Feature | February 01, 2012

Replacing Your PACS

On average, PACS systems are being replaced every five to seven years. When a facility must choose a new system, there are many factors to take into consideration.

During the recent Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) annual meeting at Chicago, Imaging Technology News editors polled several PACS vendors about what they consider to be key factors. Following is a recap of their thoughts:

Data migration — How the data will be moved into the new system is a top consideration mentioned by all. As noted by Deborah Reed, marketing manager for Infinitt North America, “You have to think about all that old data, which often is in several different archives, different media and different systems.”

Think beyond the radiology department — George Kovacs, director of product marketing for McKesson’s medical imaging group, said traditional departments are realizing that the PACS is not just a system for the radiology department any more. Kovacs uses a new descriptive term, “enterprise image repository,” which should have easy access from any application that needs it.

Sectra’s director of product marketing, Mats Bjornemo, also pointed out the importance of support outside of the radiology department and integration into clinical pathways. “There needs to be support for referring physicians outside the department,” he said, “and flexibility for sharing images across department boundaries and facilities.”

Interoperability — Both Kovacs and Bjornemo said a PACS system should integrate with other vendors’ systems.

Business continuity — This includes issues like disaster recovery and data lifecycle management. “How long should a study be saved?” Kovacs said. “There are legal requirements, potential use in future research, etc. And this needs to be balanced against storage capacity.”
“Today we have to handle images with huge datasets, with hybrid images especially,” said Bjornemo. “You have to make sure they will not choke your system.”

Training — What will the transition process be? How will training be done? These are other important questions to ask of a PACS vendor.

Cost — The bottom line is always important, but the scenario is a little different when it comes to replacing an old PACS system, Reed said. “We used to be talking about a PACS system versus film, and it was easy to prove the cost benefits and return on investment. But today, when it’s a new PACS system compared to an old one, it is not as easy to show cost savings.

“We know that some old PACS systems aren’t performing up to par and there are integration issues,” she added. “But it’s harder to quantify cost benefits of PACS versus PACS, and this may keep some facilities from changing.”

The cost of service agreements also comes into play when replacing a PACS, said Steve Deaton, Viztek’s vice president of sales. He also advises companies to make sure that the system they buy is as rich in features as possible. “They probably have spent the last ‘x’ amount of years using an old product. Sometimes they see something and think, ‘Oh, this is better. Let’s go here.’ But there are a lot of PACS companies and only a few are floating to the top and provide a nice feature set in an easy-to-use package.”

Related Content

Enterprise Imaging Growing Its Share of Imaging IT Market
Feature | Enterprise Imaging | August 18, 2017
August 16, 2017 — A new imaging information technology (IT) market report from Signify Research suggests...
MaineHealth Selects eUnity Platform for Clinical and Diagnostic Viewing
News | Enterprise Imaging | August 17, 2017
August 17, 2017 — Client Outlook recently announced that MaineHealth has selected eUnity as its...
Houston Methodist Hospital Enters Multi-Year Technology and Research Agreement With Siemens Healthineers
News | Imaging | August 17, 2017
Houston Methodist Hospital and Siemens Healthineers have entered into a multi-year agreement to bring cutting-edge...
ScImage Awarded U.S. Government DIN-PACS IV Contract
News | PACS | August 16, 2017
ScImage Inc. was recently awarded a new DIN-PACS IV (Digital Imaging Network/Picture Archiving and Communications...
Neighbors Emergency Center Selects Novarad PACS/RIS
News | PACS | August 15, 2017
August 15, 2017 — Novarad Corp.
Sponsored Content | Whitepapers | Enterprise Imaging | August 11, 2017
All around the world, regulatory requirements and market forces are driving a growing demand for higher-quality, more-...
RSNA Announces Pediatric Bone Age Machine Learning Challenge
News | Artificial Intelligence | August 10, 2017
August 10, 2017 — The Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) is organizing a challenge intended to show the app
Xavier University Announces Healthcare Artificial Intelligence Summit
News | Artificial Intelligence | August 07, 2017
Xavier University has launched the Xavier Center for Artificial Intelligence (AI), a pioneering effort to accelerate...
Fujifilm Launches Synapse PACS Version 5
Technology | PACS | August 03, 2017
August 3, 2017 – Fujifilm Medical Systems U.S.A. Inc.
The team from Smart City Networks, the first corporate donor for the HIMSS Steve Lieber Innovator Scholarship

The team from Smart City Networks, the first corporate donor for the HIMSS Steve Lieber Innovator Scholarship, came together during HIMSS17 for the check presentation. From left to right: Tim Overall, general manager; Marty Rubin, chief executive officer; Steve Lieber, HIMSS president/CEO; Frank Loyke, senior event coordinator; and Jennifer Way, assistant general manager

News | Information Technology | August 01, 2017
The Steve Lieber Innovator Scholarship, sponsored by the HIMSS Foundation, recognizes the leadership and passion for...
Overlay Init