Greg Freiherr, Industry Consultant

Greg Freiherr has reported on developments in radiology since 1983. He runs the consulting service, The Freiherr Group.

Blog | Greg Freiherr, Industry Consultant | Information Technology | September 28, 2016

Will Smartphones Bring Virtual Reality To Radiology?

virtual reality

Graphic courtesy of Pixabay

If we are to look forward to the development of smartphone technology for radiology applications, we might do well to look at virtual and augmented realities. For decades, radiology has fiddled with these.

The bromance began in the 1980s. It was an infatuation with rudimentary 3-D that progressed a decade later to “data gloves” whose wired sensors translated hand movements into virtual grips, turns and twists of objects.

At an RSNA that now seems a long, long time ago, I (along with many others) was invited into a radiological “CAVE” (CAVE Automatic Virtual Environment) in which I donned a helmet to see the simulated insides of a virtual patient. Those early attempts were updated last year at RSNA when a researcher asserted that smartphone technology could bring VR to mainstream radiology.

A lightweight mobile VR system powered by a high-tech smartphone with an ultra-high-density display can present computed tomography (CT) images stably and at diagnostic quality, according to Vasileios Moustakas, M.D., a radiologist at Evangelismos Hospital in Athens, Greece. Moustakas compared the view with the head-mounted display to being surrounded by a 175-inch mega screen.

 

Next Stop For Smartphones

Smartphones are advancing rapidly into consumer virtual space. Leading the way are Samsung with its Galaxy smartphones complemented by Oculus Rift (Gear VR) technology, and Google, which has sold millions of its Google Cardboard backed by rapidly multiplying apps that can be downloaded on Google Play. These are being followed by efforts within the gaming industry, namely Morpheus from Sony for its PlayStation and Vive from HTC and Valve.

Smartphone technology has taken the early lead in radiology. Moustakas described the ease with which a smartphone system could be applied to the interpretation of images. “Once the files are downloaded it takes less than a minute to wear the VR device and start viewing the CT images,” he said, noting that CT was chosen because the modality is heavily used in emergency departments. “The fact that it’s also mobile is crucial, because this technique can be used for remote diagnosis, avoiding the limitations of the relatively small displays of normal mobile devices.”

A consultant radiologist in the hospital and another radiologist using the VR system remotely reviewed images from 271 CT exams. Their assessments agreed in 97 percent of the cases. “Mobile virtual reality can make it easier for radiologists who want to have access to their examinations, even when they are on the move and away from their workstation,” Moustakas said.

 

Dangers Of Overexuberance

His enthusiasm for the technology, notably, is based on a VR prototype. And getting too excited can lead to disappointment. An example of how high-flying expectations can slow the acceptance of an advanced technology happened in the early 1980s. The capabilities of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were highly touted in the run-up to the commercial release of the first DSA products. The result was disappointment — and slower adoption of DSA than might otherwise have happened.

If smartphone applications raise expectations too much, might their shortcomings create a diminished perception of the potential of virtual reality in medical imaging?

How VR plays out in radiology may depend on whether smartphones or a more sophisticated core technology leads the radiological charge into the virtual world. A company called Technical Illusions has proven the feasibility of projecting 2-D MR images in three dimensions using augmented reality technology, called castAR, a capability demonstrated in a 35-second clip on YouTube.

The radiological application is just one of many being studied at castAR, which grew from R&D aimed in 2011 at gaming and entertainment. The company today has since broadened its focus to include tech and business but maintains the ambitious goal of making “mixed reality a reality for everyone.”

So which will be widely available first? Will smartphone VR follow more sophisticated systems in much the same way as smartphone displays followed PACS? Or will smartphone-based systems be introduced first?

And, if the latter happens, will limited capabilities define how VR is considered by mainstream radiology? Or will virtual reality using smartphones come with disclaimers, implicit or otherwise, that will keep expectations in check, thus allowing the technology to whet the appetite for more powerful virtual visualization?

They are questions without answers. For now.

Editor's note: This is the fourth blog in a four-part series on smartphones and radiology. The first blog, “How Smartphones Can Make Radiologists Even Smarter,” can be found here. The second blog, “Call Me: How Cell Phones Can Make A Difference in Radiology,” can be found here. The third blog, "Sonographic Smartphones: When Will the Potential Be Met?," can be found here.

 

Related Content

Lung and respiratory health pioneer paves way for more precise care of complex respiratory conditions
News | Artificial Intelligence | September 25, 2020
September 25, 2020 — VIDA Diagnostics, Inc. announced that it has received 510(k) clearance from the Food and Drug Ad
EchoGo Pro automates cardiac ultrasound measurements for heart functions, but also empower physicians to predict the occurrence of coronary artery disease (CAD).

EchoGo Pro automates cardiac ultrasound measurements for heart functions, but also empower physicians to predict the occurrence of coronary artery disease (CAD).

News | Cardiovascular Ultrasound | September 25, 2020
September 25, 2020 — Based on its recent analysis of the global...
Of all the buzzwords one would have guessed would dominate 2020, few expected it to be “virtual”. We have been virtualizing various aspects of our lives for many years, but the circumstances of this one has moved almost all of our lives into the virtual realm.

Getty Images

Feature | Radiology Education | September 18, 2020 | By Jef Williams
Of all the buzzwords one would have guessed would dominate 2020, few expected it to be “virtual”.
As the silos of data and diagnostic imaging PACS systems are being collapsed and secured, the modular enterprise imaging platform approach is gaining significance, offering systemness and security
Feature | Coronavirus (COVID-19) | September 18, 2020 | By Anjum M. Ahmed, M.D., MBBS, MBA, MIS
COVID-19 is now everywhere, and these are the lo
Cloud and cloud-native architecture is the future for computing solutions in EI applications

Getty Images

Feature | Enterprise Imaging | September 18, 2020 | By Henri “Rik” Premo
With over five years of presence in the rapidly expanding...
Ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release quickly improves hand function and reduces hand discomfort, making the procedure a safe, effective, and less invasive alternative to traditional open or endoscopic surgery

Patients answered three questionnaires (Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand [QDASH] and two parts of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire: symptom severity [BCTSQ-SS] and functional status [BCTSQ-FS] scales) assessing the affected wrist's function and discomfort immediately pre-procedure, 2 weeks post-procedure, and at least one year post-procedure. Infographic courtesy of the American Roentgen Ray Society (ARRS), American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR)

News | Ultrasound Imaging | September 17, 2020
September 17, 2020 — According to ARRS' American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR),...
News | Artificial Intelligence | September 16, 2020
September 16, 2020 — Konica Minolta Healthcare Americas, Inc.
Feature | Coronavirus (COVID-19) | September 15, 2020
September 15, 2020 — The world is facing a global pandemic with unknown implications, but it is now well known ...
Videos | Coronavirus (COVID-19) | September 15, 2020
Case is a 6-month-old infant boy admitted to hospital due to respiratory distress then worsened by a pericardial effu