Feature | September 25, 2013

Patient-Reported Outcomes Provide Valuable Insight Regarding Quality of Life in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Analysis of RTOG 0617 trial evaluates the impact of high-dose radiation therapy

September 25, 2013 – An analysis of quality of life (QOL) data of stage III lung cancer patients who received higher doses of radiation therapy (with chemotherapy) shows a significantly lower quality of life at three months after treatment compared to patients who received a standard dose of radiation (with chemotherapy), according to research presented at the American Society for Radiation Oncology’s (ASTRO’s) 55th Annual Meeting. The study also suggests that lung cancer patients who received intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reported less decline in their QOL compared to those receiving three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3-D CRT).

Patient data was compiled from the RTOG 0617 study, a phase III, randomized clinical trial of patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) conducted from 2007 to 2011. The randomized study compared a high-dose (HD) of 74 Gy to a standard dose (SD) of 60 Gy. All enrolled patients received concurrent chemotherapy of carboplatin/paclitaxel, and they were also randomly treated with or without cetuximab (C225). The radiation was administered with two types of radiation therapy (RT): 3-D CRT, in which beams of radiation are shaped to match the tumor, or IMRT, a more sophisticated technique that uses a computer-controlled algorithm to modify the intensity of each beam to further spare normal tissue. While the study was not randomized for the radiation treatment technique (3-D CRT or IMRT), the pretreatment characteristics were not significantly different for these techniques except that higher stage tumors were treated with IMRT. Prior results of a planned analysis of the trial determined that the higher dose of radiation therapy was associated with lower overall survival (OS), and, at that point, the high-dose radiation therapy arms of the study were closed.

Because the RTOG study indicated that OS rates were lower with higher doses of radiation, despite few differences in provider-reported toxicity between the study’s arms, researchers evaluated if patient-reported outcomes had any bearing on the results of the RTOG 0617 trial. Patient QOL scores were compared between the treatment arms, as well as between the RT techniques. QOL information was collected using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Trial Outcome Index (FACT-TOI), which is a compilation of physical well-being (PWB), functional well-being (FWB), and lung cancer subscale (LCS) results. Results were studied at baseline, at the end of chemoradiation, and at three months and 12 months post-treatment. Two-sample t-tests?the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test and the Chi-Square test?compared QOL between arms and between technologies (3-D CRT vs. IMRT) via two-sided p values and effect sizes (ES).

Baseline FACT-TOI were completed from each arm on 88 percent of patients, with no difference in patient demographics, baseline QOL scores or C225 use. Seventy-one percent of patients completed QOL data at three months, of whom approximately 60 percent of patients (225) completed it at 12 months.

The primary QOL hypothesis was that there would be a significant difference between arms at 3 months using the LCS, which focuses on key symptoms of lung cancer. A clinically meaningful decline (CMD) in LCS for patients receiving 74 Gy was significantly higher at three months post-treatment (46 percent) than for patients receiving 60 Gy (31 percent, p=0.024, ES 0.4); yet these differences resolved by 12 months, with the 74 Gy dose producing a CMD of 36 percent, and the 60 Gy dose producing a CMD of 39 percent (p=0.7, ES<0.1).

Additionally, the results suggested that IMRT, which was administered to 45 percent of patients in each arm, was associated with a much lower decline in QOL compared to those who received 3-D CRT, even a year after treatment. Indeed, at 12 months post-treatment, 23 percent of the IMRT patients in either arm had a CMD in LCS, as opposed to 47 percent of 3-D CRT patients (p=0.005, ES 0.3).

“This study further emphasizes the critical importance of patient-reported outcomes,” said Benjamin Movsas, M.D., FASTRO, the lead author of the study and chairman of the department of radiation oncology at the Henry Ford Health System in Detroit. “The fact that the QOL scores were initially lower in the high-dose radiation arm was illuminating because few differences in toxicity between the arms were noted by the health care providers. Thus, the patient-reported outcomes help tell ‘the rest of the story.’ Another intriguing discovery with our analysis was that QOL was significantly improved with the use of more sophisticated technology, i.e. IMRT (relative to 3-D CRT), suggesting that advanced radiation treatment techniques may provide meaningful QOL benefits for patients with non-small cell lung cancer.”

The abstract, “Quality of Life (QOL) Analysis of the Randomized Radiation (RT) Dose Escalation NSCLC Trial (RTOG 0617): The Rest of the Story,” was presented in detail Sep. 23 in the Plenary session at ASTRO’s Annual Meeting.

For more information: www.astro.org

Related Content

ASTRO Issues Clinical Guideline for Whole Breast Radiation Therapy
News | Radiation Therapy | March 12, 2018
The American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) today issued a new clinical guideline for the use of whole breast...
In scans of a 62-yr-old man with Gleason 4+3 PCa treated with radical prostatectomy, with rising PSA level (1.32) and PSA doubling time of 3.7 months, 64CuCl2-PET/CT images revealed 2 positive small left iliac lymph nodes (A,C), whereas 18F-Choline PET/CT (B,D) was negative (arrows).

In scans of a 62-yr-old man with Gleason 4+3 PCa treated with radical prostatectomy, with rising PSA level (1.32) and PSA doubling time of 3.7 months, 64CuCl2-PET/CT images revealed 2 positive small left iliac lymph nodes (A,C), whereas 18F-Choline PET/CT (B,D) was negative (arrows). Image courtesy of A Piccardo et al., Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy.

News | Prostate Cancer | March 07, 2018
An Italian study featured in the March i
Older women residing in the U.S territories are less likely to receive recommended or timely care for breast cancer compared with similar women residing in the continental United States
News | Women's Health | March 06, 2018
Older women residing in the U.S territories are less likely to receive recommended or timely care for breast cancer...
dense breast tissue can lead to a missed cancer diagnosis
News | Clinical Study | March 05, 2018
The Athena Breast Health Network has chosen Massachusetts-based Mammosphere to provide network management of medical...
Imaging Plays Key Role in Evaluating Injuries at Olympics
News | Orthopedic Imaging | February 28, 2018
The Olympic Games give elite athletes a chance at athletic triumph, but also carry a risk of injury. When injuries...
MD Anderson and RaySearch Partner to Advance Adaptive Radiation Therapy
News | Treatment Planning | February 26, 2018
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and RaySearch Laboratories announced a new strategic alliance with...
ASE Participating in Global Study to Establish New Standardization in Cardiovascular Ultrasound
News | Cardiovascular Ultrasound | February 26, 2018
February 26, 2018 – The American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) and its International Alliance Partners are joinin
Mirada Medical Releases DLCExpert for Radiotherapy Treatment Planning
Technology | Treatment Planning | February 22, 2018
February 22, 2018 — U.K.-based medical imaging software provider Mirada Medical has released DLCExpert, the first com
Mitchell Cancer Institute Selects RayStation for TomoTherapy Planning
News | Treatment Planning | February 16, 2018
The University of South Alabama Mitchell Cancer Institute (MCI) in Mobile, Ala., has selected RayStation as its...
Overlay Init