February 5, 2009 - Reporting of radiation therapy details in randomized controlled trials for Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is deficient due to a lack of reporting of key radiation therapy descriptors and quality assurance processes designed to ensure the accuracy and reproducibility of treatment regimens, according to a Feb. 1 study in the International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics.

Randomized controlled trial reports are the primary source of trial documentation that is available to clinicians and patients, and complete descriptions of the therapies used are necessary for proper interpretation and replication of the trials.

In 1996, the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement was developed to ensure that future readers of a trial report were able to draw informed conclusions about the accuracy and validity of trials. However, there has been little research on how oncology trials are reported.

As a result, researchers from the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Department of Radiation Oncology in New York sought to determine the quality of radiation therapy reporting in randomized controlled trials involving Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

The study authors reviewed 61 trial reports that were published between 1998 and 2007 and assessed them for the presence of six quality measures: target volume, radiation dose, fractionation, radiation prescription, quality assurance process use and adherence to quality assurance.

Only one-third of the reports described radiation target volume, only 20 percent described using a quality assurance process and 11 percent described adherence to quality assurance.

"Inadequate reporting of radiation therapy details was found regardless of disease stage, cooperative group sponsorship, journal of publication or country of origin," Justin E. Bekelman, M.D., lead author of the study who is now an assistant professor of radiation oncology at the University of Pennsylvania, said.

The study authors also suggested that consensus standards for radiation therapy reporting should be developed and integrated into the peer-review process.

For more information: www.rtanswers.org


Related Content

News | Interventional Radiology

Nov. 12, 2025 — On Nov. 11, Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah (the U) opened its first specialized ...

Time November 13, 2025
arrow
News | Radiology Business

Nov. 12, 2025 — Siemens has announced plans to deconsolidate its remaining stake in Siemens Healthineers (currently ...

Time November 13, 2025
arrow
News | Radiopharmaceuticals and Tracers

Nov. 11, 2025 — The Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) has released a position paper outlining ...

Time November 12, 2025
arrow
News | Prostate Cancer

Nov. 10, 2025 — Researchers at Wayne State University and the Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute have developed a ...

Time November 11, 2025
arrow
News | Lung Imaging

Nov. 3, 2025 — RevealDx, a leader in the characterization of lung nodules, has introduced MDR Certification of RevealAI ...

Time November 07, 2025
arrow
News | Artificial Intelligence

Nov. 6, 2025 — Lunit, a provider of AI for cancer diagnostics and precision oncology, recently announced that Volpara ...

Time November 07, 2025
arrow
News | Women's Health

Nov. 3, 2025 — —A new radioimmunotherapy approach has the potential to cure human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ...

Time November 04, 2025
arrow
Feature | Kyle Hardner

Radiotherapy contributes to about 40% of all cancer cures but still lags behind systemic therapy in funding and ...

Time October 21, 2025
arrow
News | Prostate Cancer

Sept. 30, 2025 – EDAP TMS's non-invasive, nonsurgical treatment option, Focal One Robotic HIFU, was featured on national ...

Time September 30, 2025
arrow
News | Radiation Therapy

Sept. 25, 2025 — GE HealthCare has announced updates to Intelligent Radiation Therapy (iRT), a new version of the ...

Time September 25, 2025
arrow
Subscribe Now