News | October 04, 2011

Experts Urge FDA to Remove Echo Contrast Box Warnings

Experts Urge FDA to Remove Echo Contrast Box Warnings

October 4, 2011 – The International Contrast Ultrasound Society (ICUS) submitted a petition this week to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requesting removal of the boxed warnings on ultrasound contrast agents. The members of the group say this would bring the product labeling into line with the current body of scientific research, which it says clearly demonstrates the safety and clinical benefits of these imaging products.

ICUS members are concerned that current boxed warnings may unduly deter the use of an exceedingly safe, reliable, non-invasive and cost-effective diagnostic imaging tool that does not expose patients to ionizing radiation. Given the potential life-saving benefits of ultrasound contrast agents and the potential risks associated with their non-use, ICUS believes the warnings are inconsistent with the standards of the FDA for use of boxed warnings. ICUS said at the time the FDA required the boxed warnings, there may have been insufficient data to support clinicians’ positive experience with ultrasound contrast agents. They added that the FDA’s decision to add boxed warnings was, at that time, consistent with its regulatory authority and guidance.

However, ICUS contends the threshold criteria used by the FDA to determine whether a particular medication should be assigned a box warning clearly no longer apply to echo ultrasound contrast agents. When assessing the risks and benefits, ICUS said the adverse reaction rate is not serious enough in proportion to the potential benefit of the drug.

The group said ultrasound contrast agents should be encouraged for a number of important reasons, including their safety, improvement to diagnostic accuracy, their use encourages reduced exposure to ionizing radiation, and they reduce overall healthcare cost. ICUS said the boxed warnings deter use of ultrasound contrast agents, especially in critically ill patients who have the most to gain from a more reliable diagnosis and expeditiously administered therapies.

The safety of ultrasound contrast agents has been extensively studied since the FDA decision to require boxed warnings on the product labels. In addition to six safety studies undertaken by the product sponsors, numerous independent investigator-initiated scientific studies have now been published in peer-reviewed medical and scientific journals, showing no increased safety signal even among the sickest patients. ICUS contends these studies show ultrasound contrast agents are not associated with increased risk of death, myocardial infarction or other morbidities. The group said the studies also show the agents are safe in patients with pulmonary hypertension, acute myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure, in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit, and in patients undergoing stress testing.

By way of example, a recent meta-analyses of these studies showed the risk of death for contrast echocardiography was 0.34 percent (726 out of 211,162 patients) versus 0.9 percent in patients undergoing unenhanced echocardiography (45 out of 5 million patients).                 

In studying more than 4.3 million patients, it was found that those receiving a contrast agent were actually 24 percent less likely to die within 24 hours than patients who did not receive a contrast agent during an ultrasound diagnostic examination, ICUS wrote in its petition.

Similarly, the American Society of Echocardiography Multi-Center Registry of thirteen sites and more than 66,000 doses showed (a) no deaths, (b) no serious adverse events in hospitalized patients, (c) severe adverse reactions in eight non-hospitalized patients (0.01 percent), and (d) anaphylactoid reactions (severe allergic reactions) in four patients (0.006 percent). The authors of the study concluded the incidence of severe adverse reactions to ultrasound contrast agents is lower than, or similar to, that reported for contrast agents commonly used in other cardiac imaging tests. Further, a meta-analysis of eight controlled observational registry studies, with nearly a quarter million patients, concluded: “the cumulative evidence has suggested that the use of contrast agents for echocardiography is safe." In fact, the meta-analysis actually showed lower mortality rates in patients who received ultrasound contrast recipients. According to the senior author, "we did not see any signal that echo contrast was causing any harm."

ICUS said, as with any medical procedure or device, ultrasound contrast agents do carry some associated risks. The most serious is the potential for an anaphylactoid reaction. However, studies have shown that the risk of an anaphylactic reaction from an ultrasound contrast agent is comparable to that of non-ultrasound contrast agents — approximately 1 in 10,000 events. In addition, according to the data from the American Society of Echocardiography Multi-Center Registry, the incidence of severe adverse reactions to ultrasound contrast agents is lower than, or similar to, that reported for contrast agents commonly used for other cardiac imaging. ICUS said these studies have shown that the majority (65 percent) of patients who experienced an adverse event had a history of allergy.

For more information:  www.icus-society.org 

Related Content

Warm Springs Health & Wellness Center Implements Digisonics Solution for OB Ultrasound
News | Ultrasound Women's Health | June 17, 2019
Warm Springs Health & Wellness Center in Warm Springs, Ore., has selected the Digisonics OB PACS (picture archiving...
Konica Minolta Healthcare Announces Autologous Biologics Workshop in Partnership With EmCyte Corp.
News | Ultrasound Imaging | June 12, 2019
Konica Minolta Healthcare announced a new autologous biologics workshop in partnership with EmCyte Corp. The workshop...
Civco Launches Envision Ultrasound Viral Barriers
Technology | Ultrasound Imaging | June 06, 2019
Civco Medical Solutions announced a new solution that removes gel from ultrasound procedures. Envision viral barriers...
Quantitative Transmission Ultrasound Featured at Acoustical Society of America

Fused QT Ultrasound 3-D quantitative transmission ultrasound and compounded reflection axial images showing high resolution image of internal organs, tissue, skin and hair of neo-natal piglet. Anatomy courtesy of C. Ruoff, DVM.

News | Ultrasound Imaging | May 29, 2019
May 29, 2019 — QT Ultrasound recently showcased its advanced...
Improved Imaging for Prostate Cancer Could Lead to More Effective Treatment

The picture shows that time series signal is extracted from a series of ultrasound frames for classification. Each patch across a number of frames inside the prostate is classified into either cancerous or normal tissue. The image at the lower right corner shows the overall result for those frames. Image courtesy of Pingkun Yan and researchers from NIH, University of British Columbia and Queens University.

News | Ultrasound Imaging | May 28, 2019
Engineers at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute are working to improve imaging methods in order to make medicine more...
Philips Lumify Earns U.S. Army Airworthiness Certification
News | Ultrasound Imaging | May 22, 2019
Philips announced that Philips Lumify, a point-of-care ultrasound device, has earned the U.S. Army Airworthiness...
Clarius Releases Clarius Live Ultrasound Telemedicine Solution
Technology | Ultrasound Imaging | May 15, 2019
Clarius Mobile Health released a telemedicine solution called Clarius Live. The simple-to-use feature allows any...
Ultrasonic Device Safe and Effective for Lung Vessel Sealing in Minimally Invasive Lobectomy
News | Interventional Radiology | May 06, 2019
According to a new study, an ultrasonic vessel-sealing device can improve patient outcomes by reducing the incidence of...
Hong Kong Polytechnic University Develops Palm-sized 3-D Scoliosis Ultrasound Imaging System
News | Ultrasound Imaging | May 03, 2019
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (PolyU) announced the development of a palm-sized 3-D ultrasound imaging system...
New Guideline Published for Evaluation of Valvular Regurgitation After Catheter-based Valve Interventions
News | Cardiovascular Ultrasound | April 30, 2019
A new document compiled by four cardiac imaging professional societies provides a resource to guide clinicians in best...