Feature | February 03, 2014 | Raissa Rocha

An Update on Breast Density and Cancer Screening

The dense breast discussion continues, with many factors to consider for breast imaging

dense breasts

The practice of breast imaging and screening in women at risk for breast cancer is evolving as new imaging modalities are incorporated and researchers continue to study the implications of dense breast tissue in patients. At the 2013 annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Chicago, there were several sessions highlighting trials and studies that brought breast density and cancer detection to the forefront.

Understanding Breast Density

It has been established that dense breast tissue is associated with a higher rate of missed cancers, particularly early-stage cancers, due to the similarities in appearance on mammograms. Women with dense tissue are also said to have an elevated risk of developing cancer in the breast. In a special interest session at RSNA 2013, presenters reported on research that examined breast density and the risks for breast cancer it may pose to patients.1

According to presenter Jennifer A. Harvey, M.D., FACR, professor of radiology at University of Virginia, dense breast tissue can be common among women, but not all occurrences of dense breast tissue link directly to a high risk for cancer. Rather, the elevated risk potentially can vary by age, race, geography and other factors such as eating and smoking habits. With assessment of breast density and the risk for breast cancer becoming an international area for study, it is important for all parties involved to understand the relationship between density and cancer, said Harvey.

In the session, Harvey reported on collaborative research performed throughout the years that continues to dive into the subject of breast density. Mammographic studies, dating from the 1980s and performed around the United States and other countries, were assessed for breast density and cancer incidence. Some of the findings revealed the varied nature of breast density: It is known that breast density declines with age, but the risk for cancer does not necessarily correlate with the decrease and may remain the same throughout a woman’s lifespan. And while dense breast tissue is known to mask cancers on mammograms, breast density did not translate directly to higher risks of cancer for all women. For example, Asian women were found to have denser breasts but reported fewer cancer incidences, said Harvey.

Measuring Breast Density

Part of the mission to understand breast density is the drive to measure and monitor it. Martin Yaffe, Ph.D., professor of medical biophysics at the University of Toronto, spoke on methods of deriving breast density from a variety of imaging modalities, including mammography, digital tomosynthesis and ultrasound. In order to improve screening practices, providers should identify strategies for proper screening of both women with dense breast tissue and women with fatty breast tissue, Yaffe said. Two-dimensional assessment of breast density is more commonly performed with traditional mammography, but 3-D volumetric analysis is believed to offer a more accurate look at density. The focus in the radiology community now, said Yaffe, is to develop a new predictive model of which patients at high risk are more likely to have breast cancer.

Mammography is known to have lower sensitivity for high-risk patients because dense breast tissue can be mistaken for cancers on mammograms. Supplemental imaging is often recommended for those patients in need of further analysis. Identifying cancers at earlier stages improves patient outcomes, but for women with dense breasts, cancers are often not found until later when they are more metastatic. 

“No one is talking about replacing mammography at this time,” said Wendie Berg, M.D., Ph.D., FACR, professor of radiology at the University of Pittsburgh. But often the question becomes not whether to perform supplementing imaging, but which imaging modality to pursue for further screening.

In addition to traditional mammography, clinicians have the option of using contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM), ultrasound (such as automated breast ultrasound or ABUS), digital tomosynthesis, molecular breast imaging (MBI), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT), among others, for imaging the breast. Some offer a more detailed look at irregular-shaped masses in the breast while other modalities provide more ease and comfort for patients. A recent KLAS brief, “3 Things You Need to Know About Breast Imaging,” reported that while mammography remains first in line for breast cancer screening, ultrasound and tomosynthesis are making strides, with 90 percent of providers surveyed indicating that they rely on ultrasound for breast imaging after mammography. The brief also reported that 87 percent of providers stated they had a positive ROI when using tomosynthesis products, even without receiving reimbursements.

One technique offered during RSNA 2013 as a possible option for assessment of density is a noninvasive optical tool developed for breast imaging. “Non-invasive Optical Assessment of Breast Density and Identification of High-risk Subjects,”2 presented by Paola Taroni, Ph.D., professor of physics at Politecnico di Milano in Milan, Italy, revealed that the optical mammography tool can provide functional and structural information on breast tissue through noninvasive means and with no ionizing radiation. Researchers in the Milan study compared women already identified from mammographic studies as BI-RADS categories 1 to 3 and as category 4. The team observed craniocaudal and oblique views of both breasts using multi-wavelength optical mammography, and found that amounts of water and collagen content observed optically increased by BI-RADS category. The observations were consistent with known differences in composition and microscopic structure between dense and fatty tissue, according to Taroni. She concluded that optical estimation of breast density is feasible enough for clinical practice and could provide effective assessment of breast density to complement other imaging modalities in screening practices.

