23, 2026
arrow
News | ASTRO

Sept.16, 2026 — For appropriately selected patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer, preserving the bladder can be a ...

Time September 17, 2026
arrow
News | Radiology Imaging

Sept. 1, 2026 — Leo Cancer Care and GE HealthCare have announced that the two companies intend to work together on GE ...

Time September 11, 2026
arrow
News | ASTRO

Sept. 9, 2026 — The 2026 American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Annual Meeting, will take place Sept. 26 to 30 ...

Time September 11, 2026
arrow
Subscribe Now