Global Breast Imaging Device Market Forecast

A new market report focuses on breast imaging devices, paying special attention to their recent emergence

Image courtesy of Eizo

December 17, 2019 — The "Breast Imaging Device Market Size, Outlook and Growth Opportunities, 2019- 2025" report is now available from ResearchAndMarkets.com.

The report includes the latest predictions of the global breast imaging device market along with geography, therapy area and applications. The report specifically focuses on different types of breast imaging devices with special attention to their emergence over the forecast period to 2025.

The research report provides objective measures to tap into future opportunities that will be available over the next six years. It also highlights key areas to watch over the future along with detailed insights into drivers and challenges across different breast imaging device applications and products. The Breast Imaging Device market report aggregates the current market size based on volume and average price data. It also includes a six-year outlook to 2025 based on anticipated growth rates for each sub-segment and industry as a whole.

Global spending on healthcare continues to increase significantly with the aging population, increased access to treatment and ongoing advancements in technology. This provides strong support for market growth in the medium to long term future. While growth will remain steady in the developed markets, Asian and other emerging markets will be key for breast imaging device market growth from 2019 to 2025.

To address the expanding need for advanced breast imaging device products, the report states that companies are rapidly embracing the new market dynamics, primarily focusing on new launches, specifically to suit local and regional demand patterns. Accordingly, detailed discussion about broader implications of key strategies, product launches and other latest breast imaging device market developments are included in the research work.

Scope of the Breast Imaging Device report

This report covers the 2018 market scenario and outlook of Breast Imaging Device to 2025. Market size is computed using different types, applications of Breast Imaging Device across geographies.

1. Breast Imaging Device market size, US$, 2018-2025

2. Breast Imaging Device market drivers

3. Breast Imaging Device market challenges

4. Breast Imaging Device market opportunities

5. Breast Imaging Device market trends

6. Breast Imaging Device market size forecast by type, 2018-2025

7. Breast Imaging Device market size forecast by application, 2018-2025

8. Breast Imaging Device market size forecast by country, 2018-2025

9. Breast Imaging Device market companies and their strategies

10. Financial and Business Profile of leading vendors

11. Breast Imaging Device market news and deals

For more information: www.researchandmarkets.com/r/vsb00c

Related Content

An example of a HeartFlow FFR-CT image showing the blood flow through what looked like a significant blockage on CT angiography alone, actually was not flow-limiting based on computational fluid dynamics. Use of the technology was supposed to reduce the number of diagnostic catheterizations in the FORECAST trial, but the costs of FFR-CT were not offset enough to show cost savings.

An example of a HeartFlow FFR-CT image showing the blood flow through what looked like a significant blockage on CT angiography alone, actually was not flow-limiting based on computational fluid dynamics. Use of the technology was supposed to reduce the number of diagnostic catheterizations in the FORECAST trial, but the costs of FFR-CT were not offset enough to show cost savings.

Feature | CT Angiography (CTA) | October 23, 2020

FFR-CT Did Not Significantly Reduce Costs But Reduced Rates of Invasive Coronary Angiography

October 22, 2020 – In the FORECAST randomized clinical trial, the use of ...

This illustration show the complexity of the data obtained from one single patient with moderate/severe traumatic brain injury. Different imaging approaches and techniques have their own unique sensitivity in assessing different aspects of neuroanatomy and neuropathology. What can be seen on images also changes with time since injury. Data from comprehensive clinical and functional assessments using a range of other tools is also important for evaluating patient outcome. Through data harmonization and large

This illustration show the complexity of the data obtained from one single patient with moderate/severe traumatic brain injury. Different imaging approaches and techniques have their own unique sensitivity in assessing different aspects of neuroanatomy and neuropathology. What can be seen on images also changes with time since injury. Data from comprehensive clinical and functional assessments using a range of other tools is also important for evaluating patient outcome. Through data harmonization and large-scale analyses of data combined across multiple research sites, the ENIGMA Brain Injury will develop and test methods and procedures for making sense of the complexity in this data. Images courtesy of Olsen et al., Brain Imaging and Behavior, 2020

News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) | October 23, 2020

Global MRI Data Offers Hope for Improving Treatment of Brain Injuries

October 23, 2020 — Trau...

Mammography, which is an X-ray picture of the breast, is efficient also for women over the age of 70.

Getty Images

News | Mammography | October 22, 2020

Mammography Screening Also Saves Older Lives

October 22, 2020 — ...

(A) The fMRI hyperscanning environment. The clinician (1) and patient (2) were positioned in two different 3T MRI scanners. An audio-video link enabled online communication between the two scanners (3), and video images were used to extract frame-by-frame facial expression metrics. During simultaneous acquisition of blood oxygen level–dependent (BOLD)–fMRI data, the clinician used a button box (4) to apply electroacupuncture (EA) treatment (real/sham, double-blind) to the patient (5) to alleviate evoked pressure pain to the leg (6; Hokanson cuff inflation). Pain and affect related to the treatment were rated after each trial. (B) Study overview. After an initial behavioral visit, each individual participated in a Clinical-Interaction (hyperscan preceded by a clinical intake) and No-Interaction condition (hyperscan without a preceding intake), in a counterbalanced order, with two different partners. (C) Experimental protocol. Each hyperscan was composed of 12 repeated trials (four verum EA, four sham EA, and four no treatment) in a pseudo-randomized order. After a resting period (far left), both participants were shown a visual cue to indicate whether the next pain stimulus would be treated (green frame) or not treated (red frame) by the clinician. These cues prompted clinicians prepare to either apply or not apply treatment while evoking corresponding anticipation for the patient. Following the anticipation cue, moderately painful pressure pain was applied to the patient’s left leg, while the clinician applied or did not apply treatment, respectively. After another resting period, participants rated pain (patients), vicarious pain (clinicians), and affect (both) using a visual analog scale (VAS).

News | Clinical Trials | October 22, 2020

Dual Brain Imaging Provides Insight Into Neural Basis of Patient-clinician Relationship

October 22, 2020 — The potential impact of the patient-clinician relationship on a patient's response to treatment is

Lesion was originally reported as indeterminate enhancing mass, and outside report recommended biopsy. Classic features of benign hemangioma are shown. Error was attributed to faulty reasoning. A, Axial MR image obtained 5 minutes after contrast agent administration shows peripheral nodular discontinuous enhancement. B, Axial MR image obtained 10 minutes after contrast agent administration shows centripetal progression of enhancement (arrow). C, Axial fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (FIESTA)

Lesion was originally reported as indeterminate enhancing mass, and outside report recommended biopsy. Classic features of benign hemangioma are shown. Error was attributed to faulty reasoning. A, Axial MR image obtained 5 minutes after contrast agent administration shows peripheral nodular discontinuous enhancement. B, Axial MR image obtained 10 minutes after contrast agent administration shows centripetal progression of enhancement (arrow). C, Axial fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (FIESTA) MR image shows lesion is homogeneously hyperintense compared with liver parenchyma. Image courtesy of American Roentgen Ray Society (ARRS), American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR)

News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) | October 21, 2020

Body MRI Reinterpretations Plagued by Discrepancies and Errors

October 21, 2020 — According to an artic...