News | Proton Therapy | July 17, 2017

ASTRO Updates Insurance Coverage Recommendations for Proton Therapy

Proton beam therapy model policy recommends expanded access to advanced radiation therapy treatment for cancer patients

ASTRO Updates Insurance Coverage Recommendations for Proton Therapy

July 17, 2017 — The American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) has issued an update to its recommendations for medical insurance coverage regarding the use of proton beam therapy to treat cancer. The updated Proton Beam Therapy Model Policy provides guidance to payers on clinical indications that are appropriate for treatment with proton therapy and should be covered by health insurance, including Medicare, Medicaid and private insurance.

Proton beam therapy is an advanced type of external-beam radiation therapy that uses proton rather than photon beams to deliver radiation doses to a tumor. Proton therapy offers a high degree of precision, which allows radiation oncologists to target an escalated dose of radiation directly on a tumor and spare nearby healthy tissue. Proton therapy is particularly beneficial for patients with tumors that are near critical structures, such as lung tumors near the heart.

Based on new evidence published since the original policy was issued in 2014, the updated model policy outlines two categories of appropriate clinical indications, or diagnoses, for proton beam therapy. For indications in Group 1, coverage is recommended; for Group 2, coverage is recommended if additional requirements (outlined below) are met. Disease sites were assigned to one of the two categories based on evidence in published clinical data and current Medicare coverage.

Group 1 indications, or the clinical scenarios that frequently support the use of proton therapy based on medical necessity and published clinical data, were updated with five additions and one modification. Group 1 indications, with additions marked by asterisks, include:

  • Malignant and benign primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors*;
  • Advanced (e.g., T4) and/or unresectable head and neck cancers*;
  • Cancers of the paranasal sinuses and other accessory sinuses*;
  • Nonmetastatic retroperitoneal sarcomas*;
  • Re-irradiation cases where cumulative critical structure dose would exceed tolerance dose*;
  • Hepatocellular cancer (no longer required to be treated in a hypofractionated regimen*);
  • Ocular tumors, including intraocular melanomas;
  • Tumors that approach or are located at the base of skull, including but not limited to chordoma and chondrosarcomas;
  • Primary or metastatic tumors of the spine where the spinal cord tolerance may be exceeded with conventional treatment or where the spinal cord has previously been irradiated;
  • Primary or benign solid tumors in children treated with curative intent and occasional palliative treatment of childhood tumors when one of the criteria noted above apply; and
  • Patients with genetic syndromes making total volume of radiation minimization crucial, such as but not limited to NF-1 patients and retinoblastoma patients.

The policy recommends coverage for Group 2 indications if the patient is enrolled in either an Institutional Research Board (IRB)-approved study or in a multi-institutional registry adhering to Medicare requirements for Coverage with Evidence Development (CED). These indications also represent the disease sites for which evidence is accumulating and may support future Group 1 coverage. While the policy specifies that no indications are deemed inappropriate for CED, it also specifies several systems for Group 2 indications:

  • Non-T4 and resectable head and neck cancers (previously all head and neck malignancies*);
  • Nonmetastatic prostate cancer (previously grouped with genitourinary carcinomas*);
  • Breast cancer*;
  • Thoracic malignancies, including nonmetastatic primary lung and esophageal cancers;
  • Abdominal malignancies, including nonmetastatic primary pancreatic, biliary and adrenal cancers; and
  • Pelvic malignancies, including nonmetastatic rectal, anal, bladder and cervical cancers.

“Recent research has expanded our understanding of the types of malignancies and clinical scenarios where proton beam therapy is most advantageous. This policy update reflects the most current knowledge regarding which patients will benefit from — and therefore should have access to — this cutting-edge treatment,” said ASTRO Chair David C. Beyer, M.D., FASTRO. “We also remain firmly committed to developing evidence to identify new areas where this technology might be beneficial as well as situations where it is not needed.”

The model policy update was developed by ASTRO’s Payer Relations Subcommittee, reviewed by the Health Policy Council and then approved by the Board of Directors in June 2017. Model policies differ from practice guidelines, which are written for physicians and outline recommendations to optimize clinical care. ASTRO also provides model policies for brachytherapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

For more information: www.astro.org

Related Content

Senate Opens Debate on Better Care Reconciliation Act
News | Business | July 26, 2017
The U.S. Senate voted Monday, with a tiebreaking vote from Vice President Mike Pence, to begin debate on the Better...
Radiotherapy Prior to Surgery Reduces Secondary Tumor Risk in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients
News | Radiation Therapy | July 24, 2017
Moffitt Cancer Center researchers launched a first-of-its-kind study comparing the long-term benefits of radiation...
X-ray performed on a GE Optima 646 DR system. The FDA has updated its radiology reporting forms on its website.
News | Business | July 24, 2017
July 24, 2017 — The U.S.
El Camino Hospital to Offer Calypso 4-D Localization System
News | Radiation Therapy | July 21, 2017
El Camino Hospital (Mountain View, Calif.) announced the installation of a new Calypso 4-D Localization System and will...
Eight Proton Therapy Centers Worldwide Adopt RayStation for Treatment Planning
News | Treatment Planning | July 21, 2017
RaySearch Laboratories reported that eight additional proton therapy centers worldwide have recently chosen RayStation...
Radiologists Seek Greater Involvement in Patient Care
News | Patient Engagement | July 20, 2017
Despite time and workload constraints, radiologists are looking for ways to become more directly involved in the care...
Electronic Brachytherapy Comparable to Mohs Surgery in Early-Stage Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer Treatment
News | Brachytherapy Systems | July 20, 2017
July 20, 2017 — Rates of recurrence in early-stage non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) patients were virtually identical
ACR Updates Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics Guidance With ASTRO and AAPM
News | Radiation Dose Management | July 19, 2017
July 19, 2017 — The American College of Radiology (ACR) recently collaborated with professional medical societies to
News | Radiation Therapy | July 19, 2017
July 19, 2017 — The members of the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) have elected three new officers to
Overlay Init