Getting Patients to Understand

Breast density “inform” legislation efforts continues to grow in the United States, with many states working on bills and others already enacting laws to require providers to send breast density notification letters to patients. But sometimes, there is little written about what to do when letters are sent and patients are faced with the information that their dense breasts leave them at higher risk for cancer.

The subject of dense breast patients choosing to pursue supplemental imaging was highlighted at RSNA 2013 during the session “Patient Awareness of Breast Density and Interest in Supplemental Screening Tests for Women With Dense Breasts Among Women at a County Hospital Compared to Women at an Outpatient Radiology Clinic of an Academic Medical Center,”3 where presenters reported on a study that compared women who obtained mammograms in different geographic and hospital settings. In that study, a survey was given to 153 women at a county hospital before their screening appointments, asking whether they were aware of the breast density topic and whether they were interested or willing to pay for additional tests (such as ultrasound or CESM) if they had dense breasts. A similar survey was also conducted at an outpatient radiology clinic at an academic medical center. The study found that women who obtained screening at the county hospital were interested in their breast density, but less willing to incur expenses for additional imaging than women at the outpatient clinic.

“Patient awareness is worse in county hospital settings,” concluded Long Trinh, M.D., currently at Stanford University in Stanford, Calif. “We found that a majority of women were not willing or able to do supplementary imaging.” This is often explained by the fact that women who visit county hospitals for routine mammograms typically do not pursue more care than what is covered under insurance. Women from more rural backgrounds also face longer travel times if they choose to undergo supplemental imaging tests, said Trinh. The disparity shows that if breast density notification and supplemental imaging are to be successful, providers and insurance companies need to ensure that the correct information is communicated and that patients in need of additional screening can afford it.  

References

1. Berg W M.D., Ph.D., Harvey J M.D., Yaffe M Ph.D, Smith, R Ph.D,
“Special Interest Session: Breast Density: Risk Assessment,
Communication, and Approaches to Supplemental Imaging,” session presented at RSNA 2013.

2. Taroni, P Ph.D., “Non-invasive Optical Assessment of Breast Density and Identification of High-risk Subjects,” session presented at RSNA 2013.

3. Trinh L M.D. et al, “Patient Awareness of Breast Density and Interest in Supplemental Screening Tests for Women with Dense Breasts among Women at a County Hospital Compared to Women at an Outpatient Radiology Clinic of an Academic Medical Center,” session presented at RSNA 2013.

Related Content

Comparison of Screening Recommendations Supports Annual Mammography
News | Mammography | August 22, 2017
When to initiate screening for breast cancer, how often to screen, and how long to screen are questions that continue...
Clinical Data Supports Use of Xoft System for Endometrial Cancer
News | Brachytherapy Systems | August 03, 2017
Researchers presented clinical data supporting use of the Xoft Axxent Electronic Brachytherapy (eBx) System for the...
The ASPIRE Cristalle FFDM system with DBT combines Fujifilm’s state-of-the-art hexagonal close pattern (HCP) detector design, advanced image processing and image acquisition workflow
News | Women's Health | August 01, 2017
Fujifilm Medical Systems U.S.A., Inc. announced that The Mammography Center of Monterey, an ACR-accredited breast...
Sponsored Content | Videos | Breast Imaging | July 28, 2017
Nancy Cappello, Ph.D., executive director and founder of Are You Dense Inc. and Are You Dense Advocacy, explains how
Radiotherapy Prior to Surgery Reduces Secondary Tumor Risk in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients
News | Radiation Therapy | July 24, 2017
Moffitt Cancer Center researchers launched a first-of-its-kind study comparing the long-term benefits of radiation...
Kubtec Launches New Website For Digital Imaging and Irradiation Products
News | Digital Radiography (DR) | July 20, 2017
Kubtec announced the launch a new website focused on the applications of digital X-ray imaging and irradiation for...
Volpara Solutions to Showcase Volpara Enterprise DDP Software at AHRA 2017
News | Mammography | July 11, 2017
Volpara Solutions Inc. will showcase its new Volpara Enterprise DDP software at the Association for Medical Imaging...
Fujifilm Showcases Digital Radiography, Mammography Innovations at AHRA 2017
News | Digital Radiography (DR) | July 06, 2017
Fujifilm Medical Systems U.S.A. Inc. will present its comprehensive portfolio of digital radiography (DR) and...
Feature | Breast Density | July 05, 2017 | By Nancy M. Cappello, Ph.D.
Two decades of research on the masking risk of dense breast tissue by mammography screening is indisputable. As the...
Solis Mammography Ranks No. 19 in Dallas Business Journal’s Middle Market 50
News | Mammography | June 30, 2017
June 30, 2017 — Solis Mammography was named the 19th fastest-growing, middle-market company in North Texas by the
Overlay Init