News | Radiology Business | September 18, 2019

Nurse Practitioners, Physician Assistants Rarely Interpret Diagnostic Imaging Studies

Medicare claims data reveal that other than in radiography and fluoroscopy, NPPs still interpret small percentage of all radiology studies, despite increasing their involvement overall

Nurse Practitioners, Physician Assistants Rarely Interpret Diagnostic Imaging Studies

September 18, 2019 — Although Medicare claims data confirm the increasing role of nurse practitioners and physician assistants (NPPs) in imaging-guided procedures across the United States, a recently published article finds NPPs still rarely render diagnostic imaging services compared with the overall number of diagnostic imaging interpretations. When NPPs do render diagnostic imaging services, though, said services are overwhelmingly radiography and fluoroscopy

The article was published ahead of print in the November issue of the American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR).[1]

Whereas considerable state-to-state variation exists in the rates in which NPPs render diagnostic imaging services, the article states, these rates are also uniformly low — likely due, in part, to unique scope-of-practice laws and regulations at the state level. 

“At present,” Emory University researcher Valeria Makeeva noted, “the near-term likelihood of NPPs appropriating substantial market share in diagnostic imaging is very low.” 

Utilizing 1994–2015 Medicare Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary Master Files, Makeeva and colleagues identified all diagnostic imaging services, including those billed by NPPs, and cataloged them by modality and body region. Then, using 2004–2015 Medicare Part B 5% Research Identifiable File Carrier Files, they separately assessed state-level variation in imaging services rendered by NPPs. Total and relative utilization rates were calculated annually.

Nationally, between 1994 and 2015, diagnostic imaging services increased from 339,168 to 420,172 per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries — an increase of 24 percent. During this same period, diagnostic imaging services rendered by NPPs increased 14,711 percent (from 36 to 5,332 per 100,000 beneficiaries), yet still represented a mere 0.01 percent and 1.27 percent of all imaging in 1994 and 2015, respectively. 

Across all years, radiography and fluoroscopy constituted most of the NPP-billed imaging services and remained constant over time (e.g., 94 percent of all services billed in 1994 and 2015), representing only 0.01 percent and 2.1 percent of all Medicare radiography and fluoroscopy services. However, absolute annual service counts for NPP-billed radiography and fluoroscopy services increased from 10,899 to 1,665,929 services between 1994 and 2015 (Fig. 1).


Fig. 1—Year-to-year annual changes in billed Medicare fee-for-service for diagnostic imaging services by nonphysician providers (NPPs) by modality (radiography and fluoroscopy vs other imaging services) from 1994 to 2015.

A. Bar graph compares radiography and fluoroscopy services billed by NPPs with other imaging services billed by NPPs. 

B. Graph compares radiography and fluoroscopy services billed by NPPs with all radiography and fluoroscopy services billed by physicians and all other health care professionals.

Makeeva’s team found that NPP-billed imaging was most common in South Dakota (7,987 services per 100,000 beneficiaries) and Alaska (6,842 services per 100,000 beneficiaries) and was least common in Hawaii (231 services per 100,000 beneficiaries) and Pennsylvania (478 services per 100,000 beneficiaries).

Acknowledging the growth in procedural, evaluation, management and diagnostic services suggests a need for standardized, narrowly focused, highly supervised and imaging-specific training programs for these professionals — such as those that exist for radiologic technologists aspiring to become radiologist assistants. Makeeva also noted, “Our work shows the need for NPP employers to consider formally defining potential NPP roles within radiology services through NPP training programs that comport with NPP scope of practice in their specific states.”

For more information:



1. Makeeva V., Hawkins C.M., Rosenkrantz A.B., et al. Diagnostic Imaging Examinations Interpreted by Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants: A National and State-Level Medicare Claims Analysis. American Journal of Roentgenology, November 2019.


Related Content

News | Artificial Intelligence | September 16, 2020
September 16, 2020 — Konica Minolta Healthcare Americas, Inc.
Change Healthcare announced innovative new artificial intelligence (AI) models, trained by expert physicians, which extract meaningful diagnostic information from text in EHRs. The first application of this technology will be within the InterQual AutoReview solution, which automates medical necessity reviews using real-time data from EHRs.
News | Artificial Intelligence | September 14, 2020
September 14, 2020 — Change Healthcare announced innovative new...
The National Imaging Informatics Course-Radiology (NIIC-RAD) Term 1 will be held online September 28 - October 2, 2020. NIIC-RAD is made possible through a partnership between the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) and the Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine (SIIM)

Getty Images

News | Radiology Education | September 11, 2020
September 11, 2020 — The...
Acquisition accelerates Radiology Partners’ mission to transform radiology, offer unparalleled clinical value and service at scale and further elevate the role of radiologists within the healthcare field

Getty Images

News | Radiology Business | September 10, 2020
September 10, 2020 — Radiology Partners (RP), a leading ra
The world market for artificial intelligence (AI)-based clinical applications for use in medical imaging is set to reach almost $1.5 billion by 2024 despite a slower-than-expected uptake of these products and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Feature | Artificial Intelligence | September 09, 2020 | Sanjay M Parekh, Ph.D.
Change Healthcare Enterprise Imaging and Change Healthcare Cardiology Hemo now available to Vizient’s diverse provider membership at enhanced savings
News | Enterprise Imaging | September 09, 2020
September 9, 2020 — Change Healthcare announced that it has been awarded two multi-year contracts with ...
KA Imaging’s portable dual-energy X-ray detector has received 510(k) clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Reveal enables bone and soft-tissue differentiation without motion artifacts in a single X-ray exposure. In other words, with one shot, the detector simultaneously delivers DR, bone and tissue images.
News | Digital Radiography (DR) | September 08, 2020
September 8, 2020 — KA Imaging’s...
While AJR articles were more frequently unfunded, and Radiology articles were more often funded, citation rate was not different between funded vs. unfunded; moreover, funding was not significantly associated with citations

Note: Except where otherwise indicated, data are number (%) of research articles. aSignificance lost after adjustment for multiple testing using false-positive rate control. bStatistically significant. cApplies to Radiology and European Radiology articles only. Courtesy of American Roentgen Ray Society (ARRS), American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR)

News | Radiology Education | September 04, 2020
September 4, 2020 — According to ARRS' Americ